mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-28 07:21:54 +03:00
4cfc296885
This adds a new test to check that if objects are modified during a replication, then those objects don't wind up missing from the replication data. Note that when this scenario occurs, samba returns the objects in a different order to Windows. This test doesn't care what order the replicated objects get returned in, so long as they all have been received by the end of the test. As part of this, I've refactored _check_replication() in drs_base.py so it can be reused in new tests. In these cases, the objects are split up over multiple different chunks. So asserting that the objects are returned in a specific order makes it difficult to run the same test on both Samba and Windows. Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
cracknames.py | ||
delete_object.py | ||
drs_base.py | ||
fsmo.py | ||
getnc_exop.py | ||
getncchanges.py | ||
linked_attributes_drs.py | ||
repl_move.py | ||
repl_rodc.py | ||
repl_schema.py | ||
replica_sync.py | ||
ridalloc_exop.py | ||
samba_tool_drs.py |