sctp: abandon the whole msg if one part of a fragmented message is abandoned
As rfc3758#section-3.1 demands: A3) When a TSN is "abandoned", if it is part of a fragmented message, all other TSN's within that fragmented message MUST be abandoned at the same time. Besides, if it couldn't handle this, the rest frags would never get assembled in peer side. This patch supports it by adding abandoned flag in sctp_datamsg, when one chunk is being abandoned, set chunk->msg->abandoned as well. Next time when checking for abandoned, go checking chunk->msg->abandoned first. Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d30fc5126e
commit
e5f612969c
@ -503,7 +503,8 @@ struct sctp_datamsg {
|
||||
/* Did the messenge fail to send? */
|
||||
int send_error;
|
||||
u8 send_failed:1,
|
||||
can_delay; /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
|
||||
can_delay:1, /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
|
||||
abandoned:1; /* should this message be abandoned */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *,
|
||||
|
@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static void sctp_datamsg_init(struct sctp_datamsg *msg)
|
||||
msg->send_failed = 0;
|
||||
msg->send_error = 0;
|
||||
msg->can_delay = 1;
|
||||
msg->abandoned = 0;
|
||||
msg->expires_at = 0;
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->chunks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -304,6 +305,9 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
|
||||
if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (chunk->msg->abandoned)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
|
||||
time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
|
||||
struct sctp_stream_out *streamout =
|
||||
@ -316,6 +320,7 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
|
||||
chunk->asoc->abandoned_unsent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(TTL)]++;
|
||||
streamout->ext->abandoned_unsent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(TTL)]++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
chunk->msg->abandoned = 1;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else if (SCTP_PR_RTX_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
|
||||
chunk->sent_count > chunk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive) {
|
||||
@ -324,10 +329,12 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
|
||||
|
||||
chunk->asoc->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
|
||||
streamout->ext->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
|
||||
chunk->msg->abandoned = 1;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else if (!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
|
||||
chunk->msg->expires_at &&
|
||||
time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
|
||||
chunk->msg->abandoned = 1;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* PRIO policy is processed by sendmsg, not here */
|
||||
|
@ -364,10 +364,12 @@ static int sctp_prsctp_prune_sent(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(chk, temp, queue, transmitted_list) {
|
||||
struct sctp_stream_out *streamout;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
|
||||
chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive)
|
||||
if (!chk->msg->abandoned &&
|
||||
(!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
|
||||
chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
chk->msg->abandoned = 1;
|
||||
list_del_init(&chk->transmitted_list);
|
||||
sctp_insert_list(&asoc->outqueue.abandoned,
|
||||
&chk->transmitted_list);
|
||||
@ -404,10 +406,12 @@ static int sctp_prsctp_prune_unsent(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
q->sched->unsched_all(&asoc->stream);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(chk, temp, &q->out_chunk_list, list) {
|
||||
if (!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
|
||||
chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive)
|
||||
if (!chk->msg->abandoned &&
|
||||
(!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
|
||||
chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
chk->msg->abandoned = 1;
|
||||
sctp_sched_dequeue_common(q, chk);
|
||||
asoc->sent_cnt_removable--;
|
||||
asoc->abandoned_unsent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(PRIO)]++;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user