IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
To remove `pending_querybuf`, the key point is reusing `querybuf`, it means master client's `querybuf` is not only used to parse command, but also proxy to sub-replicas.
1. add a new variable `repl_applied` for master client to record how many data applied (propagated via `replicationFeedStreamFromMasterStream()`) but not trimmed in `querybuf`.
2. don't sdsrange `querybuf` in `commandProcessed()`, we trim it to `repl_applied` after the whole replication pipeline processed to avoid fragmented `sdsrange`. And here are some scenarios we cannot trim to `qb_pos`:
* we don't receive complete command from master
* master client blocked because of client pause
* IO threads operate read, master client flagged with CLIENT_PENDING_COMMAND
In these scenarios, `qb_pos` points to the part of the current command or the beginning of next command, and the current command is not applied yet, so the `repl_applied` is not equal to `qb_pos`.
Some other notes:
* Do not do big arg optimization on master client, since we can only sdsrange `querybuf` after data sent to replicas.
* Set `qb_pos` and `repl_applied` to 0 when `freeClient` in `replicationCacheMaster`.
* Rewrite `processPendingCommandsAndResetClient` to `processPendingCommandAndInputBuffer`, let `processInputBuffer` to be called successively after `processCommandAndResetClient`.
78bef6e1fe