OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case
There are two genpd (as required-opp) cases that we need to handle, devices with a single genpd and ones with multiple genpds. The multiple genpds case is clear, where the OPP core calls dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() for them and uses the virtual devices returned by this helper to call dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state() later to change the performance state. The single genpd case however requires special handling as we need to use the same `dev` structure (instead of a virtual one provided by genpd core) for setting the performance state via dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state(). As we move towards more generic code to take care of the required OPPs, where we will recursively call dev_pm_opp_set_opp() for all the required OPPs, the above special case becomes a problem. It doesn't make sense for a device's DT entry to have both "opp-level" and single "required-opps" entry pointing to a genpd's OPP, as that would make the OPP core call dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state() for two different values for the same device structure. And so we can reuse the 'opp->level" field in such a case and call _set_opp_level() for the device. Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
073d3d2ca7
commit
6d366d0e54
@ -1088,10 +1088,12 @@ static int _opp_set_required_opps_generic(struct device *dev,
|
||||
static int _opp_set_required_opps_genpd(struct device *dev,
|
||||
struct opp_table *opp_table, struct dev_pm_opp *opp, bool scaling_down)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct device **genpd_virt_devs =
|
||||
opp_table->genpd_virt_devs ? opp_table->genpd_virt_devs : &dev;
|
||||
struct device **genpd_virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
|
||||
int index, target, delta, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!genpd_virt_devs)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Scaling up? Set required OPPs in normal order, else reverse */
|
||||
if (!scaling_down) {
|
||||
index = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ void _of_clear_opp(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
|
||||
of_node_put(opp->np);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
|
||||
static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct opp_table *opp_table,
|
||||
struct opp_table *required_table, int index)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct device_node *np;
|
||||
@ -314,6 +314,31 @@ static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There are two genpd (as required-opp) cases that we need to handle,
|
||||
* devices with a single genpd and ones with multiple genpds.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The single genpd case requires special handling as we need to use the
|
||||
* same `dev` structure (instead of a virtual one provided by genpd
|
||||
* core) for setting the performance state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It doesn't make sense for a device's DT entry to have both
|
||||
* "opp-level" and single "required-opps" entry pointing to a genpd's
|
||||
* OPP, as that would make the OPP core call
|
||||
* dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state() for two different values for
|
||||
* the same device structure. Lets treat single genpd configuration as a
|
||||
* case where the OPP's level is directly available without required-opp
|
||||
* link in the DT.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Just update the `level` with the right value, which
|
||||
* dev_pm_opp_set_opp() will take care of in the normal path itself.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (required_table->is_genpd && opp_table->required_opp_count == 1 &&
|
||||
!opp_table->genpd_virt_devs) {
|
||||
if (!WARN_ON(opp->level != OPP_LEVEL_UNSET))
|
||||
opp->level = opp->required_opps[0]->level;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -338,7 +363,7 @@ static int _of_opp_alloc_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table,
|
||||
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(required_table))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = _link_required_opps(opp, required_table, i);
|
||||
ret = _link_required_opps(opp, opp_table, required_table, i);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto free_required_opps;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -359,7 +384,7 @@ static int lazy_link_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table,
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(opp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
|
||||
ret = _link_required_opps(opp, new_table, index);
|
||||
ret = _link_required_opps(opp, opp_table, new_table, index);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user