rpm-build/build/TODO

41 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2002-03-25 23:16:26 +03:00
>I just found an odd little bug in rpm 2.5, when there is something like
>
>%doc readme
>
>in the %files list, then if readme doesn't exit, rpm will just put an empty
>doc directory in the package.
option to %setup to *not* do chown/chgrp/chmod
> Most of my spec files have empty Distribution: and Vendor: tag because I
> really don't care. Now, empty tags are frowned upon. So, I try to comment
> out the lines and get a funny error message:
>
> Distribution field must be present in package: solaris2.6
> Vendor field must be present in package: solaris2.6
>
> This happens to be my value of 'Build Os' which gets into the error message!
posix %attr
some /foo/*/*.foo entries don't get matches
detect multiple summary/description entries
verify langs
remove prefix stuff from files.c (not used anymore)
i18n strings
=====================================================================
triggers
custom find-requires, find-provides
messages (normal, verbose, debug)
deprecate require_distribution, require_icon, require_vendor
deprecate RPMVAR_ROOT, and the RPMVAR_REQUIRE* stuff above