workqueue: allow rescuer thread to do more work.
When there is serious memory pressure, all workers in a pool could be blocked, and a new thread cannot be created because it requires memory allocation. In this situation a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue will wake up the rescuer thread to do some work. The rescuer will only handle requests that are already on ->worklist. If max_requests is 1, that means it will handle a single request. The rescuer will be woken again in 100ms to handle another max_requests requests. I've seen a machine (running a 3.0 based "enterprise" kernel) with thousands of requests queued for xfslogd, which has a max_requests of 1, and is needed for retiring all 'xfs' write requests. When one of the worker pools gets into this state, it progresses extremely slowly and possibly never recovers (only waited an hour or two). With this patch we leave a pool_workqueue on mayday list until it is clearly no longer in need of assistance. This allows all requests to be handled in a timely fashion. We keep each pool_workqueue on the mayday list until need_to_create_worker() is false, and no work for this workqueue is found in the pool. I have tested this in combination with a (hackish) patch which forces all work items to be handled by the rescuer thread. In that context it significantly improves performance. A similar patch for a 3.0 kernel significantly improved performance on a heavy work load. Thanks to Jan Kara for some design ideas, and to Dongsu Park for some comments and testing. tj: Inverted the lock order between wq_mayday_lock and pool->lock with a preceding patch and simplified this patch. Added comment and updated changelog accordingly. Dongsu spotted missing get_pwq() in the simplified code. Cc: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b2d829096b
commit
008847f66c
@ -2253,7 +2253,25 @@ repeat:
|
||||
if (get_work_pwq(work) == pwq)
|
||||
move_linked_works(work, scheduled, &n);
|
||||
|
||||
process_scheduled_works(rescuer);
|
||||
if (!list_empty(scheduled)) {
|
||||
process_scheduled_works(rescuer);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The above execution of rescued work items could
|
||||
* have created more to rescue through
|
||||
* pwq_activate_first_delayed() or chained
|
||||
* queueing. Let's put @pwq back on mayday list so
|
||||
* that such back-to-back work items, which may be
|
||||
* being used to relieve memory pressure, don't
|
||||
* incur MAYDAY_INTERVAL delay inbetween.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (need_to_create_worker(pool)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&wq_mayday_lock);
|
||||
get_pwq(pwq);
|
||||
list_move_tail(&pwq->mayday_node, &wq->maydays);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&wq_mayday_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Put the reference grabbed by send_mayday(). @pool won't
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user