Thomas Lamprecht e50448e4ec tape: rework setting MAM Host type attributes
The product name is Proxmox Backup Server, not just Backup Server,
that makes no sense on its own and it really cannot be expected by
tools extracting any Medium Auxiliary Memory (MAM) info to render it
as `${app_vendor} ${app_name}`.

Drop the comment about ignoring errors, that's pretty clear with
the only-log-error construct.

Instead, add some comments about what the hex numbers refers too and
what their respective length (limit) is. The names where taken from
Table 315 "MAM Host type attributes" in the "IBM LTO SCSI Reference"
for LTO 9.

Slightly off-topic: The tape code really is a mess with sprinkling
those hex numbers hard coded all over the place, often with some
unchecked coupling in other places (like here, the list of set MAM
attrs and the one that get cleared can easily get out of sync..), but
that's for another time to clean-up (I need to cut a release).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
2024-05-22 19:15:16 +02:00
2024-05-22 16:05:53 +02:00
2022-12-12 09:08:56 +01:00
2024-02-02 15:07:38 +01:00
2021-09-03 10:29:48 +02:00
2024-05-22 16:05:49 +02:00
2021-02-10 11:05:02 +01:00
2022-10-13 15:01:11 +02:00

Build & Release Notes
*********************

``rustup`` Toolchain
====================

We normally want to build with the ``rustc`` Debian package. To do that
you can set the following ``rustup`` configuration:

    # rustup toolchain link system /usr
    # rustup default system


Versioning of proxmox helper crates
===================================

To use current git master code of the proxmox* helper crates, add::

   git = "git://git.proxmox.com/git/proxmox"

or::

   path = "../proxmox/proxmox"

to the proxmox dependency, and update the version to reflect the current,
pre-release version number (e.g., "0.1.1-dev.1" instead of "0.1.0").


Local cargo config
==================

This repository ships with a ``.cargo/config`` that replaces the crates.io
registry with packaged crates located in ``/usr/share/cargo/registry``.

A similar config is also applied building with dh_cargo. Cargo.lock needs to be
deleted when switching between packaged crates and crates.io, since the
checksums are not compatible.

To reference new dependencies (or updated versions) that are not yet packaged,
the dependency needs to point directly to a path or git source (e.g., see
example for proxmox crate above).


Build
=====
on Debian 12 Bookworm

Setup:
  1. # echo 'deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian/devel/ bookworm main' | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/proxmox-devel.list
  2. # sudo wget https://enterprise.proxmox.com/debian/proxmox-release-bookworm.gpg -O /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/proxmox-release-bookworm.gpg
  3. # sudo apt update
  4. # sudo apt install devscripts debcargo clang
  5. # git clone git://git.proxmox.com/git/proxmox-backup.git
  6. # cd proxmox-backup; sudo mk-build-deps -ir

Note: 2. may be skipped if you already added the PVE or PBS package repository

You are now able to build using the Makefile or cargo itself, e.g.::

  # make deb
  # # or for a non-package build
  # cargo build --all --release

Design Notes
************

Here are some random thought about the software design (unless I find a better place).


Large chunk sizes
=================

It is important to notice that large chunk sizes are crucial for performance.
We have a multi-user system, where different people can do different operations
on a datastore at the same time, and most operation involves reading a series
of chunks.

So what is the maximal theoretical speed we can get when reading a series of
chunks? Reading a chunk sequence need the following steps:

- seek to the first chunk's start location
- read the chunk data
- seek to the next chunk's start location
- read the chunk data
- ...

Lets use the following disk performance metrics:

:AST: Average Seek Time (second)
:MRS: Maximum sequential Read Speed (bytes/second)
:ACS: Average Chunk Size (bytes)

The maximum performance you can get is::

  MAX(ACS) = ACS /(AST + ACS/MRS)

Please note that chunk data is likely to be sequential arranged on disk, but
this it is sort of a best case assumption.

For a typical rotational disk, we assume the following values::

  AST: 10ms
  MRS: 170MB/s

  MAX(4MB)  = 115.37 MB/s
  MAX(1MB)  =  61.85 MB/s;
  MAX(64KB) =   6.02 MB/s;
  MAX(4KB)  =   0.39 MB/s;
  MAX(1KB)  =   0.10 MB/s;

Modern SSD are much faster, lets assume the following::

  max IOPS: 20000 => AST = 0.00005
  MRS: 500Mb/s

  MAX(4MB)  = 474 MB/s
  MAX(1MB)  = 465 MB/s;
  MAX(64KB) = 354 MB/s;
  MAX(4KB)  =  67 MB/s;
  MAX(1KB)  =  18 MB/s;


Also, the average chunk directly relates to the number of chunks produced by
a backup::

  CHUNK_COUNT = BACKUP_SIZE / ACS

Here are some staticics from my developer worstation::

  Disk Usage:       65 GB
  Directories:   58971
  Files:        726314
  Files < 64KB: 617541

As you see, there are really many small files. If we would do file
level deduplication, i.e. generate one chunk per file, we end up with
more than 700000 chunks.

Instead, our current algorithm only produce large chunks with an
average chunks size of 4MB. With above data, this produce about 15000
chunks (factor 50 less chunks).
Description
No description provided
Readme 120 MiB
Languages
Rust 86.9%
JavaScript 12.3%
Makefile 0.3%
Handlebars 0.2%
CSS 0.2%