cxl: Do adapter fence check before handling afu interrupt
If an afu interrupt is in flight when an eeh error is triggered the control still reaches the function native_irq_multiplexed and the PE-Handle read from the CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An register is 0xffff. The function then erroneously assumes that the interrupt belonged to a detached context and generates a warning with full stack dump in the kernel log complaining: "Unable to demultiplex CXL PSL IRQ for PE 65535 DSISR ffffffff DAR ffffffff. (Possible AFU HW issue - was a term/remove acked with outstanding transactions" To fix this the patch adds new code to the function native_irq_multiplexed function to compares the read value of register CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An to ~0ULL. If true then logs a warning message saying that the interrupt is being ignored and returns IRQ_HANDLED from the irq handler. Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb81733de2
commit
abf051be68
@ -931,9 +931,18 @@ static irqreturn_t native_irq_multiplexed(int irq, void *data)
|
||||
struct cxl_afu *afu = data;
|
||||
struct cxl_context *ctx;
|
||||
struct cxl_irq_info irq_info;
|
||||
int ph = cxl_p2n_read(afu, CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An) & 0xffff;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
u64 phreg = cxl_p2n_read(afu, CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An);
|
||||
int ph, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* check if eeh kicked in while the interrupt was in flight */
|
||||
if (unlikely(phreg == ~0ULL)) {
|
||||
dev_warn(&afu->dev,
|
||||
"Ignoring slice interrupt(%d) due to fenced card",
|
||||
irq);
|
||||
return IRQ_HANDLED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Mask the pe-handle from register value */
|
||||
ph = phreg & 0xffff;
|
||||
if ((ret = native_get_irq_info(afu, &irq_info))) {
|
||||
WARN(1, "Unable to get CXL IRQ Info: %i\n", ret);
|
||||
return fail_psl_irq(afu, &irq_info);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user