perf tools: Add +field argument support for --sort option
Adding support to add field(s) to default sort order via using the '+' prefix, like for report: $ perf report Samples: 2K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 882172583 Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol 7.39% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 1.97% firefox libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock 1.39% firefox [snd_hda_intel] [k] azx_get_position 1.11% firefox libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_unlock $ perf report -s +cpu Samples: 2K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 882172583 Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol CPU 2.89% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 000 2.61% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 002 1.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 001 0.82% firefox libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock 002 Works in general for commands using --sort option. v2 with changes suggested: - Use dynamic memory instead static buffer - Fix error message typo Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140823125948.GA1193@krava.brq.redhat.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c88f209613
commit
1a1c0ffb2a
@ -1446,12 +1446,47 @@ static const char *get_default_sort_order(void)
|
||||
return default_sort_orders[sort__mode];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int setup_sort_order(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
char *new_sort_order;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Append '+'-prefixed sort order to the default sort
|
||||
* order string.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!sort_order || is_strict_order(sort_order))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sort_order[1] == '\0') {
|
||||
error("Invalid --sort key: `+'");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We allocate new sort_order string, but we never free it,
|
||||
* because it's checked over the rest of the code.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (asprintf(&new_sort_order, "%s,%s",
|
||||
get_default_sort_order(), sort_order + 1) < 0) {
|
||||
error("Not enough memory to set up --sort");
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sort_order = new_sort_order;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __setup_sorting(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
char *tmp, *tok, *str;
|
||||
const char *sort_keys = sort_order;
|
||||
const char *sort_keys;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = setup_sort_order();
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
sort_keys = sort_order;
|
||||
if (sort_keys == NULL) {
|
||||
if (is_strict_order(field_order)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user