Ronnie Sahlberg b57bd0f896 Remove LACOUNT and LACCESSOR and migrate the records immediately. ... This concept didnt work out and it is really just as expensive as a full migration anyway, without the benefit of caching the data for subsequence accesses. Now, migrate the records immediately on first access. This will be combined with a "cheap vacuum-lite" for special empty records to prevent growth of databases. Later extensions to mimic read-only behaviour of records will include proper shared read-only locking of database records, making the laccessor/lacount read-only access to the data obsolete anyway. By removing this special case and handling of lacount laccessor makes the codapath where shared read-only locking will be be implemented simpler, and frees up space in the ctdb_ltdb header for use by vacuuming flags as well as read-only locking flags. (This used to be ctdb commit 155dd1f4885fe142c6f8bd09430f65daf8a17e51)		2011-02-18 10:08:32 +11:00
..
ctdb_client.c	Remove LACOUNT and LACCESSOR and migrate the records immediately.	2011-02-18 10:08:32 +11:00