mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2025-01-11 05:18:09 +03:00
7055827b8f
This makes it clearer that we always want to do heimdal changes via the lorikeet-heimdal repository. Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz> Autobuild-User(master): Joseph Sutton <jsutton@samba.org> Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jan 19 21:41:59 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
349 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
349 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext
|
||
|
||
|
||
Kerberos working group J.Brezak
|
||
Internet Draft Microsoft
|
||
Document: draft-brezak-spnego-http-04.txt
|
||
Category: Informational
|
||
October 2002
|
||
|
||
|
||
HTTP Authentication: SPNEGO Access Authentication
|
||
As implemented in Microsoft Windows 2000
|
||
|
||
|
||
Status of this Memo
|
||
|
||
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
|
||
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 [1]. Internet-Drafts are
|
||
working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its
|
||
areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also
|
||
distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are
|
||
draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be
|
||
updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It
|
||
is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference material or to
|
||
cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
||
|
||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
|
||
|
||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
|
||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
|
||
|
||
1. Abstract
|
||
|
||
This document describes how the Microsoft Internet Explorer (MSIE)
|
||
and Internet Information Services (IIS) incorporated in Microsoft
|
||
Windows 2000 use Kerberos for security enhancements of web
|
||
transactions. The HTTP auth-scheme of "negotiate" is defined here;
|
||
when the negotiation results in the selection of Kerberos, the
|
||
security services of authentication and optionally impersonation are
|
||
performed.
|
||
|
||
This document explains how HTTP authentication utilizes the SPNEGO
|
||
[7] GSSAPI mechanism. Details of SPNEGO implementation are not
|
||
provided in this document.
|
||
|
||
|
||
2. Conventions used in this document
|
||
|
||
In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
|
||
server respectively.
|
||
|
||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
|
||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
|
||
this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [3].
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Brezak Category - Informational 1
|
||
HTTP SPNEGO Access Authentication October 2002
|
||
|
||
3. Access Authentication
|
||
|
||
3.1 Reliance on the HTTP/1.1 Specification
|
||
|
||
This specification is a companion to the HTTP/1.1 specification [4]
|
||
and builds on the authentication mechanisms defined in [5]. It uses
|
||
the augmented BNF section 2.1 of that document, and relies on both
|
||
the non-terminals defined in that document and other aspects of the
|
||
HTTP/1.1 specification.
|
||
|
||
|
||
4. HTTP Negotiate Authentication Scheme
|
||
|
||
Use of Kerberos is wrapped in an HTTP auth-scheme of "Negotiate".
|
||
The auth-params exchanged use data formats defined for use with the
|
||
GSS-API [6]. In particular, they follow the formats set for the
|
||
SPNEGO [7] and Kerberos [8] mechanisms for GSSAPI. The "Negotiate"
|
||
auth-scheme calls for the use of SPNEGO GSSAPI tokens which the
|
||
specific mechanism type specifies.
|
||
|
||
The current implementation of this protocol is limited to the use of
|
||
SPNEGO with the Kerberos and Microsoft NTLM protocols.
|
||
|
||
4.1 The WWW-Authenticate Response Header
|
||
|
||
If the server receives a request for an access-protected object, and
|
||
an acceptable Authorization header has not been sent, the server
|
||
responds with a "401 Unauthorized" status code, and a "WWW-
|
||
Authenticate:" header as per the framework described in [4]. The
|
||
initial WWW-Authenticate header will not carry any gssapi-data.
|
||
|
||
The negotiate scheme will operate as follows:
|
||
|
||
challenge = "Negotiate" auth-data
|
||
auth-data = 1#( [gssapi-data] )
|
||
|
||
The meanings of the values of the directives used above are as
|
||
follows:
|
||
|
||
gssapi-data
|
||
If the gss_accept_security_context return a token for the
|
||
client, this directive contains the base64 encoding of an
|
||
InitialContextToken as defined in [6]. This is not present in
|
||
the initial response from the server.
|
||
|
||
A status code 200 status response can also carry a "WWW-
|
||
Authenticate" response header containing the final leg of an
|
||
authentication. In this case, the gssapi-data will be present.
|
||
Before using the contents of the response, the gssapi-data should be
|
||
processed by gss_init_security_context to determine the state of the
|
||
security context. If this function indicates success, the response
|
||
can be used by the application. Otherwise an appropriate action
|
||
based on the authentication status should be.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Brezak Category - Informational 2
|
||
HTTP SPNEGO Access Authentication October 2002
|
||
|
||
For example the authentication could have failed on the final leg if
|
||
mutual authentication was requested and the server was not able to
|
||
prove its identity. In this case, the returned results are suspect.
|
||
It is not always possible to mutually authenticate the server before
|
||
the HTTP operation. POST methods are in this category.
|
||
|
||
When the Kerberos Version 5 GSSAPI mechanism [RFC-1964] is being
|
||
used, the HTTP server will be using a principal name of the form of
|
||
"HTTP/<hostname>".
|
||
|
||
4.2 The Authorization Request Header
|
||
|
||
Upon receipt of the response containing a "WWW-Authenticate" header
|
||
from the server, the client is expected to retry the HTTP request,
|
||
passing a HTTP "Authorization" header line. This is defined
|
||
according to the framework described in [4] utilized as follows:
|
||
|
||
credentials = "Negotiate" auth-data2
|
||
auth-data2 = 1#( gssapi-data )
|
||
|
||
gssapi-data
|
||
This directive contains is the base64 encoding of an
|
||
InitialContextToken as defined in [6].
|
||
|
||
Any returned code other than a success 2xx code represents an
|
||
authentication error. If a 401 containing a "WWW-Authenticate"
|
||
header with "Negotiate" and gssapi-data is returned from the server,
|
||
it is a continuation of the authentication request.
|
||
|
||
A client may initiate a connection to the server with an
|
||
"Authorization" header containing the initial token for the server.
|
||
This form will bypass the initial 401 error from the server when the
|
||
client knows that the server will accept the Negotiate HTTP
|
||
authentication type.
|
||
|
||
5. Negotiate Operation Example
|
||
|
||
The client requests an access-protected document from server via a
|
||
GET method request. The URI of the document is
|
||
"http://www.nowhere.org/dir/index.html".
|
||
|
||
C: GET dir/index.html
|
||
|
||
The first time the client requests the document, no Authorization
|
||
header is sent, so the server responds with:
|
||
|
||
S: HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
|
||
S: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate
|
||
|
||
The client will obtain the user credentials using the SPNEGO GSSAPI
|
||
mechanism type to identify generate a GSSAPI message to be sent to
|
||
the server with a new request, including the following Authorization
|
||
header:
|
||
|
||
|
||
Brezak Category - Informational 3
|
||
HTTP SPNEGO Access Authentication October 2002
|
||
|
||
C: GET dir/index.html
|
||
C: Authorization: Negotiate a87421000492aa874209af8bc028
|
||
|
||
The server will decode the gssapi-data and pass this to the SPNEGO
|
||
GSSAPI mechanism in the gss_accept_security_context function. If the
|
||
context is not complete, the server will respond with a 401 status
|
||
code with a WWW-Authenticate header containing the gssapi-data.
|
||
|
||
S: HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
|
||
S: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate 749efa7b23409c20b92356
|
||
|
||
The client will decode the gssapi-data and pass this into
|
||
gss_init_security_context and return the new gssapi-data to the
|
||
server.
|
||
|
||
C: GET dir/index.html
|
||
C: Authorization: Negotiate 89a8742aa8729a8b028
|
||
|
||
This cycle can continue until the security context is complete.
|
||
|
||
When the return value from the gss_accept_security_context function
|
||
indicates that the security context is complete, it may supply final
|
||
authentication data to be returned to the client. If the server has
|
||
more gssapi data to send to the client to complete the context it is
|
||
to be carried in WWW-Authenticate header with the final response
|
||
containing the HTTP body.
|
||
|
||
S: HTTP/1.1 200 Success
|
||
S: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate ade0234568a4209af8bc0280289eca
|
||
|
||
The client will decode the gssapi-data and supply it to
|
||
gss_init_security_context using the context for this server. If the
|
||
status is successful from the final gss_init_security_context, the
|
||
response can be used by the application.
|
||
|
||
7. Security Considerations
|
||
|
||
The SPNEGO HTTP authentication facility is only used to provide
|
||
authentication of a user to server. It provides no facilities for
|
||
protecting the HTTP headers or data including the Authorization and
|
||
WWW-Authenticate headers that are used to implement this mechanism.
|
||
|
||
This mechanism is not used for HTTP authentication to HTTP proxies.
|
||
|
||
If an HTTP proxy is used between the client and server, it must take
|
||
care to not share authenticated connections between different
|
||
authenticated clients to the same server. If this is not honored,
|
||
then the server can easily lose track of security context
|
||
associations. A proxy that correctly honors client to server
|
||
authentication integrity will supply the "Proxy-support: Session-
|
||
Based-Authentication" HTTP header to the client in HTTP responses
|
||
from the proxy. The client MUST NOT utilize the SPNEGO HTTP
|
||
authentication mechanism through a proxy unless the proxy supplies
|
||
this header with the "401 Unauthorized" response from the server.
|
||
|
||
Brezak Category - Informational 4
|
||
HTTP SPNEGO Access Authentication October 2002
|
||
|
||
|
||
When using the SPNEGO HTTP authentication facility with client
|
||
supplied data such as PUT and POST, the authentication should be
|
||
complete between the client and server before sending the user data.
|
||
The return status from the gss_init_security_context will indicate
|
||
with the security context is complete. At this point the data can be
|
||
sent to the server.
|
||
|
||
|
||
8. References
|
||
|
||
|
||
1 Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP
|
||
9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
|
||
|
||
3 Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
|
||
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997
|
||
|
||
4 Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L.,
|
||
Leach, P. and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol --
|
||
HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
|
||
|
||
5 Franks, J., Hallam-Baker, P., Hostetler, J., Lawrence, S., Leach,
|
||
P., Luotonen, A., Stewart, L., "HTTP Authentication: Basic and
|
||
Digest Access Authentication", RFC 2617, June 1999.
|
||
|
||
6 Linn, J., "Generic Security Service Application Program Interface,
|
||
Version 2", RFC 2078, January 1997.
|
||
|
||
7 Baize, E., Pinkas, D., "The Simple and Protected GSS-API
|
||
Negotiation Mechanism", RFC 2478, December 1998.
|
||
|
||
8 Linn, J., "The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism", RFC 1964,
|
||
June 1996.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
10. Author's Addresses
|
||
|
||
John Brezak
|
||
Microsoft
|
||
One Microsoft Way
|
||
Redmond, Washington
|
||
Email: jbrezak@microsoft.com
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Brezak Category - Informational 5
|
||
HTTP SPNEGO Access Authentication October 2002
|
||
|
||
|
||
Full Copyright Statement
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001). All Rights Reserved.
|
||
|
||
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
|
||
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
|
||
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
|
||
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
|
||
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
|
||
are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
|
||
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
|
||
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
|
||
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
|
||
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
|
||
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
|
||
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
|
||
English.
|
||
|
||
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
|
||
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
|
||
|
||
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
|
||
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
|
||
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
|
||
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
|
||
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
|
||
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Brezak Category - Informational 6 |