powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures
Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some cases even incorrect logic. It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific. PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given logical index. This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node. This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library. It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it. Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
007fb9aedc
commit
819d596568
@ -865,45 +865,63 @@ static int __init prom_reconfig_setup(void)
|
||||
__initcall(prom_reconfig_setup);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (int)phys_id == get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool __of_find_n_match_cpu_property(struct device_node *cpun,
|
||||
const char *prop_name, int cpu, unsigned int *thread)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const __be32 *cell;
|
||||
int ac, prop_len, tid;
|
||||
u64 hwid;
|
||||
|
||||
ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun);
|
||||
cell = of_get_property(cpun, prop_name, &prop_len);
|
||||
if (!cell)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
prop_len /= sizeof(*cell);
|
||||
for (tid = 0; tid < prop_len; tid++) {
|
||||
hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
|
||||
if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid)) {
|
||||
if (thread)
|
||||
*thread = tid;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
cell += ac;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Find the device node for a given logical cpu number, also returns the cpu
|
||||
* local thread number (index in ibm,interrupt-server#s) if relevant and
|
||||
* asked for (non NULL)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int hardid;
|
||||
struct device_node *np;
|
||||
struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
|
||||
|
||||
hardid = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
|
||||
cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
|
||||
if (!cpus) {
|
||||
pr_warn("Missing cpus node, bailing out\n");
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") {
|
||||
const u32 *intserv;
|
||||
unsigned int plen, t;
|
||||
for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
|
||||
if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s. If it doesn't exist
|
||||
* fallback to "reg" property and assume no threads
|
||||
/* Check for non-standard "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" property
|
||||
* for thread ids on PowerPC. If it doesn't exist fallback to
|
||||
* standard "reg" property.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
intserv = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s",
|
||||
&plen);
|
||||
if (intserv == NULL) {
|
||||
const u32 *reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL);
|
||||
if (reg == NULL)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (*reg == hardid) {
|
||||
if (thread)
|
||||
*thread = 0;
|
||||
return np;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
plen /= sizeof(u32);
|
||||
for (t = 0; t < plen; t++) {
|
||||
if (hardid == intserv[t]) {
|
||||
if (thread)
|
||||
*thread = t;
|
||||
return np;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun,
|
||||
"ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", cpu, thread))
|
||||
return cpun;
|
||||
|
||||
if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, "reg", cpu, thread))
|
||||
return cpun;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user