IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Some powernv machines use IGB for networking, so build the driver in to
enable net booting such machines.
Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230420052149.1328094-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Unlikely that anyone is still regularly using JFS, drop it from the
defconfig.
Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230420051609.1324201-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Rather than trying to keep multiple configs up to date, make
pseries_defconfig an alias for ppc64le_guest_defconfig.
NOTE, pseries_defconfig was a big endian config, but this commit
switches it to little endian.
Almost all distros are ppc64le these days, so little endian is much more
likely to be what a user wants when they build for "pseries".
For an actual big endian guest, use ppc64_guest_defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-32-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Rather than trying to keep multiple configs up to date, make
pseries_le_defconfig an alias for ppc64le_guest_defconfig.
ppc64le_guest_defconfig should work in all cases that
pseries_le_defconfig currently does, but if not we can update it.
Move pseries_le_defconfig down in the Makefile, so it appears after
ppc64le_guest_defconfig in the help output.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-31-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Incorporate the generic kvm_guest.config into the powerpc guest configs,
ppc64[le]_guest_defconfig.
This brings in some useful options, in particular 9P support, and also
means future additions to the generic file will be automatically picked
up by the powerpc configs.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-30-mpe@ellerman.id.au
These drivers are sometimes required to have functional networking in a
guest, so build them in when building ppc64[le]_guest_defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-29-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Fedora enables DEBUG_VM, which has led to occasions where a VM_BUG_ON()
is not caught by upstream testing, but rather is first found in Fedora,
which is not how it's meant to be.
PAGE_OWNER & PAGE_POISONING both need to be enabled on the kernel
command line, so should not add much overhead in normal operation.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-20-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Traditionally on powerpc servers PREEMPT_NONE was used, but these days
multiple distros are building with PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY - Ubuntu, Fedora &
CentOS all enable it.
So update the upstream config to reflect that, and get test coverage
before code hits the distros.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-8-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Tell the generic BPF code that the JIT should be enabled by default,
rather than the interpreter. Most distros use CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y
anyway, so this just updates upstream to more closely match that.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-7-mpe@ellerman.id.au
SPLPAR is default y since commit 20c0e8269e9d ("powerpc/pseries:
Implement paravirt qspinlocks for SPLPAR"), so doesn't need to be in the
defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230414132415.821564-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Currently none of the generated defconfigs appear in the help output,
because the help text discovers defconfigs by looking for actual files
named "*_defconfig".
Collect the generated defconfig names into a variable and then print
those out in archhelp.
Output looks like eg:
pseries_le_defconfig - Build for pseries_le
ppc64le_defconfig - Build for ppc64le
ppc64le_guest_defconfig - Build for ppc64le_guest
...
ppc64_randconfig - Build for ppc64_randconfig
adder875_defconfig - Build for adder875
amigaone_defconfig - Build for amigaone
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
[mpe: Fix PHONY bug which broke in-tree build, thanks rmclure]
Link: https://msgid.link/20230329072334.2023357-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au
It's not necessary to prefix every command in archhelp with "@" (to
suppress echoing the command), because that is done by the top level
Makefile when it evaluates archhelp.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230329072334.2023357-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Code in the idle path is not allowed to be instrumented because RCU is
disabled, see commit 0e985e9d2286 ("cpuidle: Add comments about
noinstr/__cpuidle usage").
Force inlining of the inline functions called from cpuidle, to ensure
they are not emitted out-of-line and then available for tracing.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230406144535.3786008-4-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Since commit a01353cf1896 ("cpuidle: Fix ct_idle_*() usage"), the
cpuidle entry code calls trace_hardirqs_on() (actually
trace_hardirqs_on_prepare()) in ct_cpuidle_enter() before calling into
the cpuidle driver.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230406144535.3786008-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Code in the idle path is not allowed to be instrumented because RCU is
disabled, see commit 0e985e9d2286 ("cpuidle: Add comments about
noinstr/__cpuidle usage").
Mark prep_irq_for_idle() __cpuidle, which is equivalent to noinstr, to
enforce that.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230406144535.3786008-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
Add PPC_QEMU_E500 to corenet_base.config, which is then used to generate
corenet64_smp_defconfig and corenet32_smp_defconfig.
That then allows both those configs to build kernels that boot in qemu
using the ppce500 machine type and respectively -cpu e5500 or -cpu
e500mc.
The code that is added by PPC_QEMU_E500 just defines another machine
with a probe function that recognises qemu, so there should be no change
when booting on actual hardware supported by CORENET_GENERIC.
The increase in vmlinux size is less than 1KB.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230411102838.512859-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
With the two platforms depending on this shared code, and no others,
we can remove the orphaned code and Kconfigs
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-4-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Based on documentation revision dates, this MPC82xx pq2fads system
predates the MPC8272-ADS variant by about a year and only has 1/2
the amount of RAM (32MB) -- largely making it useless with a modern
v6.x kernel from today.
Similar to the MPC8272-ADS the pq2fads also supported other 82xx CPU
variants, had 8MB flash, and like the 8272 ADS platform, was on a fairly
large PCB in order to have space for breakout connectors for all features.
These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for a
small group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEM
board designs. Given that, it makes sense to remove support today.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
The MPC8272-ADS also supported other 82xx CPU variants, had 64MB RAM,
8MB flash, and like the 85xx ADS platforms, was on a fairly large PCB
in order to have space for breakout connectors for all the features.
These 82xx platforms are two decades old, and originally made for a
small group of industry related people in order to assist in new OEM
board designs. Given that, it makes sense to remove support today.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230224204959.17425-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
This evaluation platform was essentially a single core 8641 with
integrated graphics/display support - in an effort to reduce chip count
on kiosk and similar applications.
Compared to other evaluation platforms considered for removal in other
recent commits, this platform was relatively rare. Unlike all the other
10+ platforms, I couldn't find any documentation on it - just a link to
downloading the 2007 era BSP in "LTIB" format as was done back then.
With all that in mind, it seems prudent to remove it here in 2023.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
[mpe: Drop stale reference to MPC8610_HPCD in 86xx/Kconfig]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-4-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
There is no denying that this was an interesting platform in its day.
Access to a SMP powerpc platform became a bit more obtainable for folks
in the BSP industry in the 2007 era, thanks to this platform.
Add to that the move to the black Antec case vs. the generic white 2005
era case of the MPC8548CDS or the retro 1950s 1/2 height horizontal case
of the HPC II, and it was pretty interesting to people like myself then.
However, like all the other evaluation platforms, the overall system
was complex out of necessity, as it tried to showcase all possible
features and use-cases. That included an AMP option, where you could run
two bootloaders and two kernels over two serial consoles. Peripheral
sharing got a bit more tricky when you got to the hard disk and similar.
In any case we still have the same circumstance. A relatively rare and
expensive evaluation platform that is now 15+ years old and not out there
in large numbers in the general public. Removal in 2023 just makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-3-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
This was an interesting platform - it was the 1st instance of a
respin of earlier 130nm 74xx CPUs on 90nm and systems using MPC7448
were positioned as a rack server platform solution.
Given that, the evaluation platform (at least the one I had) was shipped
in a horizontal 1/2 height Antec desktop case with retro styling and
colours, despite the fact the docs explicitly stated that the HPC II is
not a desktop machine (noting it had no gfx or legacy PC I/O support).
Historic trivia aside, this was the 1st introduction of the e600
procfam as an evolution from the earlier G4.
However even with the claim to being "1st e600" it seems the 2005+
era was turning its attention to multicore support and from my memory
this poor guy was quickly overshadowed by the dual core MPC8641D.
All that aside, we are once again looking at 15+ year old evaluation
platforms that were not widely distributed, so 2023 removal makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230225201318.3682-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
This final variant in the e300 family of Modular Development System
(MDS) in this series was actually aimed at feature reduction - things
like floating point and ethernet were removed in order to make for a
lower power and lower cost system.
Like all the MDS systems, it was meant as a vehicle to get the CPU out
early to hardware OEMs so software and board development could take place
in parallel.
These were made in limited numbers and availability preference was given
to partners who were planning to make their own boards.
Given that the whole reason for existence was to assist in enabling new
board designs [not happening for 10+ years], and that they weren't
generally available, and that the hardware wasn't really hobbyist friendly
even for retro computing, it makes sense to retire the support for this
particular platform.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
[mpe: Drop stale reference to MPC832x_MDS in arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230220115913.25811-5-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
