iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

can: c_can: rename IF_RX -> IF_NAPI

Browse Source 
The C_CAN/D_CAN cores implement 2 interfaces to manage the message
objects. To avoid concurrency and the need for locking one interface
is used in the TX path (IF_TX). While the other one, named IF_RX is
used from NAPI context only. As this interface is not only used to
manage RX, but also TX message objects, this patch renames IF_RX to
IF_NAPI.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210809080608.171545-1-mkl@pengutronix.de
Cc: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Marc Kleine-Budde 2021-08-09 09:26:35 +02:00
parent 236de85f6a
commit 05cb2ba4b2
1 changed files with 14 additions and 12 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
View File

@ -160,8 +160,8 @@
#define IF_MCONT_TX (IF_MCONT_TXIE | IF_MCONT_EOB)
/* Use IF1 for RX and IF2 for TX */
#define IF_RX 0
/* Use IF1 in NAPI path and IF2 in TX path */
#define IF_NAPI 0
#define IF_TX 1
/* minimum timeout for checking BUSY status */
@ -529,13 +529,13 @@ static void c_can_configure_msg_objects(struct net_device *dev)
/* first invalidate all message objects */
for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i <= priv->msg_obj_num; i++)
c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IF_RX, i);
c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IF_NAPI, i);
/* setup receive message objects */
for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i < priv->msg_obj_rx_last; i++)
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, i, 0, 0, IF_MCONT_RCV);
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_NAPI, i, 0, 0, IF_MCONT_RCV);
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, priv->msg_obj_rx_last, 0, 0,
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_NAPI, priv->msg_obj_rx_last, 0, 0,
IF_MCONT_RCV_EOB);
}
@ -710,11 +710,11 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
pend &= ~BIT(idx);
obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;
/* We use IF_RX interface instead of IF_TX because we
/* We use IF_NAPI interface instead of IF_TX because we
* are called from c_can_poll(), which runs inside
* NAPI. We are not transmitting.
*/
c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_RX, obj);
c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_NAPI, obj);
can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
pkts++;
@ -766,14 +766,14 @@ static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend, u32 rx_mask)
static inline void c_can_rx_object_get(struct net_device *dev,
struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
{
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_NAPI, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
}
static inline void c_can_rx_finalize(struct net_device *dev,
struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
{
if (priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN)
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT);
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_NAPI, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT);
}
static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
@ -785,10 +785,12 @@ static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
pend &= ~BIT(obj - 1);
c_can_rx_object_get(dev, priv, obj);
ctrl = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IF_RX));
ctrl = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IF_NAPI));
if (ctrl & IF_MCONT_MSGLST) {
int n = c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX, obj, ctrl);
int n;
n = c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IF_NAPI, obj, ctrl);
pkts += n;
quota -= n;
@ -803,7 +805,7 @@ static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
continue;
/* read the data from the message object */
c_can_read_msg_object(dev, IF_RX, ctrl);
c_can_read_msg_object(dev, IF_NAPI, ctrl);
c_can_rx_finalize(dev, priv, obj);