sinjuginas/rpm-build
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
sisyphus
rpm-build/rpmrc.in

532 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
#/*! \page config_rpmrc Default configuration: /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc
# \verbatim
#
#
# This is a global RPM configuration file. All changes made here will
# be lost when the rpm package is upgraded. Any per-system configuration
# should be added to /etc/rpmrc, while per-user configuration should
# be added to ~/.rpmrc.
#
#############################################################
# Values for RPM_OPT_FLAGS for various platforms
Revert "rpmrc.in: Use -mtune=i686 instead of -mtune=generic for i[3456]86" This reverts commit 94a5f4988992799c74bfef24f6e06eed6dd4a6b2, which is almost 6 year old, and the rationale for it is no longer relevant.
2012-12-22 18:57:30 +04:00
optflags: i386 %optflags_default -march=i386 -mtune=generic
optflags: i486 %optflags_default -march=i486 -mtune=generic
optflags: i586 %optflags_default -march=i586 -mtune=generic
optflags: i686 %optflags_default -march=i686 -mtune=generic
rpmrc.in: use -mtune=generic for other x86 flavours
2012-12-22 19:02:31 +04:00
optflags: pentium2 %optflags_default -march=pentium2 -mtune=generic
optflags: pentium3 %optflags_default -march=pentium3 -mtune=generic
optflags: pentium4 %optflags_default -march=pentium4 -mtune=generic
optflags: k6 %optflags_default -march=k6 -mtune=generic
optflags: athlon %optflags_default -march=athlon -mtune=generic
optflags: athlon_xp %optflags_default -march=athlon-xp -mtune=generic
Added x86_64 support.
2005-06-16 20:18:15 +04:00
optflags: amd64 %optflags_default
sync with rpm4 branch
2002-03-26 01:32:55 +03:00
optflags: ia64 %optflags_default
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
optflags: ia32e %optflags_default
Added x86_64 support.
2005-06-16 20:18:15 +04:00
optflags: x86_64 %optflags_default
define optflags for noarch
2005-10-10 19:30:58 +04:00
optflags: noarch %optflags_default
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
Add e2k arch, subarches and all macros for them. Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@altlinux.org>
2018-03-26 20:39:57 +03:00
# mcst suggests -O3 instead of our default -O2; do that uncoditionally
# !!! changeme for lcc-1.23: -mcpu -> -march !!!
optflags: e2k %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-v3
optflags: e2kv4 %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-v4
optflags: e2kv5 %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-v5
optflags: e2kv6 %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-v6
# !!! changeme for lcc-1.23: -mcpu -> -mtune !!!
optflags: e2k4c %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-4c
optflags: e2k8c %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-8c
optflags: e2k1cp %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-1cp
optflags: e2k8c2 %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-8c2
optflags: e2k12c %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-12c
optflags: e2k16c %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-16c
optflags: e2k2c3 %optflags_core %optflags_warnings -Wno-error %optflags_debug %optflags_optimization -mcpu=elbrus-2c3
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
# The official RPM starting with 3.0.5 uses -mieee on Alpha by default.
# We don't as to not kill floating-point performance, but packages which
# care might want to add that flag themselves.
optflags: alpha %optflags_default -march=ev4
optflags: alphaev5 %optflags_default -march=ev5
optflags: alphaev56 %optflags_default -march=ev56
optflags: alphapca56 %optflags_default -march=pca56
optflags: alphaev6 %optflags_default -march=ev6
optflags: alphaev67 %optflags_default -march=ev67
optflags: sparc %optflags_default -m32 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=ultrasparc
optflags: sparcv8 %optflags_default -m32 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=ultrasparc
optflags: sparcv9 %optflags_default -m32 -mcpu=ultrasparc
optflags: sparc64 %optflags_default -m64 -mcpu=ultrasparc
optflags: m68k %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: ppc %optflags_default -fsigned-char
optflags: ppciseries %optflags_default -fsigned-char
optflags: ppcpseries %optflags_default -fsigned-char
optflags: ppc64 %optflags_default -fsigned-char
Add ppc64le support
2018-12-01 16:10:26 +03:00
optflags: ppc64le %optflags_default
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
optflags: parisc %optflags_default -mpa-risc-1-0
optflags: hppa1.0 %optflags_default -mpa-risc-1-0
optflags: hppa1.1 %optflags_default -mpa-risc-1-0
optflags: hppa1.2 %optflags_default -mpa-risc-1-0
optflags: hppa2.0 %optflags_default -mpa-risc-1-0
optflags: mips %optflags_default
optflags: mipsel %optflags_default
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
optflags: mipsn32 %optflags_default
optflags: mipsn32el %optflags_default
optflags: mips64 %optflags_default
optflags: mips64el %optflags_default
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
rpmrc.in: remove -fsigned-char from optflags for arm*
2007-09-10 11:50:18 +04:00
optflags: armv3l %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv3
optflags: armv4l %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv4
optflags: armv5l %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv5
Add support of armv5tel and fix armv5tejl Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
2008-08-23 17:43:12 +04:00
optflags: armv5tel %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv5te
optflags: armv5tejl %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv5te
rpmrc: add armv6l and armv7l, change default arm from armv4l to armv5te
2010-09-20 16:50:17 +04:00
optflags: armv6l %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv6
rpmrc.in, macros.in, installplatform: introduce armh arch
2012-08-05 18:34:32 +04:00
optflags: arm %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv5te
rpmrc.in: armv7: do not force FPU kind, rely on compiler defaults
2016-03-10 18:04:32 +03:00
optflags: armv7l %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv7-a -mthumb
optflags: armh %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv7-a -mthumb
macros.in: %%arm += armv8l; rpmrc.in: optflags for armv8l target added Targeting armv8l should trigger all the general ARM conditions in specfiles and set the custom optflags. Fixes: c18f1b7d ("installplatform, rpmrc.in: made armv8l compatible with armh")
2020-07-02 17:30:15 +03:00
optflags: armv8l %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer -march=armv8-a -mthumb
installplatform, rpmrc.in: introduce aarch64 architecture
2014-10-10 20:47:03 +04:00
optflags: aarch64 %optflags_default
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
optflags: riscv64 %optflags_default
Add support for loongarch64 Based on upstream commit 7a014dae736f9c7a7c75f63deaa4dbbb9ae0249c by Zhang Wenlong <zhangwenlong@loongson.cn>.
2022-11-09 17:37:49 +03:00
optflags: loongarch64 %optflags_default
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
optflags: atarist %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: atariste %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: ataritt %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: falcon %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: atariclone %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: milan %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: hades %optflags_default -fomit-frame-pointer
optflags: s390 %optflags_default
optflags: s390x %optflags_default
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
#############################################################
# Canonical arch names and numbers
Added pentium4 arch support (Raorn, #5259)
2004-10-31 22:08:39 +03:00
arch_canon: pentium4: pentium4 1
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_canon: pentium3: pentium3 1
arch_canon: pentium2: pentium2 1
Rename athlonxp platform to athlon_xp (#9991).
2006-09-17 01:50:43 +04:00
arch_canon: athlon_xp: athlon_xp 1
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_canon: athlon: athlon 1
arch_canon: i686: i686 1
sync with rpm4 branch
2002-03-26 01:32:55 +03:00
arch_canon: k6: k6 1
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_canon: i586: i586 1
arch_canon: i486: i486 1
arch_canon: i386: i386 1
Added x86_64 support.
2005-06-16 20:18:15 +04:00
arch_canon: amd64: amd64 1
arch_canon: ia32e: ia32e 1
add athlonxp
2006-03-20 17:50:02 +03:00
arch_canon: x86_64: x86_64 1
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_canon: alpha: alpha 2
arch_canon: alphaev5: alphaev5 2
arch_canon: alphaev56: alphaev56 2
arch_canon: alphapca56:alphapca56 2
arch_canon: alphaev6: alphaev6 2
arch_canon: alphaev67: alphaev67 2
arch_canon: sparc: sparc 3
arch_canon: sun4: sparc 3
arch_canon: sun4m: sparc 3
arch_canon: sun4c: sparc 3
arch_canon: sun4d: sparc 3
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_canon: sparcv8: sparcv8 3
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_canon: sparcv9: sparcv9 3
# This is really a place holder for MIPS.
arch_canon: mips: mips 4
arch_canon: ppc: ppc 5
arch_canon: ppciseries: ppciseries 5
arch_canon: ppcpseries: ppcpseries 5
arch_canon: m68k: m68k 6
arch_canon: IP: sgi 7
arch_canon: rs6000: rs6000 8
arch_canon: ia64: ia64 9
arch_canon: sparc64:sparc64 10
arch_canon: sun4u: sparc64 10
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_canon: mipsel: mipsel 11
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
arch_canon: mipsn32: mipsn32 11
arch_canon: mipsn32el: mipsn32el 11
arch_canon: mips64: mips64 11
arch_canon: mips64el: mips64el 11
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
Refresh ARM support Add arm and armb CANONARCH: common CANONARCH for general purpose distribution. It's armv4 without Thumb now. Update %optflags for ARM Add %arm macros: list of all ARM processors
2007-04-08 00:55:46 +04:00
arch_canon: armv4b: armeb 12
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
arch_canon: armv5b: armeb 12
arch_canon: armv3l: armv3l 12
arch_canon: armv4l: arm 12
arch_canon: armv5l: armv5l 12
arch_canon: armv5tel: armv5tel 12
arch_canon: armv5tejl: armv5tejl 12
arch_canon: armv6l: arm 12
arch_canon: armh: armh 12
arch_canon: armv7l: armv7l 12
arch_canon: armv8l: armv8l 12
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_canon: m68kmint: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: atarist: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: atariste: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: ataritt: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: falcon: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: atariclone: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: milan: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: hades: m68kmint 13
arch_canon: s390: s390 14
arch_canon: i370: i370 14
arch_canon: s390x: s390x 15
arch_canon: ppc64: ppc64 16
Add ppc64le support
2018-12-01 16:10:26 +03:00
arch_canon: ppc64le: ppc64le 16
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_canon: sh: sh 17
arch_canon: xtensa: xtensa 18
installplatform, rpmrc.in: introduce aarch64 architecture
2014-10-10 20:47:03 +04:00
arch_canon: aarch64: aarch64 19
Add e2k arch, subarches and all macros for them. Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@altlinux.org>
2018-03-26 20:39:57 +03:00
arch_canon: e2k: e2k 23
arch_canon: e2kv4: e2kv4 23
arch_canon: e2kv5: e2kv5 23
arch_canon: e2kv6: e2kv6 23
arch_canon: e2k4c: e2k4c 23
arch_canon: e2k8c: e2k8c 23
arch_canon: e2k1cp: e2k1cp 23
arch_canon: e2k8c2: e2k8c2 23
arch_canon: e2k12c: e2k16c 23
arch_canon: e2k2c3: e2k2c3 23
Add support for loongarch64 Based on upstream commit 7a014dae736f9c7a7c75f63deaa4dbbb9ae0249c by Zhang Wenlong <zhangwenlong@loongson.cn>.
2022-11-09 17:37:49 +03:00
# XXX: Upstream sets this to 23, but we have e2k:
arch_canon: loongarch64: loongarch64 24
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
#############################################################
# Canonical OS names and numbers
os_canon: Linux: Linux 1
os_canon: IRIX: Irix 2
# This is wrong
os_canon: SunOS5: solaris 3
os_canon: SunOS4: SunOS 4
os_canon: AmigaOS: AmigaOS 5
os_canon: AIX: AIX 5
os_canon: HP-UX: hpux10 6
os_canon: OSF1: osf1 7
os_canon: osf4.0: osf1 7
os_canon: osf3.2: osf1 7
os_canon: FreeBSD: FreeBSD 8
os_canon: SCO_SV: SCO_SV3.2v5.0.2 9
os_canon: IRIX64: Irix64 10
os_canon: NEXTSTEP: NextStep 11
os_canon: BSD_OS: bsdi 12
os_canon: machten: machten 13
os_canon: CYGWIN32_NT: cygwin32 14
os_canon: CYGWIN32_95: cygwin32 15
os_canon: UNIX_SV: MP_RAS: 16
os_canon: MiNT: FreeMiNT 17
os_canon: OS/390: OS/390 18
os_canon: VM/ESA: VM/ESA 19
os_canon: Linux/390: OS/390 20
os_canon: Linux/ESA: VM/ESA 20
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
os_canon: Darwin: darwin 21
os_canon: MacOSX: macosx 21
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
#############################################################
# For a given uname().machine, the default build arch
buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_i686: i386
buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_i586: i386
buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_i486: i386
buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_i386: i386
buildarchtranslate: ia64: ia64
Added x86_64 support.
2005-06-16 20:18:15 +04:00
buildarchtranslate: x86_64: x86_64
buildarchtranslate: amd64: x86_64
buildarchtranslate: ia32e: x86_64
Added pentium4 arch support (Raorn, #5259)
2004-10-31 22:08:39 +03:00
buildarchtranslate: pentium4: pentium4
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
buildarchtranslate: pentium3: pentium3
buildarchtranslate: pentium2: pentium2
Rename athlonxp platform to athlon_xp (#9991).
2006-09-17 01:50:43 +04:00
buildarchtranslate: athlon_xp: athlon_xp
sync with rpm4 branch
2002-03-26 01:32:55 +03:00
buildarchtranslate: athlon: athlon
buildarchtranslate: i686: i686
buildarchtranslate: k6: k6
buildarchtranslate: i586: i586
buildarchtranslate: i486: i486
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarchtranslate: i386: i386
buildarchtranslate: alphaev5: alpha
buildarchtranslate: alphaev56: alpha
buildarchtranslate: alphapca56: alpha
buildarchtranslate: alphaev6: alpha
buildarchtranslate: alphaev67: alpha
buildarchtranslate: sun4c: sparc
buildarchtranslate: sun4d: sparc
buildarchtranslate: sun4m: sparc
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
buildarchtranslate: sparcv8: sparc
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarchtranslate: sparcv9: sparc
buildarchtranslate: sun4u: sparc64
buildarchtranslate: osfmach3_ppc: ppc
buildarchtranslate: powerpc: ppc
buildarchtranslate: powerppc: ppc
buildarchtranslate: ppciseries: ppc
buildarchtranslate: ppcpseries: ppc
buildarchtranslate: atarist: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: atariste: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: ataritt: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: falcon: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: atariclone: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: milan: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: hades: m68kmint
buildarchtranslate: s390: s390
buildarchtranslate: s390x: s390x
#############################################################
# Architecture compatibility
arch_compat: alphaev67: alphaev6
arch_compat: alphaev6: alphapca56
arch_compat: alphapca56: alphaev56
arch_compat: alphaev56: alphaev5
arch_compat: alphaev5: alpha
arch_compat: alpha: axp noarch
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_compat: pentium4: pentium3
Rename athlonxp platform to athlon_xp (#9991).
2006-09-17 01:50:43 +04:00
arch_compat: athlon_xp: athlon pentium3
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_compat: pentium3: pentium2
add athlonxp
2006-03-20 17:50:02 +03:00
arch_compat: athlon: k6 pentium2
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_compat: pentium2: i686
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: i686: i586
sync with rpm4 branch
2002-03-26 01:32:55 +03:00
arch_compat: k6: i586
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: i586: i486
arch_compat: i486: i386
arch_compat: i386: noarch
Add e2k arch, subarches and all macros for them. Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@altlinux.org>
2018-03-26 20:39:57 +03:00
arch_compat: e2k12c: e2kv6
arch_compat: e2k16c: e2kv6
arch_compat: e2k2c3: e2kv6
arch_compat: e2kv6: e2kv5
arch_compat: e2k8c2: e2kv5
arch_compat: e2kv5: e2kv4
arch_compat: e2k8c: e2kv4
arch_compat: e2k1cp: e2kv4
arch_compat: e2kv4: e2k
arch_compat: e2k4c: e2k
arch_compat: e2k: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: osfmach3_i686: i686 osfmach3_i586
arch_compat: osfmach3_i586: i586 osfmach3_i486
arch_compat: osfmach3_i486: i486 osfmach3_i386
arch_compat: osfmach3_i386: i486
arch_compat: osfmach3_ppc: ppc
arch_compat: powerpc: ppc
arch_compat: powerppc: ppc
arch_compat: ppciseries: ppc
arch_compat: ppcpseries: ppc
arch_compat: ppc64: ppc
arch_compat: ppc: rs6000
arch_compat: rs6000: noarch
Add ppc64le support
2018-12-01 16:10:26 +03:00
arch_compat: ppc64le: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: sun4c: sparc
arch_compat: sun4d: sparc
arch_compat: sun4m: sparc
arch_compat: sun4u: sparc64
arch_compat: sparc64: sparcv9
arch_compat: sparcv9: sparc
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
arch_compat: sparcv8: sparc
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: sparc: noarch
arch_compat: mips: noarch
arch_compat: mipsel: noarch
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
arch_compat: mipsn32: noarch
arch_compat: mipsn32el: noarch
arch_compat: mips64: noarch
arch_compat: mips64el: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: hppa2.0: hppa1.2
arch_compat: hppa1.2: hppa1.1
arch_compat: hppa1.1: hppa1.0
arch_compat: hppa1.0: parisc
arch_compat: parisc: noarch
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
arch_compat: armv5b: armv4b
arch_compat: armv4b: armeb
arch_compat: armeb: noarch
rpmrc.in, macros.in, installplatform: introduce armh arch
2012-08-05 18:34:32 +04:00
arch_compat: armv6l: armv5tejl
Add support of armv5tel and fix armv5tejl Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
2008-08-23 17:43:12 +04:00
arch_compat: armv5tejl: armv5tel
arch_compat: armv5tel: armv5l
rpmrc: add armv6l and armv7l, change default arm from armv4l to armv5te
2010-09-20 16:50:17 +04:00
arch_compat: armv5l: arm
Refresh ARM support Add arm and armb CANONARCH: common CANONARCH for general purpose distribution. It's armv4 without Thumb now. Update %optflags for ARM Add %arm macros: list of all ARM processors
2007-04-08 00:55:46 +04:00
arch_compat: arm: armv3l
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: armv3l: noarch
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
arch_compat: armv8l: armv7l
arch_compat: armv7l: armh
arch_compat: armh: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
arch_compat: atarist: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: atariste: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: ataritt: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: falcon: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: atariclone: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: milan: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: hades: m68kmint noarch
arch_compat: i370: noarch
arch_compat: s390: noarch
arch_compat: s390x: s390 noarch
Added x86_64 support.
2005-06-16 20:18:15 +04:00
arch_compat: ia64: noarch
add athlonxp
2006-03-20 17:50:02 +03:00
arch_compat: amd64: x86_64
arch_compat: ia32e: x86_64
Rename athlonxp platform to athlon_xp (#9991).
2006-09-17 01:50:43 +04:00
arch_compat: x86_64: athlon_xp pentium4
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
arch_compat: aarch64: noarch
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
arch_compat: riscv64: noarch
Add support for loongarch64 Based on upstream commit 7a014dae736f9c7a7c75f63deaa4dbbb9ae0249c by Zhang Wenlong <zhangwenlong@loongson.cn>.
2022-11-09 17:37:49 +03:00
arch_compat: loongarch64: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
os_compat: IRIX64: IRIX
os_compat: solaris2.7: solaris2.3 solaris2.4 solaris2.5 solaris2.6
os_compat: solaris2.6: solaris2.3 solaris2.4 solaris2.5
os_compat: solaris2.5: solaris2.3 solaris2.4
os_compat: solaris2.4: solaris2.3
os_compat: hpux11.00: hpux10.30
os_compat: hpux10.30: hpux10.20
os_compat: hpux10.20: hpux10.10
os_compat: hpux10.10: hpux10.01
os_compat: hpux10.01: hpux10.00
os_compat: hpux10.00: hpux9.07
os_compat: hpux9.07: hpux9.05
os_compat: hpux9.05: hpux9.04
os_compat: osf4.0: osf3.2 osf1
os_compat: ncr-sysv4.3: ncr-sysv4.2
os_compat: FreeMiNT: mint MiNT TOS
os_compat: MiNT: FreeMiNT mint TOS
os_compat: mint: FreeMiNT MiNT TOS
os_compat: TOS: FreeMiNT MiNT mint
os_compat: BSD_OS: bsdi
os_compat: bsdi4.0: bsdi
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
os_compat: Darwin: MacOSX
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: ia64: noarch
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
buildarch_compat: aarch64: noarch
Added x86_64 support.
2005-06-16 20:18:15 +04:00
buildarch_compat: x86_64: noarch
buildarch_compat: amd64: x86_64
buildarch_compat: ia32e: x86_64
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
buildarch_compat: pentium4: pentium3
Rename athlonxp platform to athlon_xp (#9991).
2006-09-17 01:50:43 +04:00
buildarch_compat: athlon_xp: athlon pentium3
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
buildarch_compat: pentium3: pentium2
add athlonxp
2006-03-20 17:50:02 +03:00
buildarch_compat: athlon: k6 pentium2
added pentium2, pentium3, sparcv8, darwin, macosx; replaced -mcpu=i686 with -mtune=pentium4; added -mtune=athlon-4 for k6-compatibles
2006-03-20 04:18:49 +03:00
buildarch_compat: pentium2: i686
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: i686: i586
sync with rpm4 branch
2002-03-26 01:32:55 +03:00
buildarch_compat: k6: i586
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: i586: i486
buildarch_compat: i486: i386
buildarch_compat: i386: noarch
Add e2k arch, subarches and all macros for them. Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@altlinux.org>
2018-03-26 20:39:57 +03:00
buildarch_compat: e2k12c: e2kv6
buildarch_compat: e2k16c: e2kv6
buildarch_compat: e2k2c3: e2kv6
buildarch_compat: e2kv6: e2kv5
buildarch_compat: e2k8c2: e2kv5
buildarch_compat: e2kv5: e2kv4
buildarch_compat: e2k8c: e2kv4
buildarch_compat: e2k1cp: e2kv4
buildarch_compat: e2kv4: e2k
buildarch_compat: e2k4c: e2k
buildarch_compat: e2k: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: sun4c: noarch
buildarch_compat: sun4d: noarch
buildarch_compat: sun4m: noarch
buildarch_compat: sun4u: noarch
buildarch_compat: sparc64: noarch
buildarch_compat: sparcv9: sparc
buildarch_compat: sparc: noarch
buildarch_compat: alphaev67: alphaev6
buildarch_compat: alphaev6: alphapca56
buildarch_compat: alphapca56: alphaev56
buildarch_compat: alphaev56: alphaev5
buildarch_compat: alphaev5: alpha
buildarch_compat: alpha: noarch
buildarch_compat: m68k: noarch
buildarch_compat: ppciseries: noarch
buildarch_compat: ppcpseries: noarch
buildarch_compat: ppc: noarch
buildarch_compat: ppc64: noarch
Add ppc64le support
2018-12-01 16:10:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: ppc64le: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: mips: noarch
buildarch_compat: mipsel: noarch
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
buildarch_compat: mipsn32: noarch
buildarch_compat: mipsn32el: noarch
buildarch_compat: mips64: noarch
buildarch_compat: mips64el: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
buildarch_compat: armv5b: armv4b
buildarch_compat: armv4b: arrmeb
buildarch_compat: armeb: noarch
rpmrc.in, macros.in, installplatform: introduce armh arch
2012-08-05 18:34:32 +04:00
buildarch_compat: armv6l: armv5tejl
Add support of armv5tel and fix armv5tejl Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
2008-08-23 17:43:12 +04:00
buildarch_compat: armv5tejl: armv5tel
buildarch_compat: armv5tel: armv5l
Refresh ARM support Add arm and armb CANONARCH: common CANONARCH for general purpose distribution. It's armv4 without Thumb now. Update %optflags for ARM Add %arm macros: list of all ARM processors
2007-04-08 00:55:46 +04:00
buildarch_compat: armv5l: armv4l
buildarch_compat: armv4l: arm
buildarch_compat: arm: armv3l
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: armv3l: noarch
rpmrc.in: inessential tweaks to follow upstream rpmrc.in more closely * * * Add arch_canon statements for "armh", "armv7l", "armv8l". Re-order them to be more similar to the current upstream rpmrc.in (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22). Note, however, that this change doesn't seem to be essential for anything, since "the arch in the lead [the arch number] is not used for any purpose for most of this century".[1] [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/39426935/94687 "answer by Jeff Johnson" * * * Re-order ARM arch_compat statements to get an order similar to the upstream (say, rpm-4.15 or rpm-4.13.0.1-alt22) to be able to compare them more easily; compare to our rpmrc.in: * the upstream first lists the big-endian archs (noarch -> armv4b); * then the little-endian ones without hardfloat (noarch -> armv3l -> armv4l -> -> armv4tl -> armv5tl -> armv5tel -> armv5tejl -> armv6l -> armv7l -> armv8l); * the the little-endian ones with hardfloat (noarch -> armv6hl -> armv7hl -> armv7hnl -> armv8hl); * and separately the 64-bit one (noarch -> aarch64). In our version of rpm-build we don't have any code for the detection of the 'h' (hardfloat) or 'n' (neon) CPU features, but we actually insert our "armh" arch into this chain (with 'h' hardfloat) between what ought to be "armv6hl" and "armv7hl", and drop "armv6hl" from our chain; in our compatibility chain, 'h' is silently supposed for "armv7l" and "armv8l". However, note a bad thing about this discrepancy: when our rpm-build builds a package on armv8l targeting this arch, it's arch is armv8l. However, when installing such a package on a normal ARMv8-A machine, the 'h' feature must have been detected by "rpm -i", so our just built package must not match the system arch and the installation must be denied. However, in practice, I don't see such bad behavior in our Girar builder when rpminstall-test-archcompat-checkinstall is invoked... (I don't know why. Perhaps, the 'h' detection code doesn't work as expected in rpm.) * * * Re-order similarly buildarch_compat statements.
2020-07-02 20:56:19 +03:00
buildarch_compat: armv8l: armv7l
buildarch_compat: armv7l: armh
buildarch_compat: armh: noarch
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
buildarch_compat: hppa2.0: hppa1.2
buildarch_compat: hppa1.2: hppa1.1
buildarch_compat: hppa1.1: hppa1.0
buildarch_compat: hppa1.0: parisc
buildarch_compat: parisc: noarch
buildarch_compat: atarist: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: atariste: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: ataritt: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: falcon: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: atariclone: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: milan: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: hades: m68kmint noarch
buildarch_compat: ia64: noarch
buildarch_compat: s390: noarch
buildarch_compat: s390x: noarch
Introduce mips{,n32,64}{,el}, riscv64, and s390x architectures
2017-11-17 17:43:56 +03:00
buildarch_compat: riscv64: noarch
Add support for loongarch64 Based on upstream commit 7a014dae736f9c7a7c75f63deaa4dbbb9ae0249c by Zhang Wenlong <zhangwenlong@loongson.cn>.
2022-11-09 17:37:49 +03:00
buildarch_compat: loongarch64: noarch
Rename macros and rpmrc to buildmacros and rpmbuildrc This change is needed only for rpm-4.13+rpmbuild-4.0.4 bootstrap. Files in rpm-4.13 can and should be compatible with rpmbuild-4.0.4 and vice versa.
2016-06-21 18:37:08 +03:00
macrofiles: @RPMCONFIGDIR@/buildmacros:@RPMCONFIGDIR@/%{_target}/macros:@RPMCONFIGDIR@/macros.d/*:@SYSCONFIGDIR@/macros.specspo:@SYSCONFIGDIR@/macros.cdb:@SYSCONFIGDIR@/macros:@SYSCONFIGDIR@/%{_target}/macros:@SYSCONFIGDIR@/macros.d/*:~/.rpmmacros
Initial revision
2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
# \endverbatim
#*/
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink