41 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
41 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
|
>I just found an odd little bug in rpm 2.5, when there is something like
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>%doc readme
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
>in the %files list, then if readme doesn't exit, rpm will just put an empty
|
||
|
>doc directory in the package.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
option to %setup to *not* do chown/chgrp/chmod
|
||
|
|
||
|
> Most of my spec files have empty Distribution: and Vendor: tag because I
|
||
|
> really don't care. Now, empty tags are frowned upon. So, I try to comment
|
||
|
> out the lines and get a funny error message:
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> Distribution field must be present in package: solaris2.6
|
||
|
> Vendor field must be present in package: solaris2.6
|
||
|
>
|
||
|
> This happens to be my value of 'Build Os' which gets into the error message!
|
||
|
|
||
|
posix %attr
|
||
|
|
||
|
some /foo/*/*.foo entries don't get matches
|
||
|
|
||
|
detect multiple summary/description entries
|
||
|
|
||
|
verify langs
|
||
|
|
||
|
remove prefix stuff from files.c (not used anymore)
|
||
|
|
||
|
i18n strings
|
||
|
|
||
|
=====================================================================
|
||
|
triggers
|
||
|
|
||
|
custom find-requires, find-provides
|
||
|
|
||
|
messages (normal, verbose, debug)
|
||
|
|
||
|
deprecate require_distribution, require_icon, require_vendor
|
||
|
deprecate RPMVAR_ROOT, and the RPMVAR_REQUIRE* stuff above
|