mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-23 17:34:34 +03:00
05d78aa205
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
1591 lines
63 KiB
XML
1591 lines
63 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
|
|
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//Samba-Team//DTD DocBook V4.2-Based Variant V1.0//EN" "http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc">
|
|
<chapter id="net2000users">
|
|
<title>A Distributed 2000-User Network</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
There is something indeed mystical about things that are
|
|
big. Large networks exhibit a certain magnetism and exude a sense of
|
|
importance that obscures reality. You and I know that it is no more
|
|
difficult to secure a large network than it is a small one. We all
|
|
know that over and above a particular number of network clients, the
|
|
rules no longer change; the only real dynamic is the size of the domain
|
|
(much like a kingdom) over which the network ruler (oops, administrator)
|
|
has control. The real dynamic then transforms from the technical to the
|
|
political. Then again, that point is often reached well before the
|
|
kingdom (or queendom) grows large.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
If you have systematically worked your way to this chapter, hopefully you
|
|
have found some gems and techniques that are applicable in your
|
|
world. The network designs you have worked with in this book have their
|
|
strong points as well as weak ones. That is to be expected given that
|
|
they are based on real business environments, the specifics of which are
|
|
molded to serve the purposes of this book.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
This chapter is intent on wrapping up issues that are central to
|
|
implementation and design of progressively larger networks. Are you ready
|
|
for this chapter? Good, it is time to move on.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
In previous chapters, you made the assumption that your network
|
|
administration staff need detailed instruction right down to the
|
|
nuts and bolts of implementing the solution. That is still the case,
|
|
but they have graduated now. You decide to document only those issues,
|
|
methods, and techniques that are new or complex. Routine tasks such as
|
|
implementing a DNS or a DHCP server are under control. Even the basics of
|
|
Samba are largely under control. So in this section you focus on the
|
|
specifics of implementing LDAP changes, Samba changes, and approach and
|
|
design of the solution and its deployment.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Introduction</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Abmas is a miracle company. Most businesses would have collapsed under
|
|
the weight of rapid expansion that this company has experienced. Samba
|
|
is flexible, so there is no need to reinstall the whole operating
|
|
system just because you need to implement a new network design. In fact,
|
|
you can keep an old server running right up to the moment of cutover
|
|
and then do a near-live conversion. There is no need to reinstall a
|
|
Samba server just to change the way your network should function.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Network growth is common to all organizations. In this exercise,
|
|
your preoccupation is with the mechanics of implementing Samba and
|
|
LDAP so that network users on each network segment can work
|
|
without impediment.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Assignment Tasks</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Starting with the configuration files for the server called
|
|
<constant>MASSIVE</constant> in <link linkend="happy"/>, you now deal with the
|
|
issues that are particular to large distributed networks. Your task
|
|
is simple &smbmdash; identify the challenges, consider the
|
|
alternatives, and then design and implement a solution.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>VPN</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Remember, you have users based in London (UK), Los Angeles,
|
|
Washington. DC, and, three buildings in New York. A significant portion
|
|
of your workforce have notebook computers and roam all over the
|
|
world. Some dial into the office, others use VPN connections over the
|
|
Internet, and others just move between buildings.i
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
What do you say to an employee who normally uses a desktop
|
|
system but must spend six weeks on the road with a notebook computer?
|
|
She is concerned about email access and how to keep coworkers current
|
|
with changing documents.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
To top it all off, you have one network support person and one
|
|
help desk person based in London, a single person dedicated to all
|
|
network operations in Los Angeles, five staff for user administration
|
|
and help desk in New York, plus one <emphasis>floater</emphasis> for
|
|
Washington.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
You have outsourced all desktop deployment and management to
|
|
DirectPointe. Your concern is server maintenance and third-level
|
|
support. Build a plan and show what must be done.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Dissection and Discussion</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>passdb backend</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
In <link linkend="happy"/>, you implemented an LDAP server that provided the
|
|
<parameter>passdb backend</parameter> for the Samba servers. You
|
|
explored ways to accelerate Windows desktop profile handling and you
|
|
took control of network performance.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>ldapsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>tdbsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replicated</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The implementation of an LDAP-based passdb backend (known as
|
|
<emphasis>ldapsam</emphasis> in Samba parlance), or some form of database
|
|
that can be distributed, is essential to permit the deployment of Samba
|
|
Primary and Backup Domain Controllers (PDC/BDCs). You see, the problem
|
|
is that the <emphasis>tdbsam</emphasis>-style passdb backend does not
|
|
lend itself to being replicated. The older plain-text-based
|
|
<emphasis>smbpasswd</emphasis>-style passdb backend can be replicated
|
|
using a tool such as <command>rsync</command>, but
|
|
<emphasis>smbpasswd</emphasis> suffers the drawback that it does not
|
|
support the range of account facilities demanded by modern network
|
|
managers.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>XML</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SQL</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The new <emphasis>tdbsam</emphasis> facility supports functionality
|
|
that is similar to an <emphasis>ldapsam</emphasis>, but the lack of
|
|
distributed infrastructure sorely limits the scope for its
|
|
deployment. This raises the following questions: Why can't I just use
|
|
an XML-based backend, or for that matter, why not use an SQL-based
|
|
backend? Is support for these tools broken? Answers to these
|
|
questions require a bit of background.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>transaction processing</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<emphasis>What is a directory?</emphasis> A directory is a
|
|
collection of information regarding objects that can be accessed to
|
|
rapidly find information that is relevant in a particular and
|
|
consistent manner. A directory differs from a database in that it is
|
|
generally more often searched (read) than updated. As a consequence, the
|
|
information is organized to facilitate read access rather than to
|
|
support transaction processing.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Lightweight Directory Access Protocol</primary><see>LDAP</see></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>master</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>slave</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) differs
|
|
considerably from a traditional database. It has a simple search
|
|
facility that uniquely makes a highly preferred mechanism for managing
|
|
user identities. LDAP provides a scalable mechanism for distributing
|
|
the data repository and for keeping all copies (slaves) in sync with
|
|
the master repository.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>identity management</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Active Directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba is a flexible and powerful file and print sharing
|
|
technology. It can use many external authentication sources and can be
|
|
part of a total authentication and identity management
|
|
infrastructure. The two most important external sources for large sites
|
|
are Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP. Sites that specifically wish to
|
|
avoid the proprietary implications of Microsoft Active Directory
|
|
naturally gravitate toward OpenLDAP.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>routed</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
In <link linkend="happy"/>, you had to deal with a locally routed
|
|
network. All deployment concerns focused around making users happy,
|
|
and that simply means taking control over all network practices and
|
|
usage so that no one user is disadvantaged by any other. The real
|
|
lesson is one of understanding that no matter how much network
|
|
bandwidth you provide, bandwidth remains a precious resource.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>In this chapter, you must now consider how the overall network must
|
|
function. In particular, you must be concerned with users who move
|
|
between offices. You must take into account the way users need to
|
|
access information globally. And you must make the network robust
|
|
enough so that it can sustain partial breakdown without causing loss of
|
|
productivity.</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Technical Issues</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
There are at least three areas that need to be addressed as you
|
|
approach the challenge of designing a network solution for the newly
|
|
expanded business:
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para><indexterm><primary>mobility</primary></indexterm>
|
|
User needs such as mobility and data access</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>The nature of Windows networking protocols</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>Identity management infrastructure needs</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<para>Let's look at each in turn.</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>User Needs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The new company has three divisions. Staff for each division are spread across
|
|
the company. Some staff are office-bound and some are mobile users. Mobile
|
|
users travel globally. Some spend considerable periods working in other offices.
|
|
Everyone wants to be able to work without constraint of productivity.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The challenge is not insignificant. In some parts of the world, even dial-up
|
|
connectivity is poor, while in other regions political encumbrances severely
|
|
curtail user needs. Parts of the global Internet infrastructure remain shielded
|
|
off for reasons outside the scope of this discussion.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>synchronize</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Decisions must be made regarding where data is to be stored, how it will be
|
|
replicated (if at all), and what the network bandwidth implications are. For
|
|
example, one decision that can be made is to give each office its own master
|
|
file storage area that can be synchronized to a central repository in New
|
|
York. This would permit global data to be backed up from a single location.
|
|
The synchronization tool could be <command>rsync,</command> run via a cron
|
|
job. Mobile users may use off-line file storage under Windows XP Professional.
|
|
This way, they can synchronize all files that have changed since each logon
|
|
to the network.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>bandwidth</primary><secondary>requirements</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>roaming profile</primary></indexterm>
|
|
No matter which way you look at this, the bandwidth requirements
|
|
for acceptable performance are substantial even if only 10 percent of
|
|
staff are global data users. A company with 3,500 employees,
|
|
280 of whom are mobile users who use a similarly distributed
|
|
network, found they needed at least 2 Mb/sec connectivity
|
|
between the UK and US offices. Even over 2 Mb/sec bandwidth, this
|
|
company abandoned any attempt to run roaming profile usage for
|
|
mobile users. At that time, the average roaming profile took 480
|
|
KB, while today the minimum Windows XP Professional roaming
|
|
profile involves a transfer of over 750 KB from the profile
|
|
server to and from the client.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Obviously then, user needs and wide-area practicalities dictate the economic and
|
|
technical aspects of your network design as well as for standard operating procedures.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>The Nature of Windows Networking Protocols</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>profile</primary><secondary>mandatory</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
Network logons that include roaming profile handling requires from 140 KB to 2 MB.
|
|
The inclusion of support for a minimal set of common desktop applications can push
|
|
the size of a complete profile to over 15 MB. This has substantial implications
|
|
for location of user profiles. Additionally, it is a significant factor in
|
|
determining the nature and style of mandatory profiles that may be enforced as
|
|
part of a total service-level assurance program that might be implemented.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>logon traffic</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>redirected folders</primary></indexterm>
|
|
One way to reduce the network bandwidth impact of user logon
|
|
traffic is through folder redirection. In <link linkend="happy"/>, you
|
|
implemented this in the new Windows XP Professional standard
|
|
desktop configuration. When desktop folders such as <guimenu>My
|
|
Documents</guimenu> are redirected to a network drive, they should
|
|
also be excluded from synchronization to and from the server on
|
|
logon or logout. Redirected folders are analogous to network drive
|
|
connections.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para><indexterm><primary>application servers</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Of course, network applications should only be run off
|
|
local application servers. As a general rule, even with 2 Mb/sec
|
|
network bandwidth, it would not make sense at all for someone who
|
|
is working out of the London office to run applications off a
|
|
server that is located in New York.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>affordability</primary></indexterm>
|
|
When network bandwidth becomes a precious commodity (that is most
|
|
of the time), there is a significant demand to understand network
|
|
processes and to mold the limits of acceptability around the
|
|
constraints of affordability.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
When a Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional client user logs onto
|
|
the network, several important things must happen.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The client obtains an IP address via DHCP. (DHCP is
|
|
necessary so that users can roam between offices.)
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DNS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The client must register itself with the WINS and/or DNS server.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Domain Controller</primary><secondary>closest</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
The client must locate the closest domain controller.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
The client must log onto a domain controller and obtain as part of
|
|
that process the location of the user's profile, load it, connect to
|
|
redirected folders, and establish all network drive and printer connections.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
The domain controller must be able to resolve the user's
|
|
credentials before the logon process is fully implemented.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Given that this book is about Samba and that it implements the Windows
|
|
NT4-style domain semantics, it makes little sense to compare Samba with
|
|
Microsoft Active Directory insofar as the logon protocols and principles
|
|
of operation are concerned. The following information pertains exclusively
|
|
to the interaction between a Windows XP Professional workstation and a
|
|
Samba-3.0.20 server. In the discussion that follows, use is made of DHCP and WINS.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
As soon as the Windows workstation starts up, it obtains an
|
|
IP address. This is immediately followed by registration of its
|
|
name both by broadcast and Unicast registration that is directed
|
|
at the WINS server.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Unicast</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>broadcast</primary><secondary>directed</secondary>
|
|
</indexterm><indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Given that the client is already a domain member, it then sends
|
|
a directed (Unicast) request to the WINS server seeking the list of
|
|
IP addresses for domain controllers (NetBIOS name type 0x1C). The
|
|
WINS server replies with the information requested.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>broadcast</primary><secondary>mailslot</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Unicast</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The client sends two netlogon mailslot broadcast requests
|
|
to the local network and to each of the IP addresses returned by
|
|
the WINS server. Whichever answers this request first appears to
|
|
be the machine that the Windows XP client attempts to use to
|
|
process the network logon. The mailslot messages use UDP broadcast
|
|
to the local network and UDP Unicast directed at each machine that
|
|
was listed in the WINS server response to a request for the list of
|
|
domain controllers.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>protocol</primary><secondary>negotiation</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>logon server</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>fail</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The logon process begins with negotiation of the SMB/CIFS
|
|
protocols that are to be used; this is followed by an exchange of
|
|
information that ultimately includes the client sending the
|
|
credentials with which the user is attempting to logon. The logon
|
|
server must now approve the further establishment of the
|
|
connection, but that is a good point to halt for now. The priority
|
|
here must center around identification of network infrastructure
|
|
needs. A secondary fact we need to know is, what happens when
|
|
local domain controllers fail or break?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Domain Controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>netlogon</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Under most circumstances, the nearest domain controller
|
|
responds to the netlogon mailslot broadcast. The exception to this
|
|
norm occurs when the nearest domain controller is too busy or is out
|
|
of service. Herein lies an important fact. This means it is
|
|
important that every network segment should have at least two
|
|
domain controllers. Since there can be only one PDC, all additional
|
|
domain controllers are by definition BDCs.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>authentication</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Identity Management</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The provision of sufficient servers that are BDCs is an
|
|
important design factor. The second important design factor
|
|
involves how each of the BDCs obtains user authentication
|
|
data. That is the subject of the next section, which involves key
|
|
decisions regarding Identity Management facilities.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>Identity Management Needs</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>privacy</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>user credentials</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>validated</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>privileges</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Network managers recognize that in large organizations users
|
|
generally need to be given resource access based on needs, while
|
|
being excluded from other resources for reasons of privacy. It is
|
|
therefore essential that all users identify themselves at the
|
|
point of network access. The network logon is the principal means
|
|
by which user credentials are validated and filtered and appropriate
|
|
rights and privileges are allocated.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Identity Management</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Yellow Pages</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Unfortunately, network resources tend to have their own Identity
|
|
Management facilities, the quality and manageability of which varies
|
|
from quite poor to exceptionally good. Corporations that use a mixture
|
|
of systems soon discover that until recently, few systems were
|
|
designed to interoperate. For example, UNIX systems each have an
|
|
independent user database. Sun Microsystems developed a facility that
|
|
was originally called <constant>Yellow Pages</constant>, and was renamed
|
|
when a telephone company objected to the use of its trademark.
|
|
What was once called <constant>Yellow Pages</constant> is today known
|
|
as <constant>Network Information System</constant> (NIS).
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS+</primary></indexterm>
|
|
NIS gained a strong following throughout the UNIX/VMS space in a short
|
|
period of time and retained that appeal and use for over a decade.
|
|
Security concerns and inherent limitations have caused it to enter its
|
|
twilight. NIS did not gain widespread appeal outside of the UNIX world
|
|
and was not universally adopted. Sun updated this to a more secure
|
|
implementation called NIS+, but even it has fallen victim to changing
|
|
demands as the demand for directory services that can be coupled with
|
|
other information systems is catching on.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>government</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>education</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Nevertheless, both NIS and NIS+ continue to hold ground in
|
|
business areas where UNIX still has major sway. Examples of
|
|
organizations that remain firmly attached to the use of NIS and
|
|
NIS+ include large government departments, education institutions,
|
|
and large corporations that have a scientific or engineering
|
|
focus.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>scalable</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>distributed</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Today's networking world needs a scalable, distributed Identity
|
|
Management infrastructure, commonly called a directory. The most
|
|
popular technologies today are Microsoft Active Directory service
|
|
and a number of LDAP implementations.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>multiple directories</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The problem of managing multiple directories has become a focal
|
|
point over the past decade, creating a large market for
|
|
metadirectory products and services that allow organizations that
|
|
have multiple directories and multiple management and control
|
|
centers to provision information from one directory into
|
|
another. The attendant benefit to end users is the promise of
|
|
having to remember and deal with fewer login identities and
|
|
passwords.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>bandwidth</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
The challenge of every large network is to find the optimum
|
|
balance of internal systems and facilities for Identity
|
|
Management resources. How well the solution is chosen and
|
|
implemented has potentially significant impact on network bandwidth
|
|
and systems response needs.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP server</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>master</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>slave</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
In <link linkend="happy"/>, you implemented a single LDAP server for the
|
|
entire network. This may work for smaller networks, but almost
|
|
certainly fails to meet the needs of large and complex networks. The
|
|
following section documents how you may implement a single
|
|
master LDAP server with multiple slave servers.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
What is the best method for implementing master/slave LDAP
|
|
servers within the context of a distributed 2,000-user network is a
|
|
question that remains to be answered.</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>distributed domain</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|
One possibility that has great appeal is to create a single,
|
|
large distributed domain. The practical implications of this
|
|
design (see <link linkend="chap7net"/>) demands the placement of
|
|
sufficient BDCs in each location. Additionally, network
|
|
administrators must make sure that profiles are not transferred
|
|
over the wide-area links, except as a totally unavoidable
|
|
measure. Network design must balance the risk of loss of user
|
|
productivity against the cost of network management and
|
|
maintenance.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain name space</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The network design in <link linkend="chap7net2"/> takes the approach
|
|
that management of networks that are too remote to be managed
|
|
effectively from New York ought to be given a certain degree of
|
|
autonomy. With this rationale, the Los Angeles and London networks,
|
|
though fully integrated with those on the East Coast, each have their
|
|
own domain name space and can be independently managed and controlled.
|
|
One of the key drawbacks of this design is that it flies in the face of
|
|
the ability for network users to roam globally without some compromise
|
|
in how they may access global resources.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>interdomain trusts</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Desk-bound users need not be negatively affected by this design, since
|
|
the use of interdomain trusts can be used to satisfy the need for global
|
|
data sharing.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>backend</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
When Samba is configured to use an LDAP backend, it stores the domain
|
|
account information in a directory entry. This account entry contains the
|
|
domain SID. An unintended but exploitable side effect is that this makes it
|
|
possible to operate with more than one PDC on a distributed network.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>wins.dat</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
How might this peculiar feature be exploited? The answer is simple. It is
|
|
imperative that each network segment have its own WINS server. Major
|
|
servers on remote network segments can be given a static WINS entry in
|
|
the <filename>wins.dat</filename> file on each WINS server. This allows
|
|
all essential data to be visible from all locations. Each location would,
|
|
however, function as if it is an independent domain, while all sharing the
|
|
same domain SID. Since all domain account information can be stored in a
|
|
single LDAP backend, users have unfettered ability to roam.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NetBIOS name</primary><secondary>aliases</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>fail-over</primary></indexterm>
|
|
This concept has not been exhaustively validated, though we can see no reason
|
|
why this should not work. The important facets are the following: The name of
|
|
the domain must be identical in all locations. Each network segment must have
|
|
its own WINS server. The name of the PDC must be the same in all locations; this
|
|
necessitates the use of NetBIOS name aliases for each PDC so that they can be
|
|
accessed globally using the alias and not the PDC's primary name. A single master
|
|
LDAP server can be based in New York, with multiple LDAP slave servers located
|
|
on every network segment. Finally, the BDCs should each use failover LDAP servers
|
|
that are in fact slave LDAP servers on the local segments.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>updates</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain tree</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>database</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>directory</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
With a single master LDAP server, all network updates are effected on a single
|
|
server. In the event that this should become excessively fragile or network
|
|
bandwidth limiting, one could implement a delegated LDAP domain. This is also
|
|
known as a partitioned (or multiple partition) LDAP database and as a distributed
|
|
LDAP directory.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
As the LDAP directory grows, it becomes increasingly important
|
|
that its structure is implemented in a manner that mirrors
|
|
organizational needs, so as to limit network update and
|
|
referential traffic. It should be noted that all directory
|
|
administrators must of necessity follow the same standard
|
|
procedures for managing the directory, because retroactive correction of
|
|
inconsistent directory information can be exceedingly difficult.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Political Issues</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
As organizations grow, the number of points of control increases
|
|
also. In a large distributed organization, it is important that the
|
|
Identity Management system be capable of being updated from
|
|
many locations, and it is equally important that changes made should
|
|
become usable in a reasonable period, typically
|
|
minutes rather than days (the old limitation of highly manual
|
|
systems).
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Implementation</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>winbind</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>UID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>GID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba has the ability to use multiple password (authentication and
|
|
identity resolution) backends. The diagram in <link linkend="chap7idres"/>
|
|
demonstrates how Samba uses winbind, LDAP, and NIS, the traditional system
|
|
password database. The diagram only documents the mechanisms for
|
|
authentication and identity resolution (obtaining a UNIX UID/GID)
|
|
using the specific systems shown.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<figure id="chap7idres">
|
|
<title>Samba and Authentication Backend Search Pathways</title>
|
|
<imagefile scale="55">chap7-idresol</imagefile>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>xmlsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SMB passwords</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>tdbsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>mysqlsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>distributed</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba is capable of using the <constant>smbpasswd</constant> and
|
|
<constant>tdbsam</constant>. The SMB
|
|
passwords can, of course, also be stored in an LDAP ldapsam
|
|
backend. LDAP is the preferred passdb backend for distributed network
|
|
operations.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>passdb backend</primary></indexterm>
|
|
You can specify a failover LDAP backend. The syntax for specifying a
|
|
single LDAP backend in &smb.conf; is:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
...
|
|
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz
|
|
...
|
|
</screen>
|
|
This configuration tells Samba to use a single LDAP server, as shown in <link linkend="ch7singleLDAP"/>.
|
|
<figure id="ch7singleLDAP">
|
|
<title>Samba Configuration to Use a Single LDAP Server</title>
|
|
<imagefile scale="65">ch7-singleLDAP</imagefile>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>fail-over</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>fail-over</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The addition of a failover LDAP server can simply be done by adding a
|
|
second entry for the failover server to the single <parameter>ldapsam</parameter>
|
|
entry, as shown here (note the particular use of the double quotes):
|
|
<screen>
|
|
...
|
|
passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://master.abmas.biz \
|
|
ldap://slave.abmas.biz"
|
|
...
|
|
</screen>
|
|
This configuration tells Samba to use a master LDAP server, with failover to a slave server if necessary,
|
|
as shown in <link linkend="ch7dualLDAP"/>.
|
|
<figure id="ch7dualLDAP">
|
|
<title>Samba Configuration to Use a Dual (Fail-over) LDAP Server</title>
|
|
<imagefile scale="65">ch7-fail-overLDAP</imagefile>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
It is assumed that the network you are working with follows in a
|
|
pattern similar to what was covered in <link linkend="happy"/>. The following steps
|
|
permit the operation of a master/slave OpenLDAP arrangement.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<procedure>
|
|
<title>Implementation Steps for an LDAP Slave Server</title>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SUSE Linux</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Red Hat Linux</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Log onto the master LDAP server as <constant>root</constant>.
|
|
You are about to change the configuration of the LDAP server, so it
|
|
makes sense to temporarily halt it. Stop OpenLDAP from running on
|
|
SUSE Linux by executing:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; rcldap stop
|
|
</screen>
|
|
On Red Hat Linux, you can do this by executing:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; service ldap stop
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Edit the <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename> file so it
|
|
matches the content of <link linkend="ch7-LDAP-master"/>.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
Create a file called <filename>admin-accts.ldif</filename> with the following contents:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
dn: cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|
objectClass: person
|
|
cn: updateuser
|
|
sn: updateuser
|
|
userPassword: not24get
|
|
|
|
dn: cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|
objectClass: person
|
|
cn: sambaadmin
|
|
sn: sambaadmin
|
|
userPassword: buttercup
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
Add an account called <quote>updateuser</quote> to the master LDAP server as shown here:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; slapadd -v -l admin-accts.ldif
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDIF</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>preload</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
Change directory to a suitable place to dump the contents of the
|
|
LDAP server. The dump file (and LDIF file) is used to preload
|
|
the slave LDAP server database. You can dump the database by executing:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; slapcat -v -l LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt
|
|
</screen>
|
|
Each record is written to the file.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Copy the file <filename>LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt</filename> to the intended
|
|
slave LDAP server. A good location could be in the directory
|
|
<filename>/etc/openldap/preload</filename>.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
Log onto the slave LDAP server as <constant>root</constant>. You can
|
|
now configure this server so the <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename>
|
|
file matches the content of <link linkend="ch7-LDAP-slave"/>.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
Change directory to the location in which you stored the
|
|
<filename>LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt</filename> file (<filename>/etc/openldap/preload</filename>).
|
|
While in this directory, execute:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; slapadd -v -l LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt
|
|
</screen>
|
|
If all goes well, the following output confirms that the data is being loaded
|
|
as intended:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
added: "dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000001)
|
|
added: "cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000002)
|
|
added: "cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000003)
|
|
added: "ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000004)
|
|
added: "ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000005)
|
|
added: "ou=Computers,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000006)
|
|
added: "uid=Administrator,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000007)
|
|
added: "uid=nobody,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000008)
|
|
added: "cn=Domain Admins,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000009)
|
|
added: "cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000a)
|
|
added: "cn=Domain Guests,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000b)
|
|
added: "uid=bobj,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000c)
|
|
added: "sambaDomainName=MEGANET2,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000d)
|
|
added: "uid=stans,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000e)
|
|
added: "uid=chrisr,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000f)
|
|
added: "uid=maryv,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000010)
|
|
added: "cn=Accounts,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000011)
|
|
added: "cn=Finances,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000012)
|
|
added: "cn=PIOps,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000013)
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
Now start the LDAP server and set it to run automatically on system reboot by executing:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; rcldap start
|
|
&rootprompt; chkconfig ldap on
|
|
</screen>
|
|
On Red Hat Linux, execute the following:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; service ldap start
|
|
&rootprompt; chkconfig ldap on
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>chkconfig</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>service</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>rcldap</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Go back to the master LDAP server. Execute the following to start LDAP as well
|
|
as <command>slurpd</command>, the synchronization daemon, as shown here:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; rcldap start
|
|
&rootprompt; chkconfig ldap on
|
|
&rootprompt; rcslurpd start
|
|
&rootprompt; chkconfig slurpd on
|
|
</screen>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>slurpd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
On Red Hat Linux, check the equivalent command to start <command>slurpd</command>.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>smbldap-useradd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
On the master LDAP server you may now add an account to validate that replication
|
|
is working. Assuming the configuration shown in <link linkend="happy"/>, execute:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-useradd -a fruitloop
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
On the slave LDAP server, change to the directory <filename>/var/lib/ldap</filename>.
|
|
There should now be a file called <filename>replogfile</filename>. If replication worked
|
|
as expected, the content of this file should be:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
time: 1072486403
|
|
dn: uid=fruitloop,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|
changetype: modify
|
|
replace: sambaProfilePath
|
|
sambaProfilePath: \\MASSIVE\profiles\fruitloop
|
|
-
|
|
replace: sambaHomePath
|
|
sambaHomePath: \\MASSIVE\homes
|
|
-
|
|
replace: entryCSN
|
|
entryCSN: 2003122700:43:38Z#0x0005#0#0000
|
|
-
|
|
replace: modifiersName
|
|
modifiersName: cn=Manager,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|
-
|
|
replace: modifyTimestamp
|
|
modifyTimestamp: 20031227004338Z
|
|
-
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
Given that this first slave LDAP server is now working correctly, you may now
|
|
implement additional slave LDAP servers as required.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
<step><para>
|
|
On each machine (PDC and BDCs) after the respective &smb.conf; files have been created as shown in
|
|
<link linkend="ch7-massmbconfA">Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A + B + C</link> and
|
|
on BDCs the <link linkend="ch7-slvsmbocnfA">Backup Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A
|
|
+ B + C</link> execute the following:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt; smbpasswd -w buttercup
|
|
</screen>
|
|
This will install in the <filename>secrets.tdb</filename> file the password that Samba will need to
|
|
manage (write to) the LDAP Master server to perform account updates.
|
|
</para></step>
|
|
|
|
</procedure>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-LDAP-master">
|
|
<title>LDAP Master Server Configuration File &smbmdash; <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename></title>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
|
|
|
|
pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid
|
|
argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args
|
|
|
|
database bdb
|
|
suffix "dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|
rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|
|
|
# rootpw = not24get
|
|
rootpw {SSHA}86kTavd9Dw3FAz6qzWTrCOKX/c0Qe+UV
|
|
|
|
replica host=lapdc.abmas.biz:389
|
|
suffix="dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|
binddn="cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|
bindmethod=simple credentials=not24get
|
|
|
|
access to attrs=sambaLMPassword,sambaNTPassword
|
|
by dn="cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz" write
|
|
by * none
|
|
|
|
replogfile /var/lib/ldap/replogfile
|
|
|
|
directory /var/lib/ldap
|
|
|
|
# Indices to maintain
|
|
index objectClass eq
|
|
index cn pres,sub,eq
|
|
index sn pres,sub,eq
|
|
index uid pres,sub,eq
|
|
index displayName pres,sub,eq
|
|
index uidNumber eq
|
|
index gidNumber eq
|
|
index memberUID eq
|
|
index sambaSID eq
|
|
index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq
|
|
index sambaDomainName eq
|
|
index default sub
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-LDAP-slave">
|
|
<title>LDAP Slave Configuration File &smbmdash; <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename></title>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
|
|
include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
|
|
|
|
pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid
|
|
argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args
|
|
|
|
database bdb
|
|
suffix "dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|
rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|
|
|
# rootpw = not24get
|
|
rootpw {SSHA}86kTavd9Dw3FAz6qzWTrCOKX/c0Qe+UV
|
|
|
|
access to *
|
|
by dn=cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz write
|
|
by * read
|
|
|
|
updatedn cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|
updateref ldap://massive.abmas.biz
|
|
|
|
directory /var/lib/ldap
|
|
|
|
# Indices to maintain
|
|
index objectClass eq
|
|
index cn pres,sub,eq
|
|
index sn pres,sub,eq
|
|
index uid pres,sub,eq
|
|
index displayName pres,sub,eq
|
|
index uidNumber eq
|
|
index gidNumber eq
|
|
index memberUID eq
|
|
index sambaSID eq
|
|
index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq
|
|
index sambaDomainName eq
|
|
index default sub
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-massmbconfA">
|
|
<title>Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfcomment>Global parameters</smbconfcomment>
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[global]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="unix charset">LOCALE</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="workgroup">MEGANET2</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam:ldap://massive.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="username map">/etc/samba/smbusers</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="log level">1</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="syslog">0</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="log file">/var/log/samba/%m</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="max log size">0</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="smb ports">139</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="name resolve order">wins bcast hosts</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="time server">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="printcap name">CUPS</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="add user script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="delete user script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-userdel '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="add group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p '%g'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="delete group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupdel '%g'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="add user to group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m '%g' '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="delete user from group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x '%g' '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="set primary group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g '%g' '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="add machine script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="shutdown script">/var/lib/samba/scripts/shutdown.sh</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="abort shutdown script">/sbin/shutdown -c</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="logon script">scripts\logon.bat</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="logon path">\\%L\profiles\%U</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="logon drive">X:</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain master">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="wins support">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap suffix">dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap machine suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap user suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap group suffix">ou=Groups</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix">ou=Idmap</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn">cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap backend">ldap://massive.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap uid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap gid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="printing">cups</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-massmbconfB">
|
|
<title>Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part B</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[IPC$]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/tmp</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[accounts]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Accounting Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/data/accounts</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[service]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Financial Services Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/data/service</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[pidata]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Property Insurance Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/data/pidata</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[homes]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Home Directories</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="valid users">%S</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[printers]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">SMB Print Spool</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/spool/samba</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="printable">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-massmbconfC">
|
|
<title>Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part C</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[apps]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Application Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/apps</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="admin users">bjones</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Network Logon Service</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/netlogon</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="admin users">root, Administrator</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="locking">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[profiles]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Share</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profiles</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[profdata]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Data Share</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profdata</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[print$]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Printer Drivers</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/drivers</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="write list">root</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="admin users">root, Administrator</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-slvsmbocnfA">
|
|
<title>Backup Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfcomment># Global parameters</smbconfcomment>
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[global]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="unix charset">LOCALE</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="workgroup">MEGANET2</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="netbios name">BLDG1</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam:ldap://lapdc.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="username map">/etc/samba/smbusers</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="log level">1</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="syslog">0</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="log file">/var/log/samba/%m</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="max log size">50</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="smb ports">139</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="name resolve order">wins bcast hosts</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="printcap name">CUPS</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="show add printer wizard">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="logon script">scripts\logon.bat</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="logon path">\\%L\profiles\%U</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="logon drive">X:</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="os level">63</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain master">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="wins server">192.168.2.1</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap suffix">dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap machine suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap user suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap group suffix">ou=Groups</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix">ou=Idmap</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn">cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="utmp">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap backend">ldap://massive.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap uid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap gid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="printing">cups</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[accounts]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Accounting Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/data/accounts</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[service]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Financial Services Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/data/service</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<example id="ch7-slvsmbocnfB">
|
|
<title>Backup Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part B</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[pidata]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Property Insurance Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/data/pidata</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[homes]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Home Directories</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="valid users">%S</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[printers]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">SMB Print Spool</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/spool/samba</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="printable">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[apps]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Application Files</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/apps</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="admin users">bjones</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Network Logon Service</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/netlogon</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="locking">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[profiles]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Share</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profiles</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[profdata]"/>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Data Share</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profdata</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Key Points Learned</title>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm><indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Where Samba is used as a domain controller, the use of LDAP is an
|
|
essential component to permit the use of BDCs.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Replication of the LDAP master server to create a network of BDCs
|
|
is an important mechanism for limiting WAN traffic.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
Network administration presents many complex challenges, most of which
|
|
can be satisfied by good design but that also require sound communication
|
|
and unification of management practices. This can be highly challenging in
|
|
a large, globally distributed network.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
Roaming profiles must be contained to the local network segment. Any
|
|
departure from this may clog wide-area arteries and slow legitimate network
|
|
traffic to a crawl.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<figure id="chap7net">
|
|
<title>Network Topology &smbmdash; 2000 User Complex Design A</title>
|
|
<imagefile scale="80">chap7-net-Ar</imagefile>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
<figure id="chap7net2">
|
|
<title>Network Topology &smbmdash; 2000 User Complex Design B</title>
|
|
<imagefile scale="80">chap7-net2-Br</imagefile>
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Questions and Answers</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
There is much rumor and misinformation regarding the use of MS Windows networking protocols.
|
|
These questions are just a few of those frequently asked.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<qandaset defaultlabel="chap07qa" type="number">
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>bandwidth</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
Is it true that DHCP uses lots of WAN bandwidth?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>Relay Agent</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>routers</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>servers</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
It is a smart practice to localize DHCP servers on each network segment. As a
|
|
rule, there should be two DHCP servers per network segment. This means that if
|
|
one server fails, there is always another to service user needs. DHCP requests use
|
|
only UDP broadcast protocols. It is possible to run a DHCP Relay Agent on network
|
|
routers. This makes it possible to run fewer DHCP servers.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>request</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>traffic</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
A DHCP network address request and confirmation usually results in about six UDP packets.
|
|
The packets are from 60 to 568 bytes in length. Let us consider a site that has 300 DHCP
|
|
clients and that uses a 24-hour IP address lease. This means that all clients renew
|
|
their IP address lease every 24 hours. If we assume an average packet length equal to the
|
|
maximum (just to be on the safe side), and we have a 128 Kb/sec wide-area connection,
|
|
how significant would the DHCP traffic be if all of it were to use DHCP Relay?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
I must stress that this is a bad design, but here is the calculation:
|
|
<screen>
|
|
Daily Network Capacity: 128,000 (Kbits/s) / 8 (bits/byte)
|
|
x 3600 (sec/hr) x 24 (hrs/day)= 2288 Mbytes/day.
|
|
|
|
DHCP traffic: 300 (clients) x 6 (packets)
|
|
x 512 (bytes/packet) = 0.9 Mbytes/day.
|
|
</screen>
|
|
From this can be seen that the traffic impact would be minimal.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DNS</primary><secondary>Dynamic</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Even when DHCP is configured to do DNS update (dynamic DNS) over a wide-area link,
|
|
the impact of the update is no more than the DHCP IP address renewal traffic and thus
|
|
still insignificant for most practical purposes.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>background communication</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>master/slave</secondary><tertiary>background communication</tertiary></indexterm>
|
|
How much background communication takes place between a master LDAP server and its slave LDAP servers?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>slurpd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The process that controls the replication of data from the master LDAP server to the slave LDAP
|
|
servers is called <command>slurpd</command>. The <command>slurpd</command> remains nascent (quiet)
|
|
until an update must be propagated. The propagation traffic per LDAP slave to update (add/modify/delete)
|
|
two user accounts requires less than 10KB traffic.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
LDAP has a database. Is LDAP not just a fancy database front end?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>database</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SQL</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>transactional</primary></indexterm>
|
|
LDAP does store its data in a database of sorts. In fact, the LDAP backend is an application-specific
|
|
data storage system. This type of database is indexed so that records can be rapidly located, but the
|
|
database is not generic and can be used only in particular pre-programmed ways. General external
|
|
applications do not gain access to the data. This type of database is used also by SQL servers. Both
|
|
an SQL server and an LDAP server provide ways to access the data. An SQL server has a transactional
|
|
orientation and typically allows external programs to perform ad hoc queries, even across data tables.
|
|
An LDAP front end is a purpose-built tool that has a search orientation that is designed around specific
|
|
simple queries. The term <constant>database</constant> is heavily overloaded and thus much misunderstood.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Can Active Directory obtain account information from an OpenLDAP server?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>meta-directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|
No, at least not directly. It is possible to provision Active Directory from and/or to an OpenLDAP
|
|
database through use of a metadirectory server. Microsoft MMS (now called MIIS) can interface
|
|
to OpenLDAP using standard LDAP queries and updates.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
What are the parts of a roaming profile? How large is each part?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para><indexterm>
|
|
<primary>roaming profile</primary>
|
|
</indexterm>
|
|
A roaming profile consists of
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
Desktop folders such as <constant>Desktop</constant>, <constant>My Documents</constant>,
|
|
<constant>My Pictures</constant>, <constant>My Music</constant>, <constant>Internet Files</constant>,
|
|
<constant>Cookies</constant>, <constant>Application Data</constant>,
|
|
<constant>Local Settings,</constant> and more. See <link linkend="happy"/>, <link linkend="XP-screen001"/>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>folder redirection</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Each of these can be anywhere from a few bytes to gigabytes in capacity. Fortunately, all
|
|
such folders can be redirected to network drive resources. See <link linkend="redirfold"/>
|
|
for more information regarding folder redirection.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
A static or rewritable portion that is typically only a few files (2-5 KB of information).
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NTUSER.DAT</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>HKEY_LOCAL_USER</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The registry load file that modifies the <constant>HKEY_LOCAL_USER</constant> hive. This is
|
|
the <filename>NTUSER.DAT</filename> file. It can be from 0.4 to 1.5 MB.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Microsoft Outlook</primary><secondary>PST files</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
Microsoft Outlook PST files may be stored in the <constant>Local Settings\Application Data</constant>
|
|
folder. It can be up to 2 GB in size per PST file.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Can the <constant>My Documents</constant> folder be stored on a network drive?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>UNC name</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Universal Naming Convention</primary><see>UNC name</see></indexterm>
|
|
Yes. More correctly, such folders can be redirected to network shares. No specific network drive
|
|
connection is required. Registry settings permit this to be redirected directly to a UNC (Universal
|
|
Naming Convention) resource, though it is possible to specify a network drive letter instead of a
|
|
UNC name. See <link linkend="redirfold"/>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>bandwidth</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
How much WAN bandwidth does WINS consume?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary><secondary>name cache</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>WINS server</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain replication</primary></indexterm>
|
|
MS Windows clients cache information obtained from WINS lookups in a local NetBIOS name cache.
|
|
This keeps WINS lookups to a minimum. On a network with 3500 MS Windows clients and a central WINS
|
|
server, the total bandwidth demand measured at the WINS server, averaged over an 8-hour working day,
|
|
was less than 30 KB/sec. Analysis of network traffic over a 6-week period showed that the total
|
|
of all background traffic consumed about 11 percent of available bandwidth over 64 Kb/sec links.
|
|
Background traffic consisted of domain replication, WINS queries, DNS lookups, and authentication
|
|
traffic. Each of 11 branch offices had a 64 Kb/sec wide-area link, with a 1.5 Mb/sec main connection
|
|
that aggregated the branch office connections plus an Internet connection.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
In conclusion, the total load afforded through WINS traffic is again marginal to total operational
|
|
usage &smbmdash; as it should be.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
How many BDCs should I have? What is the right number of Windows clients per server?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
It is recommended to have at least one BDC per network segment, including the segment served
|
|
by the PDC. Actual requirements vary depending on the working load on each of the BDCs and the
|
|
load demand pattern of client usage. I have seen sites that function without problem with 200
|
|
clients served by one BDC, and yet other sites that had one BDC per 20 clients. In one particular
|
|
company, there was a drafting office that had 30 CAD/CAM operators served by one server, a print
|
|
server; and an application server. While all three were BDCs, typically only the print server would
|
|
service network logon requests after the first 10 users had started to use the network. This was
|
|
a reflection of the service load placed on both the application server and the data server.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
As unsatisfactory as the answer might sound, it all depends on network and server load
|
|
characteristics.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS server</primary></indexterm><indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
I've heard that you can store NIS accounts in LDAP. Is LDAP not just a smarter way to
|
|
run an NIS server?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The correct answer to both questions is yes. But do understand that an LDAP server has
|
|
a configurable schema that can store far more information for many more purposes than
|
|
just NIS.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
<qandaentry>
|
|
<question>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Can I use NIS in place of LDAP?
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</question>
|
|
<answer>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS schema</primary></indexterm>
|
|
No. The NIS database does not have provision to store Microsoft encrypted passwords and does not deal
|
|
with the types of data necessary for interoperability with Microsoft Windows networking. The use
|
|
of LDAP with Samba requires the use of a number of schemas, one of which is the NIS schema, but also
|
|
a Samba-specific schema extension.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</answer>
|
|
</qandaentry>
|
|
|
|
</qandaset>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
</chapter>
|
|
|