IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The value passed to ufs_inode_getblock() as the 3rd argument
had lower bits ignored; the upper bits were shifted down
and used and they actually make sense - those are _lower_ bits
of index in indirect block (i.e. they form the index within
a fragment within an indirect block).
Pass those as argument. Upper bits of index (i.e. the number
of fragment within indirect block) will join them shortly.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
These calling conventions are rudiments of pre-2.3 times; they
really need to be sanitized. This is the first step; next
will be _always_ returning a block number, instead of this
"return a pointer to buffer_head, except when we get to the
actual data" crap.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
... and massage ufs_frag_map() to take those instead of fragment number.
As it is, we duplicate the damn thing on the write side, open-coded and
bloody hard to follow.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
We are holding ->truncate_mutex, so nobody else can alter our
block pointers. Rechecks/retries were needed back when we
only held BKL there, and had to cope with write_begin/writepage
and writepage/truncate races. Can't happen anymore...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
There's a case when an indirect block gets dirtied for no good
reason - when there's a hole starting in the middle of area
covered by it and spanning past its end, and truncate() is done
precisely to the beginning of the hole.
The block is obviously not modified at all - all removals happen
beyond it. However, existing code ends up dirtying it just in
case. It's trivial to fix and while it's not a real bug by any
stretch of imagination, it makes the damn thing harder to follow.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Note that it's already made unreachable from the inode, so we don't have
to worry about ufs_frag_map() walking into something already freed.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Have caller fetch the block number *and* remove it from wherever
it was. Pass the block number instead.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
We always have 0 < depth2 <= depth in there, so
if (--depth) {
if (--depth2)
A
B
} else {
C // not using depth2
}
D // not using depth2
is equivalent to
if (--depth2)
A with s/depth/depth - 1/
if (--depth)
B
else
C
D
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
For calls in __ufs_truncate_blocks() it's just a matter of not
incrementing offsets[0] and not making that call - immediately
following loop will be executed one extra time and we'll be just
fine. For recursive call in ufs_trunc_branch() itself, just
assing NULL to offsets if we would be about to make such call.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Instead of manually checking that the array contains only zeroes,
find the position of the last non-zero (in __ufs_truncate(), where
we can conveniently do that) and use that to tell if there's
any non-zero in the array tail passed to ufs_trunc_...indirect().
The goal of all that clumsiness is to get fold these functions
together.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
rather than bitslicing the offset just formed as sum of shifted indices,
pass the array of those indices itself. NULL is used as equivalent
of "all zeroes" (== free the entire branch).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
IOW, the distance of cutoff from the begining of the branch
(in blocks).
That (and the fact that block just prior to cutoff is guaranteed to
be present) allows to tell whether to free triple indirect block
just by looking at the offset.
While we are at it, using u64 for index in the block is wrong -
those should be unsigned int.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Use ufs_block_to_path() to find the cutoff path in the block pointers' tree.
For now just use the information about the depth (to bypass the fully
preserved subtrees); subsequent commits will use the information about actual
path.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
type makes no sense - those are indices in block number arrays, not
block numbers. And no, UFS is not likely to grow indirect blocks with
4Gpointers in them...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
It is closely tied to block pointers handling there, can benefit
from existing helpers, etc. - no point keeping them apart.
Trimmed the trailing whitespaces in inode.c at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Currently - on lock_ufs(), eventually - on per-inode mutex.
lock_ufs() used to be mere BKL, which is much weaker, so it needed
those rechecks. BKL doesn't provide any exclusion once we lose CPU;
its blind replacement, OTOH, _does_. Making that per-filesystem was
an atrocity, but at least we can simplify life here. And yes, we
certainly need to make that sucker per-inode - these days inode.c and
truncate.c uses are needed only to protect the block pointers.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
There were 3 remaining users; in two of them we took ->s_lock immediately
after lock_ufs() and held it until just before unlock_ufs(); the third
one (statfs) could not be called from itself or from other two (remount
and sync_fs). Just use ->s_lock in statfs and don't bother with lock_ufs
at all.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
* stores to block pointers are under per-inode seqlock (meta_lock) and
mutex (truncate_mutex)
* fetches of block pointers are either under truncate_mutex, or wrapped
into seqretry loop on meta_lock
* all changes of ->i_size are under truncate_mutex and i_mutex
* all changes of ->i_lastfrag are under truncate_mutex
It's similar to what ext2 is doing; the main difference is that unlike
ext2 we can't rely upon the atomicity of stores into block pointers -
on UFS2 they are 64bit. So we can't cut the corner when switching
a pointer from NULL to non-NULL as we could in ext2_splice_branch()
and need to use meta_lock on all modifications.
We use seqlock where ext2 uses rwlock; ext2 could probably also benefit
from such change...
Another non-trivial difference is that with UFS we *cannot* have reader
grab truncate_mutex in case of race - it has to keep retrying. That
might be possible to change, but not until we lift tail unpacking
several levels up in call chain.
After that commit we do *NOT* hold fs-wide serialization on accesses
to block pointers anymore. Moreover, lock_ufs() can become a normal
mutex now - it's only used on statfs, remount and sync_fs and none
of those uses are recursive. As the matter of fact, *now* it can be
collapsed with ->s_lock, and be eventually replaced with saner
per-cylinder-group spinlocks, but that's a separate story.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
right now it doesn't matter (lock_ufs() serializes everything),
but when we switch to per-inode locking, it will be needed.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Broken in "[PATCH] ufs: truncate should allocate block for last byte";
all way back in 2006. ufs_setattr() hadn't been the only user of
vmtruncate() and eliminating ->truncate() method required corrections
in a bunch of places. Eventually those places had migrated into
->write_begin() failure exit and ->write_end() after short copy...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
a) move it inside ufs_truncate()
b) ufs_free_inode() doesn't need it - it's serialized on ->s_lock
c) ufs_write_inode() doesn't need it either (and can be called without
it anyway).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
A new intel_pmc_ipc driver, a symmetrical allocation and free fix in
dell-laptop, a couple minor fixes, and some updated documentation in the
dell-laptop comments.
intel_pmc_ipc:
- Add Intel Apollo Lake PMC IPC driver
tc1100-wmi:
- Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"
dell-laptop:
- Fix allocating & freeing SMI buffer page
- Show info about WiGig and UWB in debugfs
- Update information about wireless control
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJVmM8aAAoJEKbMaAwKp364iUkH/jihOduWkDTzzzxRP2Dv2nEh
qyvE94Nc9A9dl87C2+II/Pi1s8h4CJOQpl70syYYPc4FdF70hpvP8TbHkgCWrY/d
F8CoS9L9keviMtGOWlbEL9hBjfSDNwTMESTrDxrwhA04TSAwjDmXhhiUOF5FjFJm
CX5+ZQ3iXEH6KsENR+Er54J9+6WKE6IuRcnnKCapnPQ8cEYeVn+WEPyzHCOy8Pg3
xzzUar3/knS2VMIb5eIVpaKFvD9P9qBsC/gQ0pk1Y+686gwQZMVURDv8lw8hfXpx
TJDOXk21P8WbSH1r+jwax5wLjLge7vJtYG2Deye6MUgvSgg+O2tSVCv9SMQR088=
=WUgr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v4.2-2' of git://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86
Pull late x86 platform driver updates from Darren Hart:
"The following came in a bit later and I wanted them to bake in next a
few more days before submitting, thus the second pull.
A new intel_pmc_ipc driver, a symmetrical allocation and free fix in
dell-laptop, a couple minor fixes, and some updated documentation in
the dell-laptop comments.
intel_pmc_ipc:
- Add Intel Apollo Lake PMC IPC driver
tc1100-wmi:
- Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"
dell-laptop:
- Fix allocating & freeing SMI buffer page
- Show info about WiGig and UWB in debugfs
- Update information about wireless control"
* tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v4.2-2' of git://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86:
intel_pmc_ipc: Add Intel Apollo Lake PMC IPC driver
tc1100-wmi: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"
dell-laptop: Fix allocating & freeing SMI buffer page
dell-laptop: Show info about WiGig and UWB in debugfs
dell-laptop: Update information about wireless control
Pull more vfs updates from Al Viro:
"Assorted VFS fixes and related cleanups (IMO the most interesting in
that part are f_path-related things and Eric's descriptor-related
stuff). UFS regression fixes (it got broken last cycle). 9P fixes.
fs-cache series, DAX patches, Jan's file_remove_suid() work"
[ I'd say this is much more than "fixes and related cleanups". The
file_table locking rule change by Eric Dumazet is a rather big and
fundamental update even if the patch isn't huge. - Linus ]
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (49 commits)
9p: cope with bogus responses from server in p9_client_{read,write}
p9_client_write(): avoid double p9_free_req()
9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
dax: bdev_direct_access() may sleep
block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices
dax: Use copy_from_iter_nocache
dax: Add block size note to documentation
fs/file.c: __fget() and dup2() atomicity rules
fs/file.c: don't acquire files->file_lock in fd_install()
fs:super:get_anon_bdev: fix race condition could cause dev exceed its upper limitation
vfs: avoid creation of inode number 0 in get_next_ino
namei: make set_root_rcu() return void
make simple_positive() public
ufs: use dir_pages instead of ufs_dir_pages()
pagemap.h: move dir_pages() over there
remove the pointless include of lglock.h
fs: cleanup slight list_entry abuse
xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and file capabilities
fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate
fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything
...
Commit 835a6a2f86 ("Bluetooth: Stop sabotaging list poisoning")
thought that the code was sabotaging the list poisoning when NULL'ing
out the list pointers and removed it.
But what was going on was that the bluetooth code was using NULL
pointers for the list as a way to mark it empty, and that commit just
broke it (and replaced the test with NULL with a "list_empty()" test on
a uninitialized list instead, breaking things even further).
So fix it all up to use the regular and real list_empty() handling
(which does not use NULL, but a pointer to itself), also making sure to
initialize the list properly (the previous NULL case was initialized
implicitly by the session being allocated with kzalloc())
This is a combination of patches by Marcel Holtmann and Tedd Ho-Jeong
An.
[ I would normally expect to get this through the bt tree, but I'm going
to release -rc1, so I'm just committing this directly - Linus ]
Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Original-by: Tedd Ho-Jeong An <tedd.an@intel.com>
Original-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>:
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
