btrfs: introduce BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT for split blocks
If we are splitting a leaf/node, we could do something like the
following
lock(leaf) BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL
lock(left) BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT + BTRFS_NESTING_COW
push from leaf -> left
reset path to point to left
split left
allocate new block, lock block BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT
at the new block point we need to have a different nesting level,
because we have already used either BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT or
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT when pushing items from the original leaf into the
adjacent leaves.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David Sterba
parent
bf59a5a216
commit
4dff97e690
@@ -3537,7 +3537,7 @@ static noinline int split_node(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
||||
btrfs_node_key(c, &disk_key, mid);
|
||||
|
||||
split = alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush(trans, root, 0, &disk_key, level,
|
||||
c->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL);
|
||||
c->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(split))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(split);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4324,7 +4324,7 @@ again:
|
||||
btrfs_item_key(l, &disk_key, mid);
|
||||
|
||||
right = alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush(trans, root, 0, &disk_key, 0,
|
||||
l->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_NORMAL);
|
||||
l->start, 0, BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(right))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(right);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ enum btrfs_lock_nesting {
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_LEFT_COW,
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_RIGHT_COW,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When splitting we may push nodes to the left or right, but still use
|
||||
* the subsequent nodes in our path, keeping our locks on those adjacent
|
||||
* blocks. Thus when we go to allocate a new split block we've already
|
||||
* used up all of our available subclasses, so this subclass exists to
|
||||
* handle this case where we need to allocate a new split block.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BTRFS_NESTING_SPLIT,
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are limited to MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBLCLASSES number of subclasses, so
|
||||
* add this in here and add a static_assert to keep us from going over
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user