IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Right now we're using a DWCAS to atomically set the running_mask while
being constrained by the thread_mask. This DWCAS is annoying because we
may seriously need it later when adding support for thread groups, for
checking that the running_mask applies to the correct group.
It turns out that the DWCAS is not strictly necessary because we never
need it to set the thread_mask based on the running_mask, only the other
way around. And in fact, the running_mask is always cleared alone, and
the thread_mask is changed alone as well. The running_mask is only
relevant to indicate a takeover when the thread_mask matches it. Any
bit set in running and not present in thread_mask indicates a transition
in progress.
As such, it is possible to re-arrange this by using a regular CAS around a
consistency check between running_mask and thread_mask in fd_update_events
and by making a CAS on running_mask then an atomic store on the thread_mask
in fd_takeover(). The only other case is fd_delete() but that one already
sets the running_mask before clearing the thread_mask, which is compatible
with the consistency check above.
This change has happily survived 10 billion takeovers on a 16-thread
machine at 800k requests/s.
The fd-migration doc was updated to reflect this change.
f69fea64e0
