IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
There are couple of places where INTA interrupt controller
lacks #interrupt-cells property. This leads to warnings of
the type:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi:147.51-156.5: Warning (interrupt_provider): /bus@100000/main-navss/interrupt-controller@33d00000: Missing #interrupt-cells in interrupt provider
when building TI device-tree files with W=2 warning level.
Fix these.
Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201127210128.9151-1-nsekhar@ti.com
Add the sub-mailbox nodes that are used to communicate between MPU and
various remote processors present in the J7200 SoCs to the J7200 common
processor board. These include the R5F remote processors in the dual-R5F
clusters in the MCU domain (MCU_R5FSS0) and the MAIN domain (MAIN_R5FSS0).
These sub-mailbox nodes utilize the System Mailbox clusters 0 and 1. All
the remaining mailbox clusters are currently not used on A72 core, and
so are disabled. The nodes are added in the k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi file
to co-locate these alongside future reserved-memory nodes required for
remoteprocs.
The sub-mailbox nodes added match the hard-coded mailbox configuration
used within the TI RTOS IPC software packages. A sub-mailbox node is added
for each of the R5F cores to accommodate the R5F processor sub-systems
running in Split mode. Only the sub-mailbox node for the first R5F core in
each cluster is used in case of Lockstep mode for that R5F cluster.
NOTE:
The GIC_SPI interrupts to be used are dynamically allocated and managed
by the System Firmware through the ti-sci-intr irqchip driver. So, only
valid interrupts that are used by the sub-mailbox devices (each cluster's
User 0 IRQ output) are enabled. This is done to minimize the number of
NavSS Interrupt Router outputs utilized.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026232637.15681-4-s-anna@ti.com
The J7200 Main NavSS block contains a Mailbox IP instance with
multiple clusters, and follows the same integration style as on
J721E SoCs.
Add all the Mailbox clusters as their own nodes under the MAIN
NavSS interconnect node instead of creating an almost empty parent
node for the new K3 mailbox IP and the clusters as its child nodes.
All these nodes are enabled by default in the base dtsi file, but
any cluster that does not define any child sub-mailbox nodes
should be disabled in the corresponding board dts files.
NOTE:
The NavSS only has a limited number of interrupts, so none of the
interrupts generated by a Mailbox IP are added by default. Only
the needed interrupts that are targeted towards the A72 GIC will
have to be added later on in the board dts files alongside the
corresponding sub-mailbox child nodes.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026232637.15681-3-s-anna@ti.com
The Main NavSS block on J7200 SoCs contains a HwSpinlock IP instance that
is same as the IP on AM65x and J721E SoCs. Add the DT node for this on
J7200 SoCs. The node is present within the Main NavSS block, and is added
as a child node under the main_navss interconnect node.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026232637.15681-2-s-anna@ti.com
The device tree standard states that when the status property is
not present under a node, the okay value is assumed. There are many
reasons for doing the same, the number of strings in the device
tree, default power management functionality, etc. are a few of the
reasons.
In general, after a few rounds of discussions [1] there are few
options one could take when dealing with SoC dtsi and board dts
a. SoC dtsi provide nodes as a super-set default (aka enabled) state and
to prevent messy board files, when more boards are added per SoC, we
optimize and disable commonly un-used nodes in board-common.dtsi
b. SoC dtsi disables all hardware dependent nodes by default and board
dts files enable nodes based on a need basis.
c. Subjectively pick and choose which nodes we will disable by default
in SoC dtsi and over the years we can optimize things and change
default state depending on the need.
While there are pros and cons on each of these approaches, the right
thing to do will be to stick with device tree default standards and
work within those established rules. So, we choose to go with option
(a).
Lets cleanup defaults of j721e SoC dtsi before this gets more harder
to cleanup later on and new SoCs are added.
The only functional difference between the dtb generated is
status='okay' is no longer necessary for mcasp10 and depends on the
default state.
NOTE: There is a known risk of omission that new board dts developers
might miss reviewing both the board schematics in addition to all the
DT nodes of the SoC when setting appropriate nodes status to disable
or reserved in the board dts. This can expose issues in drivers that
may not anticipate an incomplete node (example: missing appropriate
board properties) being in an "okay" state. These cases are considered
bugs and need to be fixed in the drivers as and when identified.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201027130701.GE5639@atomide.com/
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113211826.13087-3-nm@ti.com
The device tree standard states that when the status property is
not present under a node, the okay value is assumed. There are many
reasons for doing the same, the number of strings in the device
tree, default power management functionality, etc. are a few of the
reasons.
In general, after a few rounds of discussions [1] there are few
options one could take when dealing with SoC dtsi and board dts
a. SoC dtsi provide nodes as a super-set default (aka enabled) state and
to prevent messy board files, when more boards are added per SoC, we
optimize and disable commonly un-used nodes in board-common.dtsi
b. SoC dtsi disables all hardware dependent nodes by default and board
dts files enable nodes based on a need basis.
c. Subjectively pick and choose which nodes we will disable by default
in SoC dtsi and over the years we can optimize things and change
default state depending on the need.
While there are pros and cons on each of these approaches, the right
thing to do will be to stick with device tree default standards and
work within those established rules. So, we choose to go with option
(a).
Lets cleanup defaults of am654 SoC dtsi before this gets more harder
to cleanup later on and new SoCs are added.
The dtb generated is identical with the patch and it is just cleanup to
ensure we have a clean usage model
NOTE: There is a known risk of omission that new board dts developers
might miss reviewing both the board schematics in addition to all the
DT nodes of the SoC when setting appropriate nodes status to disable
or reserved in the board dts. This can expose issues in drivers that
may not anticipate an incomplete node (example: missing appropriate
board properties) being in an "okay" state. These cases are considered
bugs and need to be fixed in the drivers as and when identified.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201027130701.GE5639@atomide.com/
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113211826.13087-2-nm@ti.com
Two carveout reserved memory nodes each have been added for each of the
R5F remote processor devices within both the MCU and MAIN domains for the
TI J721E EVM boards. These nodes are assigned to the respective rproc
device nodes as well. The first region will be used as the DMA pool for
the rproc device, and the second region will furnish the static carveout
regions for the firmware memory.
The current carveout addresses and sizes are defined statically for each
device. The R5F processors do not have an MMU, and as such require the
exact memory used by the firmwares to be set-aside. The firmware images
do not require any RSC_CARVEOUT entries in their resource tables either
to allocate the memory for firmware memory segments.
Note that the R5F1 carveouts are needed only if the R5F cluster is running
in Split (non-LockStep) mode. The reserved memory nodes can be disabled
later on if there is no use-case defined to use the corresponding
remote processor.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-9-s-anna@ti.com
Add the required 'mboxes' property to all the R5F processors for the
TI J721E common processor board. The mailboxes and some shared memory
are required for running the Remote Processor Messaging (RPMsg) stack
between the host processor and each of the R5Fs. The nodes are therefore
added in the common k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file so that all of these can
be co-located.
The chosen sub-mailboxes match the values used in the current firmware
images. This can be changed, if needed, as per the system integration
needs after making appropriate changes on the firmware side as well.
Note that any R5F Core1 resources are needed and used only when that
R5F cluster is configured for Split-mode.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-8-s-anna@ti.com
The J721E SoCs have 3 dual-core Arm Cortex-R5F processor (R5FSS)
subsystems/clusters. One R5F cluster (MCU_R5FSS0) is present within
the MCU domain, and the remaining two clusters are present in the
MAIN domain (MAIN_R5FSS0 & MAIN_R5FSS1). Each of these can be
configured at boot time to be either run in a LockStep mode or in
an Asymmetric Multi Processing (AMP) fashion in Split-mode. These
subsystems have 64 KB each Tightly-Coupled Memory (TCM) internal
memories for each core split between two banks - ATCM and BTCM
(further interleaved into two banks). There are some IP integration
differences from standard Arm R5 clusters such as the absence of
an ACP port, presence of an additional TI-specific Region Address
Translater (RAT) module for translating 32-bit CPU addresses into
larger system bus addresses etc.
Add the DT nodes for these two MAIN domain R5F cluster/subsystems,
the two R5F cores are each added as child nodes to the corresponding
main cluster node. Both the clusters are configured to run in LockStep
mode by default, with the ATCMs enabled to allow the R5 cores to execute
code from DDR with boot-strapping code from ATCM. The inter-processor
communication between the main A72 cores and these processors is
achieved through shared memory and Mailboxes.
The following firmware names are used by default for these cores, and
can be overridden in a board dts file if needed:
MAIN R5FSS0 Core0: j7-main-r5f0_0-fw (both in LockStep and Split modes)
MAIN R5FSS0 Core1: j7-main-r5f0_1-fw (needed only in Split mode)
MAIN R5FSS1 Core0: j7-main-r5f1_0-fw (both in LockStep and Split modes)
MAIN R5FSS1 Core1: j7-main-r5f1_1-fw (needed only in Split mode)
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-7-s-anna@ti.com
The J721E SoCs have 3 dual-core Arm Cortex-R5F processor (R5FSS)
subsystems/clusters. One R5F cluster (MCU_R5FSS0) is present within
the MCU domain, and the remaining two clusters are present in the
MAIN domain (MAIN_R5FSS0 & MAIN_R5FSS1). Each of these can be
configured at boot time to be either run in a LockStep mode or in
an Asymmetric Multi Processing (AMP) fashion in Split-mode. These
subsystems have 64 KB each Tightly-Coupled Memory (TCM) internal
memories for each core split between two banks - ATCM and BTCM
(further interleaved into two banks). There are some IP integration
differences from standard Arm R5 clusters such as the absence of
an ACP port, presence of an additional TI-specific Region Address
Translater (RAT) module for translating 32-bit CPU addresses into
larger system bus addresses etc.
Add the DT node for the MCU domain R5F cluster/subsystem, the two
R5F cores are added as child nodes to the main cluster/subsystem node.
The cluster is configured to run in LockStep mode by default, with the
ATCMs enabled to allow the R5 cores to execute code from DDR with
boot-strapping code from ATCM. The inter-processor communication
between the main A72 cores and these processors is achieved through
shared memory and Mailboxes.
The following firmware names are used by default for these cores, and
can be overridden in a board dts file if needed:
MCU R5FSS0 Core0: j7-mcu-r5f0_0-fw (both in LockStep and Split modes)
MCU R5FSS0 Core1: j7-mcu-r5f0_1-fw (needed only in Split mode)
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-6-s-anna@ti.com
Add a reserved memory node to reserve a portion of the DDR memory to be
used for performing inter-processor communication between all the MCU R5F
remote processors running RTOS on all the TI AM654 boards. This memory
shall be exercised only if the MCU R5FSS cluster is configured for Split
mode. A single 1 MB of memory at 0xa2000000 is reserved for this purpose,
and this accounts for all the vrings and vring buffers between pair of
these R5F remote processors.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-5-s-anna@ti.com
The R5F processors do not have an MMU, and as such require the exact memory
used by the firmwares to be set-aside. Four carveout reserved memory nodes
have been added with two each (1 MB and 15 MB in size) used for each of the
MCU R5F remote processor devices on all the TI K3 AM65x boards. These nodes
are assigned to the respective rproc device nodes as well.
The current carveout addresses and sizes are defined statically for each
device. The first region will be used as the DMA pool for the rproc
device, and the second region will furnish the static carveout regions
for the firmware memory.
Note that the R5F1 carveouts are needed only if the corresponding R5F
cluster is running in Split (non-LockStep) mode. The corresponding
reserved memory nodes can be disabled later on if there is no use-case
defined to use the corresponding remote processor.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-4-s-anna@ti.com
Add the required 'mboxes' property to both the R5F processors on all the
TI K3 AM65x boards. The mailboxes and some shared memory are required
for running the Remote Processor Messaging (RPMsg) stack between the
host processor and each of the R5Fs. The chosen sub-mailboxes match the
values used in the current firmware images. This can be changed, if
needed, as per the system integration needs after making appropriate
changes on the firmware side as well.
Note that the R5F Core1 resources are needed and used only when the
R5F cluster is configured for Split-mode.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-3-s-anna@ti.com
The AM65x SoCs have a single dual-core Arm Cortex-R5F processor (R5FSS)
subsystem/cluster. This R5F cluster (MCU_R5FSS0) is present within the
MCU domain, and can be configured at boot time to be either run in a
LockStep mode or in an Asymmetric Multi Processing (AMP) fashion in
Split-mode. This subsystem has 64 KB each Tightly-Coupled Memory (TCM)
internal memories for each core split between two banks - TCMA and TCMB
(further interleaved into two banks). There are some IP integration
differences from standard Arm R5F clusters such as the absence of an ACP
port, presence of an additional TI-specific Region Address Translater
(RAT) module for translating 32-bit CPU addresses into larger system
bus addresses etc.
Add the DT node for this R5F cluster/subsystem, the two R5F cores are
added as child nodes to the main cluster node. The cluster is configured
to run in LockStep mode by default, with the ATCMs enabled to allow the
R5 cores to execute code from DDR with boot-strapping code from ATCM.
The inter-processor communication between the main A53 cores and these
processors is achieved through shared memory and Mailboxes.
The following firmware names are used by default for these cores, and
can be overridden in a board dts file if needed:
am65x-mcu-r5f0_0-fw (LockStep mode and for Core0 in Split mode)
am65x-mcu-r5f0_1-fw (Core1 in Split mode)
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029033802.15366-2-s-anna@ti.com
The board uses lane 3 of SERDES for USB. Set the mux
accordingly.
The USB controller and EVM supports super-speed for USB0
on the Type-C port. However, the SERDES has a limitation
that upto 2 protocols can be used at a time. The SERDES is
wired for PCIe, QSGMII and USB super-speed. It has been
chosen to use PCI2 and QSGMII as default. So restrict
USB0 to high-speed mode.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200930122032.23481-7-rogerq@ti.com
First two lanes of SERDES is connected to PCIe, third lane is
connected to QSGMII and the last lane is connected to USB. However,
Cadence torrent SERDES doesn't support more than 2 protocols
at the same time. Configure it only for PCIe and QSGMII.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200930122032.23481-6-rogerq@ti.com
J7200 SoM has a HyperFlash connected to HyperBus memory controller. But
HyperBus is muxed with OSPI, therefore keep HyperBus node disabled.
Bootloader will detect the mux and enable the node as required.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200923163150.16973-3-vigneshr@ti.com
Add support for J7200 Common Processor Board.
The EVM architecture is very similar to J721E as follows:
+------------------------------------------------------+
| +-------------------------------------------+ |
| | | |
| | Add-on Card 1 Options | |
| | | |
| +-------------------------------------------+ |
| |
| |
| +-------------------+ |
| | | |
| | SOM | |
| +--------------+ | | |
| | | | | |
| | Add-on | +-------------------+ |
| | Card 2 | | Power Supply
| | Options | | |
| | | | |
| +--------------+ | <---
+------------------------------------------------------+
Common Processor Board
Common Processor board is the baseboard that has most of the actual
connectors, power supply etc. A SOM (System on Module) is plugged on
to the common processor board and this contains the SoC, PMIC, DDR and
basic high speed components necessary for functionality.
Note:
* The minimum configuration required to boot up the board is System On
Module(SOM) + Common Processor Board.
* Since there is just a single SOM and Common Processor Board, we are
maintaining common processor board as the base dts and SOM as the dtsi
that we include. In the future as more SOM's appear, we should move
common processor board as a dtsi and include configurations as dts.
* All daughter cards beyond the basic boards shall be maintained as
overlays.
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914162231.2535-6-lokeshvutla@ti.com
The J7200 SoC is a part of the K3 Multicore SoC architecture platform.
It is targeted for automotive gateway, vehicle compute systems,
Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) applications.
The SoC aims to meet the complex processing needs of modern embedded
products.
Some highlights of this SoC are:
* Dual Cortex-A72s in a single cluster, two clusters of lockstep
capable dual Cortex-R5F MCUs and a Centralized Device Management and
Security Controller (DMSC).
* Configurable L3 Cache and IO-coherent architecture with high data
throughput capable distributed DMA architecture under NAVSS.
* Integrated Ethernet switch supporting up to a total of 4 external ports
in addition to legacy Ethernet switch of up to 2 ports.
* Upto 1 PCIe-GEN3 controller, 1 USB3.0 Dual-role device subsystems,
20 MCANs, 3 McASP, eMMC and SD, OSPI/HyperBus memory controller, I3C
and I2C, eCAP/eQEP, eHRPWM among other peripherals.
* One hardware accelerator block containing AES/DES/SHA/MD5 called SA2UL
management.
See J7200 Technical Reference Manual (SPRUIU1, June 2020)
for further details: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruiu1
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914162231.2535-5-lokeshvutla@ti.com
Add PCIe device tree nodes (both RC and EP) for the four
PCIe instances here.
Also add the missing translations required in the "ranges"
DT property of cbass_main to access all the four PCIe
instances.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914152115.1788-2-kishon@ti.com
We intend to use one header file for SERDES MUX for all
TI SoCs so rename the header file.
The exsting macros are too generic. Prefix them with SoC name.
While at that, add the missing configurations for completeness.
Fixes: b766e3b0d5 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add system controller node and SERDES lane mux")
Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200918165930.2031-1-rogerq@ti.com
