mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-24 21:34:56 +03:00
135 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
135 lines
5.6 KiB
Plaintext
Samba Architecture
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
First preliminary version Dan Shearer Nov 97
|
|
Quickly scrabbled together from odd bits of mail and memory. Please update.
|
|
|
|
This document gives a general overview of how Samba works
|
|
internally. The Samba Team has tried to come up with a model which is
|
|
the best possible compromise between elegance, portability, security
|
|
and the constraints imposed by the very messy SMB and CIFS
|
|
protocol.
|
|
|
|
It also tries to answer some of the frequently asked questions such as:
|
|
|
|
* Is Samba secure when running on Unix? The xyz platform?
|
|
What about the root priveliges issue?
|
|
|
|
* Pros and cons of multithreading in various parts of Samba
|
|
|
|
* Why not have a separate process for name resolution, WINS,
|
|
and browsing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multithreading and Samba
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
People sometimes tout threads as a uniformly good thing. They are very
|
|
nice in their place but are quite inappropriate for smbd. nmbd is
|
|
another matter, and multi-threading it would be very nice.
|
|
|
|
The short version is that smbd is not multithreaded, and alternative
|
|
servers that take this approach under Unix (such as Syntax, at the
|
|
time of writing) suffer tremendous performance penalties and are less
|
|
robust. nmbd is not threaded either, but this is because it is not
|
|
possible to do it while keeping code consistent and portable across 35
|
|
or more platforms. (This drawback also applies to threading smbd.)
|
|
|
|
The longer versions is that there are very good reasons for not making
|
|
smbd multi-threaded. Multi-threading would actually make Samba much
|
|
slower, less scalable, less portable and much less robust. The fact
|
|
that we use a separate process for each connection is one of Samba's
|
|
biggest advantages.
|
|
|
|
Threading smbd
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
A few problems that would arise from a threaded smbd are:
|
|
|
|
0) It's not only to create threads instead of processes, but you
|
|
must care about all variables if they have to be thread specific
|
|
(currently they would be global).
|
|
|
|
1) if one thread dies (eg. a seg fault) then all threads die. We can
|
|
immediately throw robustness out the window.
|
|
|
|
2) many of the system calls we make are blocking. Non-blocking
|
|
equivalents of many calls are either not available or are awkward (and
|
|
slow) to use. So while we block in one thread all clients are
|
|
waiting. Imagine if one share is a slow NFS filesystem and the others
|
|
are fast, we will end up slowing all clients to the speed of NFS.
|
|
|
|
3) you can't run as a different uid in different threads. This means
|
|
we would have to switch uid/gid on _every_ SMB packet. It would be
|
|
horrendously slow.
|
|
|
|
4) the per process file descriptor limit would mean that we could only
|
|
support a limited number of clients.
|
|
|
|
5) we couldn't use the system locking calls as the locking context of
|
|
fcntl() is a process, not a thread.
|
|
|
|
Threading nmbd
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
This would be ideal, but gets sunk by portability requirements.
|
|
|
|
Andrew tried to write a test threads library for nmbd that used only
|
|
ansi-C constructs (using setjmp and longjmp). Unfortunately some OSes
|
|
defeat this by restricting longjmp to calling addresses that are
|
|
shallower than the current address on the stack (apparently AIX does
|
|
this). This makes a truly portable threads library impossible. So to
|
|
support all our current platforms we would have to code nmbd both with
|
|
and without threads, and as the real aim of threads is to make the
|
|
code clearer we would not have gained anything. (it is a myth that
|
|
threads make things faster. threading is like recursion, it can make
|
|
things clear but the same thing can always be done faster by some
|
|
other method)
|
|
|
|
Chris tried to spec out a general design that would abstract threading
|
|
vs separate processes (vs other methods?) and make them accessible
|
|
through some general API. This doesn't work because of the data
|
|
sharing requirements of the protocol (packets in the future depending
|
|
on packets now, etc.) At least, the code would work but would be very
|
|
clumsy, and besides the fork() type model would never work on Unix. (Is there an OS that it would work on, for nmbd?)
|
|
|
|
A fork() is cheap, but not nearly cheap enough to do on every UDP
|
|
packet that arrives. Having a pool of processes is possible but is
|
|
nasty to program cleanly due to the enormous amount of shared data (in
|
|
complex structures) between the processes. We can't rely on each
|
|
platform having a shared memory system.
|
|
|
|
nbmd Design
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
Originally Andrew used recursion to simulate a multi-threaded
|
|
environment, which use the stack enormously and made for really
|
|
confusing debugging sessions. Luke Leighton rewrote it to use a
|
|
queuing system that keeps state information on each packet. The
|
|
first version used a single structure which was used by all the
|
|
pending states. As the initialisation of this structure was
|
|
done by adding arguments, as the functionality developed, it got
|
|
pretty messy. So, it was replaced with a higher-order function
|
|
and a pointer to a user-defined memory block. This suddenly
|
|
made things much simpler: large numbers of functions could be
|
|
made static, and modularised. This is the same principle as used
|
|
in NT's kernel, and achieves the same effect as threads, but in
|
|
a single process.
|
|
|
|
Then Jeremy rewrote nmbd. The packet data in nmbd isn't what's on the
|
|
wire. It's a nice format that is very amenable to processing but still
|
|
keeps the idea of a distinct packet. See "struct packet_struct" in
|
|
nameserv.h. It has all the detail but none of the on-the-wire
|
|
mess. This makes it ideal for using in disk or memory-based databases
|
|
for browsing and WINS support.
|
|
|
|
nmbd now consists of a series of modules. It...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samba Design and Security
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
Why Isn't nmbd Multiple Daemons?
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|