IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit ec2b9a5e11e51fea1bb04c1e7e471952e887e874 ]
Currently, it's possible to pass in a modified CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to
a global function as an argument. The adverse effects of this is that
BPF helpers can continue to make use of this modified
CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR from within the context of the global function,
which can unintentionally result in out-of-bounds memory accesses and
therefore compromise overall system stability i.e.
[ 244.157771] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140
[ 244.161345] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810914be68 by task test_progs/302
[ 244.167151] CPU: 0 PID: 302 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G O E 6.10.0-rc3-00131-g66b586715063 #533
[ 244.174318] Call Trace:
[ 244.175787] <TASK>
[ 244.177356] dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0
[ 244.179531] print_report+0xce/0x670
[ 244.182314] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x200/0x3e0
[ 244.184908] kasan_report+0xd7/0x110
[ 244.187408] ? bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140
[ 244.189714] ? bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140
[ 244.192020] bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140
[ 244.194264] bpf_prog_b02a02fdd2bdc5fa_global_call_bpf_dynptr_data+0x22/0x26
[ 244.198044] bpf_prog_b0fe7b9d7dc3abde_callback_adjust_bpf_dynptr_reg_off+0x1f/0x23
[ 244.202136] bpf_user_ringbuf_drain+0x2c7/0x570
[ 244.204744] ? 0xffffffffc0009e58
[ 244.206593] ? __pfx_bpf_user_ringbuf_drain+0x10/0x10
[ 244.209795] bpf_prog_33ab33f6a804ba2d_user_ringbuf_callback_const_ptr_to_dynptr_reg_off+0x47/0x4b
[ 244.215922] bpf_trampoline_6442502480+0x43/0xe3
[ 244.218691] __x64_sys_prlimit64+0x9/0xf0
[ 244.220912] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x1d0
[ 244.223043] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[ 244.226458] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa3eb8f059
[ 244.228582] Code: 08 89 e8 5b 5d c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 8f 1d 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 244.241307] RSP: 002b:00007ffa3e9c6eb8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012e
[ 244.246474] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffa3e9c7cdc RCX: 00007ffa3eb8f059
[ 244.250478] RDX: 00007ffa3eb162b4 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007ffa3e9c7fb0
[ 244.255396] RBP: 00007ffa3e9c6ed0 R08: 00007ffa3e9c76c0 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 244.260195] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: ffffffffffffff80
[ 244.264201] R13: 000000000000001c R14: 00007ffc5d6b4260 R15: 00007ffa3e1c7000
[ 244.268303] </TASK>
Add a check_func_arg_reg_off() to the path in which the BPF verifier
verifies the arguments of global function arguments, specifically
those which take an argument of type ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR |
MEM_RDONLY. Also, process_dynptr_func() doesn't appear to perform any
explicit and strict type matching on the supplied register type, so
let's also enforce that a register either type PTR_TO_STACK or
CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR is by the caller.
Reported-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240625062857.92760-1-mattbobrowski@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4a04b4f0de59dd5c621e78f15803ee0b0544eeb8 ]
adjust_jmp_off() incorrectly used the insn->imm field for all overflow check,
which is incorrect as that should only be done or the BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA case,
not the general jump instruction case. Fix it by using insn->off for overflow
check in the general case.
Fixes: 5337ac4c9b80 ("bpf: Fix the corner case with may_goto and jump to the 1st insn.")
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240712080127.136608-2-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit df34ec9db6f521118895f22795da49f2ec01f8cf ]
Zero-extending results of atomic probe operations fails with:
verifier bug. zext_dst is set, but no reg is defined
The problem is that insn_def_regno() handles BPF_ATOMICs, but not
BPF_PROBE_ATOMICs. Fix by adding the missing condition.
Fixes: d503a04f8bc0 ("bpf: Add support for certain atomics in bpf_arena to x86 JIT")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240701234304.14336-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Zac's syzbot crafted a bpf prog that exposed two bugs in may_goto.
The 1st bug is the way may_goto is patched. When offset is negative
it should be patched differently.
The 2nd bug is in the verifier:
when current state may_goto_depth is equal to visited state may_goto_depth
it means there is an actual infinite loop. It's not correct to prune
exploration of the program at this point.
Note, that this check doesn't limit the program to only one may_goto insn,
since 2nd and any further may_goto will increment may_goto_depth only
in the queued state pushed for future exploration. The current state
will have may_goto_depth == 0 regardless of number of may_goto insns
and the verifier has to explore the program until bpf_exit.
Fixes: 011832b97b31 ("bpf: Introduce may_goto instruction")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQL-15aNp04-cyHRn47Yv61NXfYyhopyZtUyxNojUZUXpA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240619235355.85031-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
When the following program is processed by the verifier:
L1: may_goto L2
goto L1
L2: w0 = 0
exit
the may_goto insn is first converted to:
L1: r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)
if r11 == 0x0 goto L2
r11 -= 1
*(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r11
goto L1
L2: w0 = 0
exit
then later as the last step the verifier inserts:
*(u64 *)(r10 -8) = BPF_MAX_LOOPS
as the first insn of the program to initialize loop count.
When the first insn happens to be a branch target of some jmp the
bpf_patch_insn_data() logic will produce:
L1: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = BPF_MAX_LOOPS
r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)
if r11 == 0x0 goto L2
r11 -= 1
*(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r11
goto L1
L2: w0 = 0
exit
because instruction patching adjusts all jmps and calls, but for this
particular corner case it's incorrect and the L1 label should be one
instruction down, like:
*(u64 *)(r10 -8) = BPF_MAX_LOOPS
L1: r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)
if r11 == 0x0 goto L2
r11 -= 1
*(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r11
goto L1
L2: w0 = 0
exit
and that's what this patch is fixing.
After bpf_patch_insn_data() call adjust_jmp_off() to adjust all jmps
that point to newly insert BPF_ST insn to point to insn after.
Note that bpf_patch_insn_data() cannot easily be changed to accommodate
this logic, since jumps that point before or after a sequence of patched
instructions have to be adjusted with the full length of the patch.
Conceptually it's somewhat similar to "insert" of instructions between other
instructions with weird semantics. Like "insert" before 1st insn would require
adjustment of CALL insns to point to newly inserted 1st insn, but not an
adjustment JMP insns that point to 1st, yet still adjusting JMP insns that
cross over 1st insn (point to insn before or insn after), hence use simple
adjust_jmp_off() logic to fix this corner case. Ideally bpf_patch_insn_data()
would have an auxiliary info to say where 'the start of newly inserted patch
is', but it would be too complex for backport.
Fixes: 011832b97b31 ("bpf: Introduce may_goto instruction")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ_WWx8w4b=6Gc2EpzAjgv+6A0ridnMz2TvS2egj4r3Gw@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240619011859.79334-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
In coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(), for the case where upper
sign extension bits are the same for smax32 and smin32
values, we missed to setup properly. This is especially
problematic if both smax32 and smin32's sign extension
bits are 1.
The following is a simple example illustrating the inconsistent
verifier states due to missed var_off:
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar()
1: (bf) r3 = r0 ; R0_w=scalar(id=1) R3_w=scalar(id=1)
2: (57) r3 &= 15 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=15,var_off=(0x0; 0xf))
3: (47) r3 |= 128 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=128,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=143,var_off=(0x80; 0xf))
4: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (alu): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f]
u32=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s32=[0x80, 0xffffff8f] var_off=(0x80, 0xf)
The var_off=(0x80, 0xf) is not correct, and the correct one should
be var_off=(0xffffff80; 0xf) since from insn 3, we know that at
insn 4, the sign extension bits will be 1. This patch fixed this
issue by setting var_off properly.
Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174632.3995278-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Zac reported a verification failure and Alexei reproduced the issue
with a simple reproducer ([1]). The verification failure is due to missed
setting for var_off.
The following is the reproducer in [1]:
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387) ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
2: (36) if w7 >= 0x2533823b goto pc-3
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 2 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387)
2: R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
3: (b4) w0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
4: (95) exit
Note that after insn 1, the var_off for R7 is (0x0; 0x7f). This is not correct
since upper 24 bits of w7 could be 0 or 1. So correct var_off should be
(0x0; 0xffffffff). Missing var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val() caused later
incorrect analysis in zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) and reg_bounds_sync(dst_reg).
To fix the issue, set var_off correctly in set_sext32_default_val(). The correct
reg state after insn 1 becomes:
1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ;
R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
R7_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=-128,smax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
and at insn 2, the verifier correctly determines either branch is possible.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLPU0Shz7dWV4bn2BgtGdxN3uFHPeobGBA72tpg5Xoykw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174626.3994813-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
pcpu_hot (defined in arch/x86) is not available on user mode linux (ARCH=um)
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613173146.2524647-1-maze@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The fake_reg moved into env->fake_reg given it consumes a lot of stack
space (120 bytes). Migrate the fake_reg in check_stack_write_fixed_off()
as well now that we have it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613115310.25383-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Juan reported that after doing some changes to buzzer [0] and implementing
a new fuzzing strategy guided by coverage, they noticed the following in
one of the probes:
[...]
13: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) ; R0=map_value(ks=4,vs=8) R6_w=scalar()
14: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
15: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff
16: (74) w0 >>= 1 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff
17: (5c) w6 &= w0 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff R6_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff))
18: (44) w6 |= 2 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd))
19: (56) if w6 != 0x7ffffffd goto pc+1
REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (true_reg2): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0)
REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg1): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0)
REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg2): const tnum out of sync with range bounds u64=[0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff] s64=[0x8000000000000000, 0x7fffffffffffffff] u32=[0x0, 0xffffffff] s32=[0x80000000, 0x7fffffff] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0)
19: R6_w=0x7fffffff
20: (95) exit
from 19 to 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm
21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm
21: (14) w6 -= 2147483632 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=14,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd))
22: (76) if w6 s>= 0xe goto pc+1 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=13,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd))
23: (95) exit
from 22 to 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm
24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm
24: (14) w6 -= 14 ; R6_w=0
[...]
What can be seen here is a register invariant violation on line 19. After
the binary-or in line 18, the verifier knows that bit 2 is set but knows
nothing about the rest of the content which was loaded from a map value,
meaning, range is [2,0x7fffffff] with var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd). When in
line 19 the verifier analyzes the branch, it splits the register states
in reg_set_min_max() into the registers of the true branch (true_reg1,
true_reg2) and the registers of the false branch (false_reg1, false_reg2).
Since the test is w6 != 0x7ffffffd, the src_reg is a known constant.
Internally, the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized as scalar
to the value of 0x7ffffffd, and then passes it onto reg_set_min_max(). Now,
for line 19, it is mathematically impossible to take the false branch of
this program, yet the verifier analyzes it. It is impossible because the
second bit of r6 will be set due to the prior or operation and the
constant in the condition has that bit unset (hex(fd) == binary(1111 1101).
When the verifier first analyzes the false / fall-through branch, it will
compute an intersection between the var_off of r6 and of the constant. This
is because the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized to the value
of the constant. The intersection result later refines both registers in
regs_refine_cond_op():
[...]
t = tnum_intersect(tnum_subreg(reg1->var_off), tnum_subreg(reg2->var_off));
reg1->var_off = tnum_with_subreg(reg1->var_off, t);
reg2->var_off = tnum_with_subreg(reg2->var_off, t);
[...]
Since the verifier is analyzing the false branch of the conditional jump,
reg1 is equal to false_reg1 and reg2 is equal to false_reg2, i.e. the reg2
is the "fake" register that was meant to hold a constant value. The resulting
var_off of the intersection says that both registers now hold a known value
of var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) or in other words: this operation manages to
make the verifier think that the "constant" value that was passed in the
jump operation now holds a different value.
Normally this would not be an issue since it should not influence the true
branch, however, false_reg2 and true_reg2 are pointers to the same "fake"
register. Meaning, the false branch can influence the results of the true
branch. In line 24, the verifier assumes R6_w=0, but the actual runtime
value in this case is 1. The fix is simply not passing in the same "fake"
register location as inputs to reg_set_min_max(), but instead making a
copy. Moving the fake_reg into the env also reduces stack consumption by
120 bytes. With this, the verifier successfully rejects invalid accesses
from the test program.
[0] https://github.com/google/buzzer
Fixes: 67420501e868 ("bpf: generalize reg_set_min_max() to handle non-const register comparisons")
Reported-by: Juan José López Jaimez <jjlopezjaimez@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613115310.25383-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The bpf_session_cookie is unavailable for !CONFIG_FPROBE as reported
by Sebastian [1].
To fix that we remove CONFIG_FPROBE ifdef for session kfuncs, which
is fine, because there's filter for session programs.
Then based on bpf_trace.o dependency:
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS) += bpf_trace.o
we add bpf_session_cookie BTF_ID in special_kfunc_set list dependency
on CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240531071557.MvfIqkn7@linutronix.de/T/#m71c6d5ec71db2967288cb79acedc15cc5dbfeec5
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5c919acef8514 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240531194500.2967187-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to
a tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete
on a sockmap/sockhash.
We don't intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the
existing verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash
to also cover deleting from a map.
From now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update
sockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types.
Fixes: ff9105993240 ("bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Reported-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ec941d6e24f633a59172
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240527-sockmap-verify-deletes-v1-1-944b372f2101@cloudflare.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZkGcZAAKCRDbK58LschI
g6o6APwLsqhrM2w71VUN5ciCxu4H5VDtZp6wkdqtVbxxU4qNxQEApKgYgKt8ZLF3
Kily5c7m+S4ZXhMX21rb8JhSAz0dfQk=
=5Dk7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2024-05-13
We've added 119 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain
a total of 134 files changed, 9462 insertions(+), 4742 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add BPF JIT support for 32-bit ARCv2 processors, from Shahab Vahedi.
2) Add BPF range computation improvements to the verifier in particular
around XOR and OR operators, refactoring of checks for range computation
and relaxing MUL range computation so that src_reg can also be an unknown
scalar, from Cupertino Miranda.
3) Add support to attach kprobe BPF programs through kprobe_multi link in
a session mode, meaning, a BPF program is attached to both function entry
and return, the entry program can decide if the return program gets
executed and the entry program can share u64 cookie value with return
program. Session mode is a common use-case for tetragon and bpftrace,
from Jiri Olsa.
4) Fix a potential overflow in libbpf's ring__consume_n() and improve libbpf
as well as BPF selftest's struct_ops handling, from Andrii Nakryiko.
5) Improvements to BPF selftests in context of BPF gcc backend,
from Jose E. Marchesi & David Faust.
6) Migrate remaining BPF selftest tests from test_sock_addr.c to prog_test-
-style in order to retire the old test, run it in BPF CI and additionally
expand test coverage, from Jordan Rife.
7) Big batch for BPF selftest refactoring in order to remove duplicate code
around common network helpers, from Geliang Tang.
8) Another batch of improvements to BPF selftests to retire obsolete
bpf_tcp_helpers.h as everything is available vmlinux.h,
from Martin KaFai Lau.
9) Fix BPF map tear-down to not walk the map twice on free when both timer
and wq is used, from Benjamin Tissoires.
10) Fix BPF verifier assumptions about socket->sk that it can be non-NULL,
from Alexei Starovoitov.
11) Change BTF build scripts to using --btf_features for pahole v1.26+,
from Alan Maguire.
12) Small improvements to BPF reusing struct_size() and krealloc_array(),
from Andy Shevchenko.
13) Fix s390 JIT to emit a barrier for BPF_FETCH instructions,
from Ilya Leoshkevich.
14) Extend TCP ->cong_control() callback in order to feed in ack and
flag parameters and allow write-access to tp->snd_cwnd_stamp
from BPF program, from Miao Xu.
15) Add support for internal-only per-CPU instructions to inline
bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper call for arm64 and riscv64 BPF JITs,
from Puranjay Mohan.
16) Follow-up to remove the redundant ethtool.h from tooling infrastructure,
from Tushar Vyavahare.
17) Extend libbpf to support "module:<function>" syntax for tracing
programs, from Viktor Malik.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (119 commits)
bpf: make list_for_each_entry portable
bpf: ignore expected GCC warning in test_global_func10.c
bpf: disable strict aliasing in test_global_func9.c
selftests/bpf: Free strdup memory in xdp_hw_metadata
selftests/bpf: Fix a few tests for GCC related warnings.
bpf: avoid gcc overflow warning in test_xdp_vlan.c
tools: remove redundant ethtool.h from tooling infra
selftests/bpf: Expand ATTACH_REJECT tests
selftests/bpf: Expand getsockname and getpeername tests
sefltests/bpf: Expand sockaddr hook deny tests
selftests/bpf: Expand sockaddr program return value tests
selftests/bpf: Retire test_sock_addr.(c|sh)
selftests/bpf: Remove redundant sendmsg test cases
selftests/bpf: Migrate ATTACH_REJECT test cases
selftests/bpf: Migrate expected_attach_type tests
selftests/bpf: Migrate wildcard destination rewrite test
selftests/bpf: Migrate sendmsg6 v4 mapped address tests
selftests/bpf: Migrate sendmsg deny test cases
selftests/bpf: Migrate WILDCARD_IP test
selftests/bpf: Handle SYSCALL_EPERM and SYSCALL_ENOTSUPP test cases
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513134114.17575-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Inline the calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in the riscv bpf jit.
RISCV saves the pointer to the CPU's task_struct in the TP (thread
pointer) register. This makes it trivial to get the CPU's processor id.
As thread_info is the first member of task_struct, we can read the
processor id from TP + offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu).
RISCV64 JIT output for `call bpf_get_smp_processor_id`
======================================================
Before After
-------- -------
auipc t1,0x848c ld a5,32(tp)
jalr 604(t1)
mv a5,a0
Benchmark using [1] on Qemu.
./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc
+---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------+
| Name | Before | After | % change |
|---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------|
| glob-arr-inc | 1.077 ± 0.006M/s | 1.336 ± 0.010M/s | + 24.04% |
| arr-inc | 1.078 ± 0.002M/s | 1.332 ± 0.015M/s | + 23.56% |
| hash-inc | 0.494 ± 0.004M/s | 0.653 ± 0.001M/s | + 32.18% |
+---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------+
NOTE: This benchmark includes changes from this patch and the previous
patch that implemented the per-cpu insn.
[1] https://github.com/anakryiko/linux/commit/8dec900975ef
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502151854.9810-3-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
MUL instruction required that src_reg would be a known value (i.e.
src_reg would be a const value). The condition in this case can be
relaxed, since the range computation algorithm used in current code
already supports a proper range computation for any valid range value on
its operands.
Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>
Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-6-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Range for XOR and OR operators would not be attempted unless src_reg
would resolve to a single value, i.e. a known constant value.
This condition is unnecessary, and the following XOR/OR operator
handling could compute a possible better range.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>
Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-4-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Split range computation checks in its own function, isolating pessimitic
range set for dst_reg and failing return to a single point.
Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>
Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
bpf/verifier: improve code after range computation recent changes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-3-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In order to further simplify the code in adjust_scalar_min_max_vals all
the calls to mark_reg_unknown are replaced by __mark_reg_unknown.
static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno)
{
if (WARN_ON(regno >= MAX_BPF_REG)) {
... mark all regs not init ...
return;
}
__mark_reg_unknown(env, regs + regno);
}
The 'regno >= MAX_BPF_REG' does not apply to
adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), because it is only called from the
following stack:
- check_alu_op
- adjust_reg_min_max_vals
- adjust_scalar_min_max_vals
The check_alu_op() does check_reg_arg() which verifies that both src and
dst register numbers are within bounds.
Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com>
Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
Conflicts:
include/linux/filter.h
kernel/bpf/core.c
66e13b615a0c ("bpf: verifier: prevent userspace memory access")
d503a04f8bc0 ("bpf: Add support for certain atomics in bpf_arena to x86 JIT")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240429114939.210328b0@canb.auug.org.au/
No adjacent changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Adding support for cookie within the session of kprobe multi
entry and return program.
The session cookie is u64 value and can be retrieved be new
kfunc bpf_session_cookie, which returns pointer to the cookie
value. The bpf program can use the pointer to store (on entry)
and load (on return) the value.
The cookie value is implemented via fprobe feature that allows
to share values between entry and return ftrace fprobe callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240430112830.1184228-4-jolsa@kernel.org
The verifier assumes that 'sk' field in 'struct socket' is valid
and non-NULL when 'socket' pointer itself is trusted and non-NULL.
That may not be the case when socket was just created and
passed to LSM socket_accept hook.
Fix this verifier assumption and adjust tests.
Reported-by: Liam Wisehart <liamwisehart@meta.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240427002544.68803-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZi9+AAAKCRDbK58LschI
g0nEAP487m7L0nLVriC2oIOWsi29tklW3etm6DO7gmGRGIHgrgEAnMyV1xBj3bGj
v6jJwDcybCym1hLx+1x1JCZ4eoAFswE=
=xbna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2024-04-29
We've added 147 non-merge commits during the last 32 day(s) which contain
a total of 158 files changed, 9400 insertions(+), 2213 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add an internal-only BPF per-CPU instruction for resolving per-CPU
memory addresses and implement support in x86 BPF JIT. This allows
inlining per-CPU array and hashmap lookups
and the bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper, from Andrii Nakryiko.
2) Add BPF link support for sk_msg and sk_skb programs, from Yonghong Song.
3) Optimize x86 BPF JIT's emit_mov_imm64, and add support for various
atomics in bpf_arena which can be JITed as a single x86 instruction,
from Alexei Starovoitov.
4) Add support for passing mark with bpf_fib_lookup helper,
from Anton Protopopov.
5) Add a new bpf_wq API for deferring events and refactor sleepable
bpf_timer code to keep common code where possible,
from Benjamin Tissoires.
6) Fix BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN infra with regards to bpf_dummy_struct_ops programs
to check when NULL is passed for non-NULLable parameters,
from Eduard Zingerman.
7) Harden the BPF verifier's and/or/xor value tracking,
from Harishankar Vishwanathan.
8) Introduce crypto kfuncs to make BPF programs able to utilize the kernel
crypto subsystem, from Vadim Fedorenko.
9) Various improvements to the BPF instruction set standardization doc,
from Dave Thaler.
10) Extend libbpf APIs to partially consume items from the BPF ringbuffer,
from Andrea Righi.
11) Bigger batch of BPF selftests refactoring to use common network helpers
and to drop duplicate code, from Geliang Tang.
12) Support bpf_tail_call_static() helper for BPF programs with GCC 13,
from Jose E. Marchesi.
13) Add bpf_preempt_{disable,enable}() kfuncs in order to allow a BPF
program to have code sections where preemption is disabled,
from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
14) Allow invoking BPF kfuncs from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL programs,
from David Vernet.
15) Extend the BPF verifier to allow different input maps for a given
bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper call in a BPF program, from Philo Lu.
16) Add support for PROBE_MEM32 and bpf_addr_space_cast instructions
for riscv64 and arm64 JITs to enable BPF Arena, from Puranjay Mohan.
17) Shut up a false-positive KMSAN splat in interpreter mode by unpoison
the stack memory, from Martin KaFai Lau.
18) Improve xsk selftest coverage with new tests on maximum and minimum
hardware ring size configurations, from Tushar Vyavahare.
19) Various ReST man pages fixes as well as documentation and bash completion
improvements for bpftool, from Rameez Rehman & Quentin Monnet.
20) Fix libbpf with regards to dumping subsequent char arrays,
from Quentin Deslandes.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (147 commits)
bpf, docs: Clarify PC use in instruction-set.rst
bpf_helpers.h: Define bpf_tail_call_static when building with GCC
bpf, docs: Add introduction for use in the ISA Internet Draft
selftests/bpf: extend BPF_SOCK_OPS_RTT_CB test for srtt and mrtt_us
bpf: add mrtt and srtt as BPF_SOCK_OPS_RTT_CB args
selftests/bpf: dummy_st_ops should reject 0 for non-nullable params
bpf: check bpf_dummy_struct_ops program params for test runs
selftests/bpf: do not pass NULL for non-nullable params in dummy_st_ops
selftests/bpf: adjust dummy_st_ops_success to detect additional error
bpf: mark bpf_dummy_struct_ops.test_1 parameter as nullable
selftests/bpf: Add ring_buffer__consume_n test.
bpf: Add bpf_guard_preempt() convenience macro
selftests: bpf: crypto: add benchmark for crypto functions
selftests: bpf: crypto skcipher algo selftests
bpf: crypto: add skcipher to bpf crypto
bpf: make common crypto API for TC/XDP programs
bpf: update the comment for BTF_FIELDS_MAX
selftests/bpf: Fix wq test.
selftests/bpf: Use make_sockaddr in test_sock_addr
selftests/bpf: Use connect_to_addr in test_sock_addr
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240429131657.19423-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add crypto API support to BPF to be able to decrypt or encrypt packets
in TC/XDP BPF programs. Special care should be taken for initialization
part of crypto algo because crypto alloc) doesn't work with preemtion
disabled, it can be run only in sleepable BPF program. Also async crypto
is not supported because of the very same issue - TC/XDP BPF programs
are not sleepable.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422225024.2847039-2-vadfed@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Introduce two new BPF kfuncs, bpf_preempt_disable and
bpf_preempt_enable. These kfuncs allow disabling preemption in BPF
programs. Nesting is allowed, since the intended use cases includes
building native BPF spin locks without kernel helper involvement. Apart
from that, this can be used to per-CPU data structures for cases where
programs (or userspace) may preempt one or the other. Currently, while
per-CPU access is stable, whether it will be consistent is not
guaranteed, as only migration is disabled for BPF programs.
Global functions are disallowed from being called, but support for them
will be added as a follow up not just preempt kfuncs, but rcu_read_lock
kfuncs as well. Static subprog calls are permitted. Sleepable helpers
and kfuncs are disallowed in non-preemptible regions.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424031315.2757363-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To support sleepable async callbacks, we need to tell push_async_cb()
whether the cb is sleepable or not.
The verifier now detects that we are in bpf_wq_set_callback_impl and
can allow a sleepable callback to happen.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-13-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Introduce support for KF_ARG_PTR_TO_WORKQUEUE. The kfuncs will use bpf_wq
as argument and that will be recognized as workqueue argument by verifier.
bpf_wq_kern casting can happen inside kfunc, but using bpf_wq in
argument makes life easier for users who work with non-kern type in BPF
progs.
Duplicate process_timer_func into process_wq_func.
meta argument is only needed to ensure bpf_wq_init's workqueue and map
arguments are coming from the same map (map_uid logic is necessary for
correct inner-map handling), so also amend check_kfunc_args() to
match what helpers functions check is doing.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-8-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When a kfunc is declared with a KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MAP, we should have
reg->map_ptr set to a non NULL value, otherwise, that means that the
underlying type is not a map.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-7-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Mostly a copy/paste from the bpf_timer API, without the initialization
and free, as they will be done in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420-bpf_wq-v2-5-6c986a5a741f@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Found the following typos in comments, and fixed them:
s/unpriviledged/unprivileged/
s/reponsible/responsible/
s/possiblities/possibilities/
s/Divison/Division/
s/precsion/precision/
s/havea/have a/
s/reponsible/responsible/
s/responsibile/responsible/
s/tigher/tighter/
s/respecitve/respective/
Signed-off-by: Rafael Passos <rafael@rcpassos.me>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6af7deb4-bb24-49e8-b3f1-8dd410597337@smtp-relay.sendinblue.com
This patch addresses a latent unsoundness issue in the
scalar(32)_min_max_and/or/xor functions. While it is not a bugfix,
it ensures that the functions produce sound outputs for all inputs.
The issue occurs in these functions when setting signed bounds. The
following example illustrates the issue for scalar_min_max_and(),
but it applies to the other functions.
In scalar_min_max_and() the following clause is executed when ANDing
positive numbers:
/* ANDing two positives gives a positive, so safe to
* cast result into s64.
*/
dst_reg->smin_value = dst_reg->umin_value;
dst_reg->smax_value = dst_reg->umax_value;
However, if umin_value and umax_value of dst_reg cross the sign boundary
(i.e., if (s64)dst_reg->umin_value > (s64)dst_reg->umax_value), then we
will end up with smin_value > smax_value, which is unsound.
Previous works [1, 2] have discovered and reported this issue. Our tool
Agni [2, 3] consideres it a false positive. This is because, during the
verification of the abstract operator scalar_min_max_and(), Agni restricts
its inputs to those passing through reg_bounds_sync(). This mimics
real-world verifier behavior, as reg_bounds_sync() is invariably executed
at the tail of every abstract operator. Therefore, such behavior is
unlikely in an actual verifier execution.
However, it is still unsound for an abstract operator to set signed bounds
such that smin_value > smax_value. This patch fixes it, making the abstract
operator sound for all (well-formed) inputs.
It is worth noting that while the previous code updated the signed bounds
(using the output unsigned bounds) only when the *input signed* bounds
were positive, the new code updates them whenever the *output unsigned*
bounds do not cross the sign boundary.
An alternative approach to fix this latent unsoundness would be to
unconditionally set the signed bounds to unbounded [S64_MIN, S64_MAX], and
let reg_bounds_sync() refine the signed bounds using the unsigned bounds
and the tnum. We found that our approach produces more precise (tighter)
bounds.
For example, consider these inputs to BPF_AND:
/* dst_reg */
var_off.value: 8608032320201083347
var_off.mask: 615339716653692460
smin_value: 8070450532247928832
smax_value: 8070450532247928832
umin_value: 13206380674380886586
umax_value: 13206380674380886586
s32_min_value: -2110561598
s32_max_value: -133438816
u32_min_value: 4135055354
u32_max_value: 4135055354
/* src_reg */
var_off.value: 8584102546103074815
var_off.mask: 9862641527606476800
smin_value: 2920655011908158522
smax_value: 7495731535348625717
umin_value: 7001104867969363969
umax_value: 8584102543730304042
s32_min_value: -2097116671
s32_max_value: 71704632
u32_min_value: 1047457619
u32_max_value: 4268683090
After going through tnum_and() -> scalar32_min_max_and() ->
scalar_min_max_and() -> reg_bounds_sync(), our patch produces the following
bounds for s32:
s32_min_value: -1263875629
s32_max_value: -159911942
Whereas, setting the signed bounds to unbounded in scalar_min_max_and()
produces:
s32_min_value: -1263875629
s32_max_value: -1
As observed, our patch produces a tighter s32 bound. We also confirmed
using Agni and SMT verification that our patch always produces signed
bounds that are equal to or more precise than setting the signed bounds to
unbounded in scalar_min_max_and().
[1] https://sanjit-bhat.github.io/assets/pdf/ebpf-verifier-range-analysis22.pdf
[2] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37709-9_12
[3] https://github.com/bpfverif/agni
Co-developed-by: Matan Shachnai <m.shachnai@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Matan Shachnai <m.shachnai@rutgers.edu>
Co-developed-by: Srinivas Narayana <srinivas.narayana@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Narayana <srinivas.narayana@rutgers.edu>
Co-developed-by: Santosh Nagarakatte <santosh.nagarakatte@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Nagarakatte <santosh.nagarakatte@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Harishankar Vishwanathan <harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240402212039.51815-1-harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240416115303.331688-1-harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com
Long ago a map file descriptor in a pseudo ldimm64 instruction could
only be present as an immediate value insn[0].imm, and thus this value
was used in a verbose verifier message printed when the file descriptor
wasn't valid. Since addition of BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE/BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX
the insn[0].imm field can also contain an index pointing to the file
descriptor in the attr.fd_array array. However, if the file descriptor
is invalid, the verifier still prints the verbose message containing
value of insn[0].imm. Patch the verifier message to always print the
actual file descriptor value.
Fixes: 387544bfa291 ("bpf: Introduce fd_idx")
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240412141100.3562942-1-aspsk@isovalent.com
Support atomics in bpf_arena that can be JITed as a single x86 instruction.
Instructions that are JITed as loops are not supported at the moment,
since they require more complex extable and loop logic.
JITs can choose to do smarter things with bpf_jit_supports_insn().
Like arm64 may decide to support all bpf atomics instructions
when emit_lse_atomic is available and none in ll_sc mode.
bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn(), bpf_jit_supports_ptr_xchg() and
other such callbacks can be replaced with bpf_jit_supports_insn()
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405231134.17274-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Taking different maps within a single bpf_for_each_map_elem call is not
allowed before, because from the second map,
bpf_insn_aux_data->map_ptr_state will be marked as *poison*. In fact
both map_ptr and state are needed to support this use case: map_ptr is
used by set_map_elem_callback_state() while poison state is needed to
determine whether to use direct call.
Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405025536.18113-3-lulie@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Currently, bpf_insn_aux_data->map_ptr_state is used to store either
map_ptr or its poison state (i.e., BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON). Thus
BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON must be checked before reading map_ptr. In certain
cases, we may need valid map_ptr even in case of poison state.
This will be explained in next patch with bpf_for_each_map_elem()
helper.
This patch changes map_ptr_state into a new struct including both map
pointer and its state (poison/unpriv). It's in the same union with
struct bpf_loop_inline_state, so there is no extra memory overhead.
Besides, macros BPF_MAP_PTR_UNPRIV/BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON/BPF_MAP_PTR are no
longer needed.
This patch does not change any existing functionality.
Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405025536.18113-2-lulie@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The newly added code to handle bpf_get_branch_snapshot fails to link when
CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is disabled:
aarch64-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/verifier.o: in function `do_misc_fixups':
verifier.c:(.text+0x1090c): undefined reference to `__SCK__perf_snapshot_branch_stack'
Add a build-time check for that Kconfig symbol around the code to
remove the link time dependency.
Fixes: 314a53623cd4 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_branch_snapshot() helper")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405142637.577046-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
r10 is a special register that is not under BPF program's control and is
always effectively precise. The rest of precision logic assumes that
only r0-r9 SCALAR registers are marked as precise, so prevent r10 from
being marked precise.
This can happen due to signed cast instruction allowing to do something
like `r0 = (s8)r10;`, which later, if r0 needs to be precise, would lead
to an attempt to mark r10 as precise.
Prevent this with an extra check during instruction backtracking.
Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: syzbot+148110ee7cf72f39f33e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404214536.3551295-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Inline bpf_get_branch_snapshot() helper using architecture-agnostic
inline BPF code which calls directly into underlying callback of
perf_snapshot_branch_stack static call. This callback is set early
during kernel initialization and is never updated or reset, so it's ok
to fetch actual implementation using static_call_query() and call
directly into it.
This change eliminates a full function call and saves one LBR entry
in PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY LBR mode.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404002640.1774210-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When more than 64 maps are used by a program and its subprograms the
verifier returns -E2BIG. Add a verbose message which highlights the
source of the error and also print the actual limit.
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240402073347.195920-1-aspsk@isovalent.com
The resolve_pseudo_ldimm64() function might have leaked file
descriptors when BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARENA was used in a program (some
error paths missed a corresponding fdput). Add missing fdputs.
v2:
remove unrelated changes from the fix
Fixes: 6082b6c328b5 ("bpf: Recognize addr_space_cast instruction in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240329071106.67968-1-aspsk@isovalent.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF verifier emits "unknown func" message when given BPF program type
does not support BPF helper. This message may be confusing for users, as
important context that helper is unknown only to current program type is
not provided.
This patch changes message to "program of this type cannot use helper "
and aligns dependent code in libbpf and tests. Any suggestions on
improving/changing this message are welcome.
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240325152210.377548-1-yatsenko@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch re-introduces protection against the size of access to stack
memory being negative; the access size can appear negative as a result
of overflowing its signed int representation. This should not actually
happen, as there are other protections along the way, but we should
protect against it anyway. One code path was missing such protections
(fixed in the previous patch in the series), causing out-of-bounds array
accesses in check_stack_range_initialized(). This patch causes the
verification of a program with such a non-sensical access size to fail.
This check used to exist in a more indirect way, but was inadvertendly
removed in a833a17aeac7.
Fixes: a833a17aeac7 ("bpf: Fix verification of indirect var-off stack access")
Reported-by: syzbot+33f4297b5f927648741a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+aafd0513053a1cbf52ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLORV5PT0iTAhRER+iLBTkByCYNBYyvBSgjN1T31K+gOw@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327024245.318299-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The verifier allows using the addr_space_cast instruction in a program
that doesn't have an associated arena. This was caught in the form an
invalid memory access in do_misc_fixups() when while converting
addr_space_cast to a normal 32-bit mov, env->prog->aux->arena was
dereferenced to check for BPF_F_NO_USER_CONV flag.
Reject programs that include the addr_space_cast instruction but don't
have an associated arena.
root@rv-tester:~# ./reproducer
Unable to handle kernel access to user memory without uaccess routines at virtual address 0000000000000030
Oops [#1]
[<ffffffff8017eeaa>] do_misc_fixups+0x43c/0x1168
[<ffffffff801936d6>] bpf_check+0xda8/0x22b6
[<ffffffff80174b32>] bpf_prog_load+0x486/0x8dc
[<ffffffff80176566>] __sys_bpf+0xbd8/0x214e
[<ffffffff80177d14>] __riscv_sys_bpf+0x22/0x2a
[<ffffffff80d2493a>] do_trap_ecall_u+0x102/0x17c
[<ffffffff80d3048c>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x64
Fixes: 6082b6c328b5 ("bpf: Recognize addr_space_cast instruction in the verifier.")
Reported-by: xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>
Reported-by: yue sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABOYnLz09O1+2gGVJuCxd_24a-7UueXzV-Ff+Fr+h5EKFDiYCQ@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240322153518.11555-1-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The verifier currently converts addr_space_cast from as(1) to as(0) that
is: BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X with off=1 and imm=1
to
BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X with imm=1 (32-bit mov)
Because of this imm=1, the JITs that have bpf_jit_needs_zext() == true,
interpret the converted instruction as BPF_ZEXT_REG(DST) which is a
special form of mov32, used for doing explicit zero extension on dst.
These JITs will just zero extend the dst reg and will not move the src to
dst before the zext.
Fix do_misc_fixups() to set imm=0 when converting addr_space_cast to a
normal mov32.
The JITs that have bpf_jit_needs_zext() == true rely on the verifier to
emit zext instructions. Mark dst_reg as subreg when doing cast from
as(1) to as(0) so the verifier emits a zext instruction after the mov.
Fixes: 6082b6c328b5 ("bpf: Recognize addr_space_cast instruction in the verifier.")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240321153939.113996-1-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In case of GE/GT/SGE/JST instructions, regs_refine_cond_op()
reuses the logic that does analysis of LE/LT/SLE/SLT instructions.
This commit avoids the use of a goto to perform the reuse.
Signed-off-by: Harishankar Vishwanathan <harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240321002955.808604-1-harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com
