IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The iterator counting assumed we're doing an obvious optimization when
only updating the refcount on indirect extents - but we're not doing it
yet.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This make the disk accounting code saner, and it's not clear why we'd
ever want the same data to be in multiple stripes simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This fixes a bug in io.c bch2_write_index_default() - it was missing the
traverse call, but bch2_extent_atomic_end returns an error now and can
just call it itself.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
In order to avoid trying to allocate too many btree iterators,
bch2_extent_atomic_end() needs to count how many iterators are going to
be needed for insertions and overwrites - but we weren't counting the
iterators for deleting a reflink_v when the refcount goes to 0.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Call bch2_btree_iter_verify from bch2_btree_node_iter_fix(); also verify
in btree_iter_peek_uptodate() that iter->k matches what's in the btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Any time we're modifying what's in the btree, iterators potentially have
to be updated - this one was exposed by the reflink code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
.key_debugcheck no longer needs to take a pointer to the btree node
Also, try to make sure wherever we're inserting or modifying keys in the
btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With multiple iterators, if another iterator points to the key being
modified, we need to call bch2_btree_node_iter_fix() to re-unpack the
key into the iter->k
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Also, move other update path checks to where they actually check all the
updates (after triggers have run)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We have to reinitialize ptrs whenever we do something that changes them.
Regression from when the code was converted to be generic across all
keys with pointers.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_bkey_normalize() modifies the value, and we were modifying the
original value in the src btree node - but, we're called without a write
lock held on the src node. Oops...
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With reflink, various code now has to handle both KEY_TYPE_extent
or KEY_TYPE_reflink_v - so, convert it to be generic across all keys
with pointers.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
this lets us get rid of a lot of extra switch statements - in a lot of
places we dispatch on the btree node type, and then the key type, so
this is a nice cleanup across a lot of code.
Also improve the on disk format versioning stuff.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Hit an assertion, probably spurious, indicating an iterator was unlocked
when it shouldn't have been (spurious because it wasn't locked at all
when the caller called btree_insert_at()).
Add a flag, BTREE_ITER_NOUNLOCK, and tighten up the assertions
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
