Andrew Tridgell 1b8d368a67 r10408: now that we are using tdb transactions we don't need any additional ...

locking code in the ldb_tdb backend, except for a single read lock
during searches to ensure searches don't cross transaction boundaries

The tdb transactions code would map these extra locks to noops anyway
(as locking makes no sense inside a transaction), but the work in
setting up the locking keys still costs something, and it makes the
code needlessly complex

2007-10-10 13:38:42 -05:00

..

ldb_cache.c

r9391: Convert all the code to use struct ldb_dn to ohandle ldap like distinguished names

2007-10-10 13:33:32 -05:00

ldb_index.c

r9391: Convert all the code to use struct ldb_dn to ohandle ldap like distinguished names

2007-10-10 13:33:32 -05:00

ldb_pack.c

r9391: Convert all the code to use struct ldb_dn to ohandle ldap like distinguished names

2007-10-10 13:33:32 -05:00

ldb_search.c

r10408: now that we are using tdb transactions we don't need any additional

2007-10-10 13:38:42 -05:00

ldb_tdb_wrap.c

r10253: a fairly large tdb cleanup and re-organise. Nearly all of this change

2007-10-10 13:38:12 -05:00

ldb_tdb.c

r10408: now that we are using tdb transactions we don't need any additional

2007-10-10 13:38:42 -05:00

ldb_tdb.h

r10408: now that we are using tdb transactions we don't need any additional

2007-10-10 13:38:42 -05:00