mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-27 03:21:53 +03:00
c8c2c850d4
The mailing lists are on lists.samba.org, but there are many references that use the shorthand of samba.org Some references to samba@ have been changed to samba-technical@ where this make more sense. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz> Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Feb 10 07:08:28 CET 2015 on sn-devel-104
121 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
121 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
How to contribute a patch to Samba
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Simple, just make the code change, and email it as either a "diff -u"
|
|
change, or as a "git format-patch" change against the original source
|
|
code to samba-technical@lists.samba.org, or attach it to a bug report at
|
|
http://bugzilla.samba.org
|
|
|
|
For larger code changes, breaking the changes up into a set of simple
|
|
patches, each of which does a single thing, are much easier to review.
|
|
Patch sets like that will most likely have an easier time being merged
|
|
into the Samba code than large single patches that make lots of
|
|
changes in one large diff.
|
|
|
|
Ownership of the contributed code
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Samba is a project with distributed copyright ownership, which means
|
|
we prefer the copyright on parts of Samba to be held by individuals
|
|
rather than corporations if possible. There are historical legal
|
|
reasons for this, but one of the best ways to explain it is that it's
|
|
much easier to work with individuals who have ownership than corporate
|
|
legal departments if we ever need to make reasonable compromises with
|
|
people using and working with Samba.
|
|
|
|
We track the ownership of every part of Samba via git, our source code
|
|
control system, so we know the provenance of every piece of code that
|
|
is committed to Samba.
|
|
|
|
So if possible, if you're doing Samba changes on behalf of a company
|
|
who normally owns all the work you do please get them to assign
|
|
personal copyright ownership of your changes to you as an individual,
|
|
that makes things very easy for us to work with and avoids bringing
|
|
corporate legal departments into the picture.
|
|
|
|
If you can't do this we can still accept patches from you owned by
|
|
your employer under a standard employment contract with corporate
|
|
copyright ownership. It just requires a simple set-up process first.
|
|
|
|
We use a process very similar to the way things are done in the Linux
|
|
kernel community, so it should be very easy to get a sign off from
|
|
your corporate legal department. The only changes we've made are to
|
|
accommodate the licenses we use, which are GPLv3 and LGPLv3 (or later)
|
|
whereas the Linux kernel uses GPLv2.
|
|
|
|
The process is called signing.
|
|
|
|
How to sign your work
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
Once you have permission to contribute to Samba from
|
|
your employer, simply email a copy of the following text
|
|
from your corporate email address to contributing@samba.org
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Samba Developer's Certificate of Origin. Version 1.0
|
|
|
|
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
|
|
|
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
|
have the right to submit it under the appropriate
|
|
version of the GNU General Public License; or
|
|
|
|
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
|
|
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
|
|
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
|
|
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
|
|
by me, under the GNU General Public License, in the
|
|
appropriate version; or
|
|
|
|
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
|
person who certified (a) or (b) and I have not modified
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the
|
|
contribution are public and that a record of the
|
|
contribution (including all metadata and personal
|
|
information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
|
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed
|
|
consistent with the Samba Team's policies and the
|
|
requirements of the GNU GPL where they are relevant.
|
|
|
|
(e) I am granting this work to this project under the terms of both
|
|
the GNU General Public License and the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
|
|
3 of these Licenses, or (at the option of the project) any later
|
|
version.
|
|
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.html
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We will maintain a copy of that email as a record that you have the
|
|
rights to contribute code to Samba under the required licenses whilst
|
|
working for the company where the email came from.
|
|
|
|
Then when sending in a patch via the normal mechanisms described
|
|
above, add a line that states:
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
|
|
|
|
using your real name and the email address you sent the original email
|
|
you used to send the Samba Developer's Certificate of Origin to us
|
|
(sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
|
|
|
|
That's it ! Such code can then quite happily contain changes that have
|
|
copyright messages such as :
|
|
|
|
(C) Example Corporation.
|
|
|
|
and can be merged into the Samba codebase in the same way as patches
|
|
from any other individual. You don't need to send in a copy of the
|
|
Samba Developer's Certificate of Origin for each patch, or inside each
|
|
patch. Just the sign-off message is all that is required once we've
|
|
received the initial email.
|
|
|
|
Have fun and happy Samba hacking !
|
|
|
|
The Samba Team.
|
|
|