2019-06-12 20:52:38 +03:00
=========================================
Tagged virtual addresses in AArch64 Linux
=========================================
2013-06-12 19:28:04 +04:00
Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2019-06-12 20:52:38 +03:00
2013-06-12 19:28:04 +04:00
Date : 12 June 2013
This document briefly describes the provision of tagged virtual
addresses in the AArch64 translation system and their potential uses
in AArch64 Linux.
The kernel configures the translation tables so that translations made
via TTBR0 (i.e. userspace mappings) have the top byte (bits 63:56) of
the virtual address ignored by the translation hardware. This frees up
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
this byte for application use.
2013-06-12 19:28:04 +04:00
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
Passing tagged addresses to the kernel
--------------------------------------
2013-06-12 19:28:04 +04:00
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
All interpretation of userspace memory addresses by the kernel assumes
2019-08-23 19:37:17 +03:00
an address tag of 0x00, unless the application enables the AArch64
Tagged Address ABI explicitly
(Documentation/arm64/tagged-address-abi.rst).
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
This includes, but is not limited to, addresses found in:
- pointer arguments to system calls, including pointers in structures
passed to system calls,
- the stack pointer (sp), e.g. when interpreting it to deliver a
signal,
- the frame pointer (x29) and frame records, e.g. when interpreting
them to generate a backtrace or call graph.
2019-08-23 19:37:17 +03:00
Using non-zero address tags in any of these locations when the
userspace application did not enable the AArch64 Tagged Address ABI may
result in an error code being returned, a (fatal) signal being raised,
or other modes of failure.
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
2019-08-23 19:37:17 +03:00
For these reasons, when the AArch64 Tagged Address ABI is disabled,
passing non-zero address tags to the kernel via system calls is
forbidden, and using a non-zero address tag for sp is strongly
discouraged.
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
Programs maintaining a frame pointer and frame records that use non-zero
address tags may suffer impaired or inaccurate debug and profiling
visibility.
Preserving tags
---------------
2020-11-20 23:33:46 +03:00
When delivering signals, non-zero tags are not preserved in
siginfo.si_addr unless the flag SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS was set in
sigaction.sa_flags when the signal handler was installed. This means
that signal handlers in applications making use of tags cannot rely
on the tag information for user virtual addresses being maintained
in these fields unless the flag was set.
Due to architecture limitations, bits 63:60 of the fault address
are not preserved in response to synchronous tag check faults
(SEGV_MTESERR) even if SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS was set. Applications should
treat the values of these bits as undefined in order to accommodate
future architecture revisions which may preserve the bits.
For signals raised in response to watchpoint debug exceptions, the
tag information will be preserved regardless of the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS
flag setting.
Non-zero tags are never preserved in sigcontext.fault_address
regardless of the SA_EXPOSE_TAGBITS flag setting.
2013-06-12 19:28:04 +04:00
The architecture prevents the use of a tagged PC, so the upper byte will
be set to a sign-extension of bit 55 on exception return.
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
2019-08-23 19:37:17 +03:00
This behaviour is maintained when the AArch64 Tagged Address ABI is
enabled.
arm64: documentation: document tagged pointer stack constraints
Some kernel features don't currently work if a task puts a non-zero
address tag in its stack pointer, frame pointer, or frame record entries
(FP, LR).
For example, with a tagged stack pointer, the kernel can't deliver
signals to the process, and the task is killed instead. As another
example, with a tagged frame pointer or frame records, perf fails to
generate call graphs or resolve symbols.
For now, just document these limitations, instead of finding and fixing
everything that doesn't work, as it's not known if anyone needs to use
tags in these places anyway.
In addition, as requested by Dave Martin, generalize the limitations
into a general kernel address tag policy, and refactor
tagged-pointers.txt to include it.
Fixes: d50240a5f6ce ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12.x-
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2017-05-03 18:37:48 +03:00
Other considerations
--------------------
Special care should be taken when using tagged pointers, since it is
likely that C compilers will not hazard two virtual addresses differing
only in the upper byte.
