Andrew Tridgell e9ea36e4d2 tridge the destroyer returns! ... prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ... I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static (finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local file). in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this baggage. So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep the swearing to a minimum :) One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that? Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static? (This used to be commit 2204475c87)		1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
..
.cvsignore	added ignore rules for the dummy files	1998-08-09 11:25:49 +00:00
dummy.in	some merge cleanups	1998-07-29 03:15:02 +00:00
parse_lsa.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_misc.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_net.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_prs.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_reg.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_rpc.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_samr.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_srv.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00
parse_wks.c	tridge the destroyer returns!	1998-09-05 05:07:05 +00:00