seq_file: disallow extremely large seq buffer allocations
commit 8cae8cd89f05f6de223d63e6d15e31c8ba9cf53b upstream. There is no reasonable need for a buffer larger than this, and it avoids int overflow pitfalls. Fixes: 058504edd026 ("fs/seq_file: fallback to vmalloc allocation") Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reported-by: Qualys Security Advisory <qsa@qualys.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8be8d4ba1c
commit
c5157b3e77
@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ static void *seq_buf_alloc(unsigned long size)
|
||||
void *buf;
|
||||
gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(size > MAX_RW_COUNT))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For high order allocations, use __GFP_NORETRY to avoid oom-killing -
|
||||
* it's better to fall back to vmalloc() than to kill things. For small
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user