IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Needed as there was a proposal to re-architect
our multi-lock to dispense with lock order precedence,
which isn't how Windows does it (unfortunately,
as the new code would have been cleaner :-).
Tested against the Win2k12 SMB1 implementation.
This test is designed to show that
lock precedence on the server is based
on the order received, not on the ability
to grant. For example:
A blocked lock request containing 2 locks
will be satified before a subsequent blocked
lock request over one of the same regions,
even if that region is then unlocked. E.g.
(a) lock 100->109, 120->129 (granted)
(b) lock 100->109, 120-129 (blocks)
(c) lock 100->109 (blocks)
(d) unlock 100->109
lock (c) will not be granted as lock (b)
will take precedence.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jul 8 10:16:59 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
c324b9f03f