Ronnie Sahlberg e666808f60 no need to have a separate assignment of the tcparray pointer followed ... by a talloc_steal() use the returned pointer in talloc_steal as the value to assign (This used to be ctdb commit 5c6375ad3bbecfa725ec3b1477f259e5a8191866)		2007-07-25 08:03:58 +10:00
..
ctdb_call.c	pass the header to ctdb_become_dmaster instead of just the reqid	2007-07-11 09:44:52 +10:00
ctdb_control.c	updated ctdb tickle management	2007-07-20 15:05:55 +10:00
ctdb_daemon.c	updated ctdb tickle management	2007-07-20 15:05:55 +10:00
ctdb_freeze.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_lockwait.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_ltdb_server.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_monitor.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_recover.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_recoverd.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_server.c	print the operation code in the debug message when we discard a packet	2007-07-11 08:41:29 +10:00
ctdb_takeover.c	no need to have a separate assignment of the tcparray pointer followed	2007-07-25 08:03:58 +10:00
ctdb_traverse.c	update lib/replace from samba4	2007-07-10 15:29:31 +10:00
ctdb_tunables.c	updated ctdb tickle management	2007-07-20 15:05:55 +10:00
ctdbd.c	fixed the sense of do_setsched	2007-07-13 09:14:31 +10:00
eventscript.c	make sure we still run events when waiting for ctdb_event_script()	2007-07-19 13:36:00 +10:00