locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless
The new rt_mutex_spin_on_onwer() loop checks whether the spinning waiter is still the top waiter on the lock by utilizing rt_mutex_top_waiter(), which is broken because that function contains a sanity check which dereferences the top waiter pointer to check whether the waiter belongs to the lock. That's wrong in the lockless spinwait case: CPU 0 CPU 1 rt_mutex_lock(lock) rt_mutex_lock(lock); queue(waiter0) waiter0 == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock) rt_mutex_spin_on_onwer(lock, waiter0) { queue(waiter1) waiter1 == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock) ... top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock) leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters); -> signal dequeue(waiter1) destroy(waiter1) w = rb_entry(leftmost, ....) BUG_ON(w->lock != lock) <- UAF The BUG_ON() is correct for the case where the caller holds lock->wait_lock which guarantees that the leftmost waiter entry cannot vanish. For the lockless spinwait case it's broken. Create a new helper function which avoids the pointer dereference and just compares the leftmost entry pointer with current's waiter pointer to validate that currrent is still elegible for spinning. Fixes: 992caf7f1724 ("locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism") Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210825102453.981720644@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
99409b935c
commit
c3123c4314
@ -1329,8 +1329,9 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
* for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y)
|
||||
* - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!owner->on_cpu || waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock) ||
|
||||
need_resched() || vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
|
||||
if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched() ||
|
||||
rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter) ||
|
||||
vcpu_is_preempted(task_cpu(owner))) {
|
||||
res = false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -95,6 +95,19 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
|
||||
return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters.rb_root);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Lockless speculative check whether @waiter is still the top waiter on
|
||||
* @lock. This is solely comparing pointers and not derefencing the
|
||||
* leftmost entry which might be about to vanish.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
|
||||
|
||||
return rb_entry(leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry) == waiter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user