mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-25 23:21:54 +03:00
863 lines
41 KiB
XML
863 lines
41 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
|
|
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//Samba-Team//DTD DocBook V4.2-Based Variant V1.0//EN" "http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc">
|
|
<chapter id="samba-bdc">
|
|
|
|
<chapterinfo>
|
|
&author.jht;
|
|
&author.vl;
|
|
<author>&person.gd;<contrib>LDAP updates</contrib></author>
|
|
</chapterinfo>
|
|
|
|
<title>Backup Domain Control</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Before you continue reading this section, please make sure that you are comfortable
|
|
with configuring a Samba domain controller as described in <link linkend="samba-pdc">Domain Control</link>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Features and Benefits</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
This is one of the most difficult chapters to summarize. It does not matter what we say here, for someone will
|
|
still draw conclusions and/or approach the Samba Team with expectations that are either not yet capable of
|
|
being delivered or that can be achieved far more effectively using a totally different approach. In the event
|
|
that you should have a persistent concern that is not addressed in this book, please email <ulink
|
|
url="mailto:jht@samba.org">John H. Terpstra</ulink> clearly setting out your requirements and/or question, and
|
|
we will do our best to provide a solution.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM backend</primary><secondary>LDAP</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>slave</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>scalability</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba-3 can act as a Backup Domain Controller (BDC) to another Samba Primary Domain Controller (PDC). A
|
|
Samba-3 PDC can operate with an LDAP account backend. The LDAP backend can be either a common master LDAP
|
|
server or a slave server. The use of a slave LDAP server has the benefit that when the master is down, clients
|
|
may still be able to log onto the network. This effectively gives Samba a high degree of scalability and is
|
|
an effective solution for large organizations. If you use an LDAP slave server for a PDC, you will need to
|
|
ensure the master's continued availability &smbmdash; if the slave finds its master down at the wrong time,
|
|
you will have stability and operational problems.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>two-way</primary><secondary>propagation</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>non-LDAP</primary><secondary>backend</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>propagate</primary></indexterm>
|
|
While it is possible to run a Samba-3 BDC with a non-LDAP backend, that backend must allow some form of
|
|
"two-way" propagation of changes from the BDC to the master. At this time only LDAP delivers the capability
|
|
to propagate identity database changes from the BDC to the PDC. The BDC can use a slave LDAP server, while it
|
|
is preferable for the PDC to use as its primary an LDAP master server.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>non-LDAP</primary><secondary>backend</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM backend</primary><secondary>non-LDAP</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>member</secondary><tertiary>server</tertiary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>trust account password</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain trust</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The use of a non-LDAP backend SAM database is particularly problematic because domain member
|
|
servers and workstations periodically change the Machine Trust Account password. The new
|
|
password is then stored only locally. This means that in the absence of a centrally stored
|
|
accounts database (such as that provided with an LDAP-based solution) if Samba-3 is running
|
|
as a BDC, the BDC instance of the domain member trust account password will not reach the
|
|
PDC (master) copy of the SAM. If the PDC SAM is then replicated to BDCs, this results in
|
|
overwriting the SAM that contains the updated (changed) trust account password with resulting
|
|
breakage of the domain trust.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>net</primary><secondary>rpc</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM backend</primary><secondary>ldapsam</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM backend</primary><secondary>tdbsam</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
Considering the number of comments and questions raised concerning how to configure a BDC,
|
|
let's consider each possible option and look at the pros and cons for each possible solution.
|
|
<link linkend="pdc-bdc-table">The Domain Backend Account Distribution Options table below</link> lists
|
|
possible design configurations for a PDC/BDC infrastructure.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<table frame="all" id="pdc-bdc-table"><title>Domain Backend Account Distribution Options</title>
|
|
<tgroup cols="3">
|
|
<colspec align="center" colwidth="1*"/>
|
|
<colspec align="center" colwidth="1*"/>
|
|
<colspec align="left" colwidth="3*"/>
|
|
|
|
<thead>
|
|
<row><entry>PDC Backend</entry><entry>BDC Backend</entry><entry>Notes/Discussion</entry></row>
|
|
</thead>
|
|
<tbody>
|
|
<row>
|
|
<entry><para>Master LDAP Server</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>Slave LDAP Server</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>The optimal solution that provides high integrity. The SAM will be
|
|
replicated to a common master LDAP server.</para></entry>
|
|
</row>
|
|
<row>
|
|
<entry><para>Single Central LDAP Server</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>Single Central LDAP Server</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>
|
|
A workable solution without failover ability. This is a usable solution, but not optimal.
|
|
</para></entry>
|
|
</row>
|
|
<row>
|
|
<entry><para>tdbsam</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>tdbsam + <command>net rpc vampire</command></para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>
|
|
Does not work with Samba-3.0; Samba does not implement the
|
|
server-side protocols required.
|
|
</para></entry>
|
|
</row>
|
|
<row>
|
|
<entry><para>tdbsam</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>tdbsam + <command>rsync</command></para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>
|
|
Do not use this configuration.
|
|
Does not work because the TDB files are live and data may not
|
|
have been flushed to disk. Furthermore, this will cause
|
|
domain trust breakdown.
|
|
</para></entry>
|
|
</row>
|
|
<row>
|
|
<entry><para>smbpasswd file</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>smbpasswd file</para></entry>
|
|
<entry><para>
|
|
Do not use this configuration.
|
|
Not an elegant solution due to the delays in synchronization
|
|
and also suffers
|
|
from the issue of domain trust breakdown.
|
|
</para></entry>
|
|
</row>
|
|
</tbody>
|
|
</tgroup>
|
|
</table>
|
|
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Essential Background Information</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>logon requests</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LanMan</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Netlogon</primary></indexterm>
|
|
A domain controller is a machine that is able to answer logon requests from network
|
|
workstations. Microsoft LanManager and IBM LanServer were two early products that
|
|
provided this capability. The technology has become known as the LanMan Netlogon service.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>logon</secondary><tertiary>service</tertiary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Windows NT3.10</primary></indexterm>
|
|
When MS Windows NT3.10 was first released, it supported a new style of Domain Control
|
|
and with it a new form of the network logon service that has extended functionality.
|
|
This service became known as the NT NetLogon Service. The nature of this service has
|
|
changed with the evolution of MS Windows NT and today provides a complex array of
|
|
services that are implemented over an intricate spectrum of technologies.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>MS Windows NT4-style Domain Control</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>authentication server</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>username</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>password</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Security Account Manager</primary><see>SAM</see></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain control database</primary><see>SAM</see></indexterm>
|
|
Whenever a user logs into a Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional workstation,
|
|
the workstation connects to a domain controller (authentication server) to validate that
|
|
the username and password the user entered are valid. If the information entered
|
|
does not match account information that has been stored in the domain
|
|
control database (the SAM, or Security Account Manager database), a set of error
|
|
codes is returned to the workstation that has made the authentication request.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>account information</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>machine accounts database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>profile</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network access profile</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>desktop profile</primary></indexterm>
|
|
When the username/password pair has been validated, the domain controller
|
|
(authentication server) will respond with full enumeration of the account information
|
|
that has been stored regarding that user in the user and machine accounts database
|
|
for that domain. This information contains a complete network access profile for
|
|
the user but excludes any information that is particular to the user's desktop profile,
|
|
or for that matter it excludes all desktop profiles for groups that the user may
|
|
belong to. It does include password time limits, password uniqueness controls,
|
|
network access time limits, account validity information, machine names from which the
|
|
user may access the network, and much more. All this information was stored in the SAM
|
|
in all versions of MS Windows NT (3.10, 3.50, 3.51, 4.0).
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>%SystemRoot%\System32\config</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>C:\WinNT\System32\config</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The account information (user and machine) on domain controllers is stored in two files,
|
|
one containing the security information and the other the SAM. These are stored in files
|
|
by the same name in the <filename>%SystemRoot%\System32\config</filename> directory.
|
|
This normally translates to the path <filename>C:\WinNT\System32\config</filename>. These
|
|
are the files that are involved in replication of the SAM database where BDCs are present
|
|
on the network.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
There are two situations in which it is desirable to install BDCs:
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
On the local network that the PDC is on, if there are many
|
|
workstations and/or where the PDC is generally very busy. In this case the BDCs
|
|
will pick up network logon requests and help to add robustness to network services.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>wide-area</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
At each remote site, to reduce wide-area network traffic and to add stability to
|
|
remote network operations. The design of the network, and the strategic placement of
|
|
BDCs, together with an implementation that localizes as much of network to client
|
|
interchange as possible, will help to minimize wide-area network bandwidth needs
|
|
(and thus costs).
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>user account database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>trigger</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The interoperation of a PDC and its BDCs in a true Windows NT4 environment is worth
|
|
mentioning here. The PDC contains the master copy of the SAM. In the event that an
|
|
administrator makes a change to the user account database while physically present
|
|
on the local network that has the PDC, the change will likely be made directly to
|
|
the PDC instance of the master copy of the SAM. In the event that this update may
|
|
be performed in a branch office, the change will likely be stored in a delta file
|
|
on the local BDC. The BDC will then send a trigger to the PDC to commence the process
|
|
of SAM synchronization. The PDC will then request the delta from the BDC and apply
|
|
it to the master SAM. The PDC will then contact all the BDCs in the domain and
|
|
trigger them to obtain the update and then apply that to their own copy of the SAM.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary><secondary>replication</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary><secondary>delta file</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba-3 cannot participate in true SAM replication and is therefore not able to
|
|
employ precisely the same protocols used by MS Windows NT4. A Samba-3 BDC will
|
|
not create SAM update delta files. It will not interoperate with a PDC (NT4 or Samba)
|
|
to synchronize the SAM from delta files that are held by BDCs.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba-3 cannot function as a BDC to an MS Windows NT4 PDC, and Samba-3 cannot
|
|
function correctly as a PDC to an MS Windows NT4 BDC. Both Samba-3 and MS Windows
|
|
NT4 can function as a BDC to its own type of PDC.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain security</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The BDC is said to hold a <emphasis>read-only</emphasis> of the SAM from which
|
|
it is able to process network logon requests and authenticate users. The BDC can
|
|
continue to provide this service, particularly while, for example, the wide-area
|
|
network link to the PDC is down. A BDC plays a very important role in both the
|
|
maintenance of domain security as well as in network integrity.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>promoted</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>demoted</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>reconfiguration</primary></indexterm>
|
|
In the event that the NT4 PDC should need to be taken out of service, or if it dies, one of the NT4 BDCs can
|
|
be promoted to a PDC. If this happens while the original NT4 PDC is online, it is automatically demoted to an
|
|
NT4 BDC. This is an important aspect of domain controller management. The tool that is used to effect a
|
|
promotion or a demotion is the Server Manager for Domains. It should be noted that Samba-3 BDCs cannot be
|
|
promoted in this manner because reconfiguration of Samba requires changes to the &smb.conf; file. It is easy
|
|
enough to manuall change the &smb.conf; file and then restart relevant Samba network services.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>Example PDC Configuration</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain logon</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Beginning with Version 2.2, Samba officially supports domain logons for all current Windows clients, including
|
|
Windows NT4, 2003, and XP Professional. For Samba to be enabled as a PDC, some parameters in the
|
|
<smbconfsection name="[global]"/> section of the &smb.conf; have to be set. Refer to <link
|
|
linkend="minimalPDC">the Minimal smb.conf for a PDC in Use with a BDC &smbmdash; LDAP Server on PDC
|
|
section</link> for an example of the minimum required settings.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<example id="minimalPDC">
|
|
<title>Minimal smb.conf for a PDC in Use with a BDC &smbmdash; LDAP Server on PDC</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="workgroup">&example.workgroup;</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam://localhost:389</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain master">yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap suffix">dc=quenya,dc=org</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap user suffix">ou=Users</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap group suffix">ou=Groups</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap machine suffix">ou=Computers</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix">ou=Idmap</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn">cn=sambadmin,dc=quenya,dc=org</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>profile path</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>home drive</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Several other things like a <smbconfsection name="[homes]"/> and a <smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/> share
|
|
also need to be set along with settings for the profile path, the user's home drive, and so on. This is not
|
|
covered in this chapter; for more information please refer to <link linkend="samba-pdc">Domain Control</link>.
|
|
Refer to <link linkend="samba-pdc">the Domain Control chapter</link> for specific recommendations for PDC
|
|
configuration. Alternately, fully documented working example network configurations using OpenLDAP and Samba
|
|
as available in the <ulink url="http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample">book</ulink> <quote>Samba-3
|
|
by Example</quote> that may be obtained from local and on-line book stores.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>LDAP Configuration Notes</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>master</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>slave</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
When configuring a master and a slave LDAP server, it is advisable to use the master LDAP server
|
|
for the PDC and slave LDAP servers for the BDCs. It is not essential to use slave LDAP servers; however,
|
|
many administrators will want to do so in order to provide redundant services. Of course, one or more BDCs
|
|
may use any slave LDAP server. Then again, it is entirely possible to use a single LDAP server for the
|
|
entire network.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>master</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>server</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>CN</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DN</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>RFC2830</primary></indexterm>
|
|
When configuring a master LDAP server that will have slave LDAP servers, do not forget to configure this in
|
|
the <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename> file. It must be noted that the DN of a server certificate
|
|
must use the CN attribute to name the server, and the CN must carry the servers' fully qualified domain name.
|
|
Additional alias names and wildcards may be present in the subjectAltName certificate extension. More details
|
|
on server certificate names are in RFC2830.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>transport layer security</primary><see>TLS</see></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>/etc/ssl/certs/slapd.pem</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>slapd.pem</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Red Hat Linux</primary></indexterm>
|
|
It does not really fit within the scope of this document, but a working LDAP installation is basic to
|
|
LDAP-enabled Samba operation. When using an OpenLDAP server with Transport Layer Security (TLS), the machine
|
|
name in <filename>/etc/ssl/certs/slapd.pem</filename> must be the same as in
|
|
<filename>/etc/openldap/sldap.conf</filename>. The Red Hat Linux startup script creates the
|
|
<filename>slapd.pem</filename> file with hostname <quote>localhost.localdomain.</quote> It is impossible to
|
|
access this LDAP server from a slave LDAP server (i.e., a Samba BDC) unless the certificate is re-created with
|
|
a correct hostname.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>machine account</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>credentials</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>duplicate</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Do not install a Samba PDC so that is uses an LDAP slave server. Joining client machines to the domain
|
|
will fail in this configuration because the change to the machine account in the LDAP tree must take place on
|
|
the master LDAP server. This is not replicated rapidly enough to the slave server that the PDC queries. It
|
|
therefore gives an error message on the client machine about not being able to set up account credentials. The
|
|
machine account is created on the LDAP server, but the password fields will be empty. Unfortunately, some
|
|
sites are unable to avoid such configurations, and these sites should review the <smbconfoption name="ldap
|
|
replication sleep"/> parameter, intended to slow down Samba sufficiently for the replication to catch up.
|
|
This is a kludge, and one that the administrator must manually duplicate in any scripts (such as the
|
|
<smbconfoption name="add machine script"/>) that they use.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Possible PDC/BDC plus LDAP configurations include:
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
PDC+BDC -> One Central LDAP Server.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
PDC -> LDAP master server, BDC -> LDAP slave server.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
PDC -> LDAP master, with secondary slave LDAP server.
|
|
</para><para>
|
|
BDC -> LDAP master, with secondary slave LDAP server.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
PDC -> LDAP master, with secondary slave LDAP server.
|
|
</para><para>
|
|
BDC -> LDAP slave server, with secondary master LDAP server.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
In order to have a fallback configuration (secondary) LDAP server, you would specify
|
|
the secondary LDAP server in the &smb.conf; file as shown in <link linkend="mulitldapcfg">the Multiple LDAP
|
|
Servers in &smb.conf; example</link>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<example id="mulitldapcfg">
|
|
<title>Multiple LDAP Servers in &smb.conf;</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam:"ldap://master.quenya.org ldap://slave.quenya.org"</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Active Directory Domain Control</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>MS Windows 2000</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Active Directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replicated</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|
As of the release of MS Windows 2000 and Active Directory, this information is now stored
|
|
in a directory that can be replicated and for which partial or full administrative control
|
|
can be delegated. Samba-3 is not able to be a domain controller within an Active Directory
|
|
tree, and it cannot be an Active Directory server. This means that Samba-3 also cannot
|
|
act as a BDC to an Active Directory domain controller.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>What Qualifies a Domain Controller on the Network?</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DMB</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Every machine that is a domain controller for the domain MIDEARTH has to register the NetBIOS
|
|
group name MIDEARTH<1C> with the WINS server and/or by broadcast on the local network.
|
|
The PDC also registers the unique NetBIOS name MIDEARTH<1B> with the WINS server.
|
|
The name type <1B> name is normally reserved for the Domain Master Browser (DMB), a role
|
|
that has nothing to do with anything related to authentication, but the Microsoft domain
|
|
implementation requires the DMB to be on the same machine as the PDC.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>broadcast</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>name registration</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SMB/CIFS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Where a WINS server is not used, broadcast name registrations alone must suffice. Refer to
|
|
<link linkend="NetworkBrowsing">Network Browsing</link>,<link linkend="netdiscuss">Discussion</link>
|
|
for more information regarding TCP/IP network protocols and how SMB/CIFS names are handled.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>How Does a Workstation find its Domain Controller?</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>locate domain controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
There are two different mechanisms to locate a domain controller: one method is used when
|
|
NetBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled and the other when it has been disabled in the TCP/IP
|
|
network configuration.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DNS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>broadcast messaging</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Where NetBIOS over TCP/IP is disabled, all name resolution involves the use of DNS, broadcast
|
|
messaging over UDP, as well as Active Directory communication technologies. In this type of
|
|
environment all machines require appropriate DNS entries. More information may be found in
|
|
<link linkend="adsdnstech">DNS and Active Directory</link>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>NetBIOS Over TCP/IP Enabled</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Windows NT4/200x/XP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>logon requests</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>credentials validation</primary></indexterm>
|
|
An MS Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional workstation in the domain MIDEARTH that wants a
|
|
local user to be authenticated has to find the domain controller for MIDEARTH. It does this
|
|
by doing a NetBIOS name query for the group name MIDEARTH<1C>. It assumes that each
|
|
of the machines it gets back from the queries is a domain controller and can answer logon
|
|
requests. To not open security holes, both the workstation and the selected domain controller
|
|
authenticate each other. After that the workstation sends the user's credentials (name and
|
|
password) to the local domain controller for validation.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
|
|
<sect3>
|
|
<title>NetBIOS Over TCP/IP Disabled</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>realm</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>logon authentication</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>DNS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>_ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.quenya.org</primary></indexterm>
|
|
An MS Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional workstation in the realm <constant>quenya.org</constant>
|
|
that has a need to affect user logon authentication will locate the domain controller by
|
|
re-querying DNS servers for the <constant>_ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.quenya.org</constant> record.
|
|
More information regarding this subject may be found in <link linkend="adsdnstech">DNS and Active Directory</link>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect3>
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Backup Domain Controller Configuration</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The creation of a BDC requires some steps to prepare the Samba server before
|
|
&smbd; is executed for the first time. These steps are as follows:
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<itemizedlist>
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>private/secrets.tdb</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>private/MACHINE.SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The domain SID has to be the same on the PDC and the BDC. In Samba versions pre-2.2.5, the domain SID was
|
|
stored in the file <filename>private/MACHINE.SID</filename>. For all versions of Samba released since 2.2.5
|
|
the domain SID is stored in the file <filename>private/secrets.tdb</filename>. This file is unique to each
|
|
server and cannot be copied from a PDC to a BDC; the BDC will generate a new SID at startup. It will overwrite
|
|
the PDC domain SID with the newly created BDC SID. There is a procedure that will allow the BDC to acquire the
|
|
domain SID. This is described here.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>secrets.tdb</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>net</primary><secondary>rpc</secondary><tertiary>getsid</tertiary></indexterm>
|
|
To retrieve the domain SID from the PDC or an existing BDC and store it in the
|
|
<filename>secrets.tdb</filename>, execute:
|
|
</para>
|
|
<screen>
|
|
&rootprompt;<userinput>net rpc getsid</userinput>
|
|
</screen>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>secrets.tdb</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP administration password</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Specification of the <smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn"/> is obligatory.
|
|
This also requires the LDAP administration password to be set in the <filename>secrets.tdb</filename>
|
|
using the <command>smbpasswd -w <replaceable>mysecret</replaceable></command>.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
The <smbconfoption name="ldap suffix"/> parameter and the <smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix"/>
|
|
parameter must be specified in the &smb.conf; file.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>user database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>synchronized</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The UNIX user database has to be synchronized from the PDC to the
|
|
BDC. This means that both the <filename>/etc/passwd</filename> and
|
|
<filename>/etc/group</filename> have to be replicated from the PDC
|
|
to the BDC. This can be done manually whenever changes are made.
|
|
Alternately, the PDC is set up as an NIS master server and the BDC as an NIS slave
|
|
server. To set up the BDC as a mere NIS client would not be enough,
|
|
as the BDC would not be able to access its user database in case of
|
|
a PDC failure. NIS is by no means the only method to synchronize
|
|
passwords. An LDAP solution would also work.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>password database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replicated</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>rsync</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>ssh</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The Samba password database must be replicated from the PDC to the BDC.
|
|
Although it is possible to synchronize the <filename>smbpasswd</filename>
|
|
file with <command>rsync</command> and <command>ssh</command>, this method
|
|
is broken and flawed, and is therefore not recommended. A better solution
|
|
is to set up slave LDAP servers for each BDC and a master LDAP server for the PDC.
|
|
The use of rsync is inherently flawed by the fact that the data will be replicated
|
|
at timed intervals. There is no guarantee that the BDC will be operating at all
|
|
times with correct and current machine and user account information. This means that
|
|
this method runs the risk of users being inconvenienced by discontinuity of access
|
|
to network services due to inconsistent security data. It must be born in mind that
|
|
Windows workstations update (change) the machine trust account password at regular
|
|
intervals &smbmdash; administrators are not normally aware that this is happening
|
|
or when it takes place.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>POSIX</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SambaSAMAccount</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>synchronize</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The use of LDAP for both the POSIX (UNIX user and group) accounts and for the
|
|
SambaSAMAccount data automatically ensures that all account change information
|
|
will be written to the shared directory. This eliminates the need for any special
|
|
action to synchronize account information because LDAP will meet that requirement.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
<listitem><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>netlogon share</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replicate</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>cron</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>rsync</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The netlogon share has to be replicated from the PDC to the BDC. This can be done manually whenever login
|
|
scripts are changed, or it can be done automatically using a <command>cron</command> job that will replicate
|
|
the directory structure in this share using a tool like <command>rsync</command>. The use of
|
|
<command>rsync</command> for replication of the netlogon data is not critical to network security and is one
|
|
that can be manually managed given that the administrator will make all changes to the netlogon share as part
|
|
of a conscious move.
|
|
</para></listitem>
|
|
|
|
</itemizedlist>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Example Configuration</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Finally, the BDC has to be capable of being found by the workstations. This can be done by configuring the
|
|
Samba &smb.conf; file <smbconfsection name="[global]"/> section as shown in <link linkend="minim-bdc">Minimal
|
|
Setup for Being a BDC</link>.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<example id="minim-bdc">
|
|
<title>Minimal Setup for Being a BDC</title>
|
|
<smbconfblock>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="workgroup">&example.workgroup;</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam:ldap://slave-ldap.quenya.org</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain master">no</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">yes</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap suffix">dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap user suffix">ou=Users</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap group suffix">ou=Groups</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap machine suffix">ou=Computers</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix">ou=Idmap</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn">cn=sambadmin,dc=quenya,dc=org</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap backend">ldap:ldap://master-ldap.quenya.org</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap uid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|
<smbconfoption name="idmap gid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|
</smbconfblock>
|
|
</example>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
Fully documented working example network configurations using OpenLDAP and Samba
|
|
as available in the <ulink url="http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample">book</ulink> <quote>Samba-3
|
|
by Example</quote> that may be obtained from local and on-line book stores.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>group</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
This configuration causes the BDC to register only the name MIDEARTH<1C> with the WINS server. This is
|
|
not a problem, as the name MIDEARTH<1C> is a NetBIOS group name that is meant to be registered by more
|
|
than one machine. The parameter <smbconfoption name="domain master">no</smbconfoption> forces the BDC not to
|
|
register MIDEARTH<1B>, which is a unique NetBIOS name that is reserved for the PDC.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>idmap backend</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>winbindd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>redirect</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>winbindd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP database</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>UID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>GID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>nss_ldap</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The <parameter>idmap backend</parameter> will redirect the <command>winbindd</command> utility to use the LDAP
|
|
database to store all mappings for Windows SIDs to UIDs and GIDs for UNIX accounts in a repository that is
|
|
shared. The BDC will however depend on local resolution of UIDs and GIDs via NSS and the
|
|
<command>nss_ldap</command> utility.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<note><para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Server Type</primary><secondary>Domain Member</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>ID mapping</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain member server</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>idmap backend</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Samba-3 has introduced a new ID mapping facility. One of the features of this facility is that it
|
|
allows greater flexibility in how user and group IDs are handled in respect to NT domain user and group
|
|
SIDs. One of the new facilities provides for explicitly ensuring that UNIX/Linux UID and GID values
|
|
will be consistent on the PDC, all BDCs, and all domain member servers. The parameter that controls this
|
|
is called <parameter>idmap backend</parameter>. Please refer to the man page for &smb.conf; for more information
|
|
regarding its behavior.
|
|
</para></note>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>winbindd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain member servers</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The use of the <smbconfoption name="idmap backend">ldap:ldap://master.quenya.org</smbconfoption>
|
|
option on a BDC only makes sense where ldapsam is used on a PDC. The purpose of an LDAP-based idmap backend is
|
|
also to allow a domain member (without its own passdb backend) to use winbindd to resolve Windows network users
|
|
and groups to common UID/GIDs. In other words, this option is generally intended for use on BDCs and on domain
|
|
member servers.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
|
|
<sect1>
|
|
<title>Common Errors</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>domain control</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Domain control was a new area for Samba, but there are now many examples that we may refer to.
|
|
Updated information will be published as they become available and may be found in later Samba releases or
|
|
from the Samba Web <ulink url="http://samba.org">site</ulink>; refer in particular to the
|
|
<filename>WHATSNEW.txt</filename> in the Samba release tarball. The book, <quote>Samba-3 by Example</quote>
|
|
documents well tested and proven configuration examples. You can obtain a copy of this
|
|
<ulink url="http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample.pdf">book</ulink> for the Samba web site.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Machine Accounts Keep Expiring</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Machine Trust Accounts</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>passdb</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>Local Machine Trust Account</primary></indexterm>
|
|
This problem will occur when the passdb (SAM) files are copied from a central
|
|
server but the local BDC is acting as a PDC. This results in the application of
|
|
Local Machine Trust Account password updates to the local SAM. Such updates
|
|
are not copied back to the central server. The newer machine account password is then
|
|
overwritten when the SAM is recopied from the PDC. The result is that the domain member machine
|
|
on startup will find that its passwords do not match the one now in the database, and
|
|
since the startup security check will now fail, this machine will not allow logon attempts
|
|
to proceed and the account expiry error will be reported.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
The solution is to use a more robust passdb backend, such as the ldapsam backend, setting up
|
|
a slave LDAP server for each BDC and a master LDAP server for the PDC.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Can Samba Be a Backup Domain Controller to an NT4 PDC?</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
No. The native NT4 SAM replication protocols have not yet been fully implemented.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>logon requests</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Can I get the benefits of a BDC with Samba? Yes, but only to a Samba PDC.The
|
|
main reason for implementing a BDC is availability. If the PDC is a Samba
|
|
machine, a second Samba machine can be set up to service logon requests whenever
|
|
the PDC is down.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>How Do I Replicate the smbpasswd File?</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
|
|
Replication of the smbpasswd file is sensitive. It has to be done whenever changes
|
|
to the SAM are made. Every user's password change is done in the smbpasswd file and
|
|
has to be replicated to the BDC. So replicating the smbpasswd file very often is necessary.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>plaintext password</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>ssh</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>rsync</primary></indexterm>
|
|
As the smbpasswd file contains plaintext password equivalents, it must not be
|
|
sent unencrypted over the wire. The best way to set up smbpasswd replication from
|
|
the PDC to the BDC is to use the utility rsync. rsync can use ssh as a transport.
|
|
<command>ssh</command> itself can be set up to accept <emphasis>only</emphasis>
|
|
<command>rsync</command> transfer without requiring the user to type a password.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>machine trust accounts</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
As said a few times before, use of this method is broken and flawed. Machine trust
|
|
accounts will go out of sync, resulting in a broken domain. This method is
|
|
<emphasis>not</emphasis> recommended. Try using LDAP instead.
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
|
|
<sect2>
|
|
<title>Can I Do This All with LDAP?</title>
|
|
|
|
<para>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>pdb_ldap</primary></indexterm>
|
|
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|
The simple answer is yes. Samba's pdb_ldap code supports binding to a replica
|
|
LDAP server and will also follow referrals and rebind to the master if it ever
|
|
needs to make a modification to the database. (Normally BDCs are read-only, so
|
|
this will not occur often).
|
|
</para>
|
|
|
|
</sect2>
|
|
</sect1>
|
|
</chapter>
|