rcu: Prevent soft-lockup complaints about no-CBs CPUs
The wait_event() at the head of the rcu_nocb_kthread() can result in soft-lockup complaints if the CPU in question does not register RCU callbacks for an extended period. This commit therefore changes the wait_event() to a wait_event_interruptible(). Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1c3ed669a
commit
353af9c9a8
@ -2366,10 +2366,11 @@ static int rcu_nocb_kthread(void *arg)
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
/* If not polling, wait for next batch of callbacks. */
|
||||
if (!rcu_nocb_poll)
|
||||
wait_event(rdp->nocb_wq, rdp->nocb_head);
|
||||
wait_event_interruptible(rdp->nocb_wq, rdp->nocb_head);
|
||||
list = ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_head);
|
||||
if (!list) {
|
||||
schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
|
||||
flush_signals(current);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user