IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
CT event handler is called under the gt->irq_lock from the interrupt
handling paths so make it the same from the init path. I don't think this
mismatch caused any functional issue but we need to wean the code of the
global i915->irq_lock.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201120095636.1987395-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Guc->mmio_msg is set under the guc->irq_lock in guc_get_mmio_msg so it
should be consumed under the same lock from guc_handle_mmio_msg.
I am not sure if the overall flow here makes complete sense but at least
the correct lock is now used.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201120095636.1987395-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
The GuC communication enabled/disabled messages are too noisy in info
level. Convert them from info to debug level, and switch to device based
logging while at it.
Reported-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200917165056.29766-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Firmware "Selected" state is a transient state - we don't expect to see
it after finishing driver probe, we even have asserts sprinkled over
i915 to confirm whether that's the case.
Unfortunately - we don't handle the transition out of "Selected" in case
of GuC fetch error, leading those asserts to fire when calling
"intel_huc_is_used()".
v2: Add dbg print when moving HuC into error state (Daniele)
Reported-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708100843.297655-2-michal@hardline.pl
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
We need to keep the GuC error logs around to debug the load failure,
so we can't clean them in the error unwind, which includes uc_fini().
Moving the cleanup to driver remove ensures that the logs stick around
long enough for us to dump them.
v2: reword commit msg (John)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We are quite trigger happy in cleaning up the firmware blobs, as we do
so from several error/fini paths in GuC/HuC/uC code. We do have the
__uc_cleanup_firmwares cleanup function, which unwinds
__uc_fetch_firmwares and is already called both from the error path of
gem_init and from gem_driver_release, so let's stop cleaning up from
all the other paths.
The fact that we're not cleaning the firmware immediately means that
we can't consider firmware availability as an indication of
initialization success. A "LOADABLE" status has been added to
indicate that the initialization was successful, to be used to
selectively load HuC only if HuC init has completed (HuC init failure
is not considered a fatal error).
v2: s/ready_to_load/loadable (Michal), only run guc/huc_fini if the
fw is in loadable state
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Now that we can differentiate wants vs uses GuC/HuC, intel_uc_init is
restricted to running only if we have successfully fetched the required
blob(s) and are committed to using the microcontroller(s).
The only remaining thing that can go wrong in uc_init is the allocation
of GuC/HuC related objects; if we get such a failure better to bail out
immediately instead of wedging later, like we do for e.g.
intel_engines_init, since without objects we can't use the HW, including
not being able to attempt the firmware load.
While at it, remove the unneeded fw_cleanup call (this is handled
outside of gt_init) and add a probe failure injection point for testing.
Also, update the logs for <g/h>uc_init failures to probe_failure() since
they will cause the driver load to fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
To be able to differentiate the before and after of our commitment to
GuC submission, which will be used in follow-up patches to early set-up
the submission structures.
v2: move functions to guc_submission.h (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need
to commit to using GuC as soon as possible.
Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the
microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fundamental
error (e.g. OOM); given that if we hit such an error we can't really
fall-back to anything, we can "officialize" the FW fetching completion
as the moment at which we're committing to using GuC.
To better differentiate this case, the uses_guc check, which indicates
that GuC is supported and was selected in modparam, is renamed to
wants_guc and a new uses_guc is introduced to represent the case were
we're committed to using the GuC. Note that uses_guc does still not imply
that the blob is actually loaded on the HW (is_running is the check for
that). Also, since we need to have attempted the fetch for the result
of uses_guc to be meaningful, we need to make sure we've moved away
from INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED.
All the GuC changes have been mirrored on the HuC for coherency.
v2: split fetch return changes and new macros to their own patches,
support HuC only if GuC is wanted, improve "used" state
description (Michal)
v3: s/wants_huc/uses_huc in uc_init_wopcm
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We already have guc_is_running function, but it only reflects
firmware status, while to fully use GuC we need to know if we've
already established communication with it.
v2: also s/intel_guc_is_running/intel_guc_is_fw_running (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200131153706.109528-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
uC sanitization is only meaningful if we are running with uC present
or enabled. Make this function part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
uC preparation and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Firmware fetching and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Instead of spreading multiple conditionals across the uC code
to find out current mode of uC operation, start using predefined
set of function pointers that reflect that mode.
Begin with pair of init_hw/fini_hw functions that are responsible
for uC hardware initialization and cleanup.
v2: drop ops_none, use macro to generate ops helpers
v3: reuse __uc_check_hw to avoid redundant comment
v4: forward declare ops struct vs functions
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Begin pulling the GT setup underneath a single GT umbrella; let intel_gt
take ownership of its engines! As hinted, the complication is the
lifetime of the probed engine versus the active lifetime of the GT
backends. We need to detect the engine layout early and keep it until
the end so that we can sanitize state on takeover and release.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222120752.1368352-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since we started using CT buffers on all gens, the function pointers can
only be set to either the _nop() or the _ct() functions. Since the
_nop() case applies to when the CT are disabled, we can just handle that
case in the _ct() functions and call them directly.
v2: keep intel_guc_send() and make the CT send/receive functions work on
intel_guc_ct. (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The only difference from the GuC POV between guc_communication_stop and
guc_communication_disable is that the former can be called after GuC
has been reset. Instead of having two separate paths, we can just skip
the call into GuC in the disabling path and re-use that.
Note that by using the disable() path instead of the stop() one there
are two additional changes in SW side for the stop path:
- interrupts are now disabled before disabling the CT, which is ok
because we do not want interrupts with CT disabled;
- guc_get_mmio_msg() is called in the stop case as well, which is ok
because if there are errors before the reset we do want to record
them.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
There is no need to pass explicit i915 since we already have
a debug trick to get parent gt from uc_fw, we only need to
make this trick available on non-debug builds.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191211124549.59516-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Instead of relying on the workqueue, the upcoming reworked GuC
submission flow will offer the host driver indipendent control over
the execution status of each context submitted to GuC. As part of this,
the doorbell usage model has been reworked, with each doorbell being
paired to a single lrc and a doorbell ring representing new work
available for that specific context. This mechanism, however, limits
the number of contexts that can be registered with GuC to the number of
doorbells, which is an undesired limitation. To avoid this limitation,
we requested the GuC team to also provide a H2G that will allow the host
to notify the GuC of work available for a specified lrc, so we can use
that mechanism instead of relying on the doorbells. We can therefore drop
the doorbell code we currently have, also given the fact that in the
unlikely case we'd want to switch back to using doorbells we'd have to
heavily rework it.
The workqueue will still have a use in the new interface to pass special
commands, so that code has been retained for now.
With the doorbells gone and the GuC client becoming even simpler, the
existing GuC selftests don't give us any meaningful coverage so we can
remove them as well. Some selftests might come with the new code, but
they will look different from what we have now so if doesn't seem worth
it to keep the file around in the meantime.
v2: fix comments and commit message (John)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Commit 50d84418f586 ("drm/i915: Add i915 to i915_inject_probe_failure")
introduced new functions unfortunately named incompatibly with rules
established by commit f2db53f14d3d ("drm/i915: Replace "_load" with
"_probe" consequently"). Fix it for consistency.
Suggested-by: Michał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191029102036.6326-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
Avoid going to the base i915 device when we already have a path from gt
to the runtime powermanagement interface. The benefit is that it looks a
bit more self-consistent to always be acquiring the gt->uncore->rpm for
use with the gt->uncore.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191007154531.1750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
During normal driver unload we attempt to disable GuC communication
while it is currently stopped. This results in a nop'd call to
intel_guc_ct_disable within guc_disable_communication because
stop/disable rely on the same flag to prevent further comms with CT.
We can avoid the call to disable and still leave communication in a
satisfactory state by extracting a set of shared steps from stop/disable.
This set can include guc_disable_interrupts as we do not require the
single caller of guc_stop_communication to be atomic:
"drm/i915/selftests: Fixup atomic reset checking".
This situation (stop -> disable) only occurs during intel_uc_fini_hw,
so during fini, call guc_disable_communication only if currently enabled.
The symmetric calls to enable/disable remain unmodified for all other
scenarios.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110943
Signed-off-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190829174154.14675-1-fernando.pacheco@intel.com
There is no need to mark whole GPU as wedged just because
of the custom HuC fw failure as users can always verify
actual HuC firmware status using existing HUC_STATUS ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190818095204.31568-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
If we failed to fetch default GuC firmware and we didn't plan
to use it for the submission and we never have used GuC before
then we may continue normal driver load, no need to declare
GPU wedged (we can use execlist for submission) and it is safe
to run without the HuC (users will check HuC status anyway).
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190818095204.31568-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Let's wait with decision about importance of uC failure to
hardware initialization step.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Be consistent and always perform fw fetch cleanup in GuC/HuC specific
init functions on every failure. Also while converting firmware
status to error, stop treating SELECTED as non-error, as long term
we should not see it.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We really need to have separate NOT_SUPPORTED state (for
lack of hardware support) and DISABLED state (to indicate
user decision) as we will have to take special steps even
if GuC firmware is now disabled but hardware exists and
could have been previously used.
v2: fix logic (Chris/CI)
v3: use proper check to avoid probe failure (CI)
v4: explain status transitions (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816205658.15020-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Since commit 6ca9a2beb54a ("drm/i915: Unwind i915_gem_init() failure")
we believed that we correctly handle all errors encountered during
GuC initialization, including special one that indicates request to
run driver with disabled GPU submission (-EIO).
Unfortunately since commit 121981fafe69 ("drm/i915/guc: Combine
enable_guc_loading|submission modparams") we stopped using that
error code to avoid unwanted fallback to execlist submission mode.
In result any GuC initialization failure was treated as non-recoverable
error leading to driver load abort, so we could not even read related
GuC error log to investigate cause of the problem.
For now always return -EIO on any uC hardware related failure.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190811195132.9660-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
After successful uC initialization we are reporting GuC
firmware version and status of GuC submission and HuC.
Add HuC fw version to this report to make it complete,
but also skip all HuC info if HuC is not supported.
v2: squeeze to one line (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812073949.24076-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We don't want to rely on misleading WOPCM partitioning error.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190811195132.9660-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
WOPCM programming error might be due to inserted earlier probe
failure that could affects HuC firmware loading and thus impacts
result of WOPCM partitioning that would be now incompatible with
previously programmed values.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190807170034.8440-7-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
When we failed to fetch GuC firmware there is no point in fetching
HuC firmware as we will not be able to use it without working GuC.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190807170034.8440-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
While modparams are global for the i915 module, we are reporting
status of the params applied against specific device instance.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190807170034.8440-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Since commit 301efe96f777 ("drm/i915/uc: Don't fail on HuC
firmware failure") we can continue driver load after error
during HuC firmware load or authentication, but we could
still fail on any error during early HuC initialization.
Change that by ignoring HuC related errors until hardware
initialization phase where we can decide about next steps.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804195052.31140-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Since commit db81bc6eb9c0 ("drm/i915/uc: Consider enable_guc
modparam during fw selection") we have started using firmware
status as main indicator of the GuC support. No need to use
same checks twice.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804195052.31140-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We don't have to immediately fail on WOPCM partitioning, we can wait
until we will start programming WOPCM registers. This should give us
more options if we decide to restore fallback in case of GuC failures.
v3: rebased
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-7-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Inject probe errors into intel_uc_init_hw to make sure we
correctly handle any uC initialization failure.
To avoid complains from CI about injected errors use
i915_probe_error to lower message level.
v4: rebased after moving hot fixes moved to separate patches
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
On Gen9 when we try to reload HuC due to GuC upload error, we hit:
<7> [229.656688] [drm:intel_uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -8; will reset and retry 2 more time(s)
<7> [229.656739] [drm:intel_uc_fw_upload [i915]] HuC fw load i915/kbl_huc_ver02_00_1810.bin
<3> [229.656740] intel_uc_fw_upload:425 GEM_BUG_ON(intel_uc_fw_is_loaded(uc_fw))
as we performed only pure reset and didn't sanitized HuC fw status.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
As we already track GuC/HuC uses by other means than modparam
there is no point in sanitizing it. Just scan modparam for
major discrepancies between what was requested vs actual.
v2: rebased, reworded info messages
v3: oops
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190801132840.33176-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Rename intel_uc_is_using* into intel_uc_supports* to make clear
distinction from actual state (compare intel_uc_fw_is_running)
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
uC is a subcomponent of GT, so initialize/clean it as part of it. The
wopcm_init_early doesn't have to be happen before the uC one, but since
in other parts of the code we consider WOPCM first do the same for
consistency.
v2: s/cleanup_early/late_release to match the caller
v3: s/late_release/driver_late_release/ (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190801005709.34092-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The register we write are not WOPCM regs but uC ones related to how
GuC and HuC are going to use the WOPCM, so it makes logical sense
for them to be programmed as part of uc_init_hw. The WOPCM map on the
other side is not uC-specific (although that is our main use-case), so
keep that separate.
v2: move write_and_verify to uncore, fix log, re-use err_out tag,
add intel_wopcm_guc_base, fix log
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
When coming out of S3/S4 we sanitize and re-init the HW, which includes
enabling communication during uc_init_hw. We therefore don't want to do
that again in uc_resume and can just tell GuC to reload its state.
v2: split uc_resume and uc_runtime_resume to match the suspend
functions and to better differentiate the expected state in the 2
scenarios (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
HuC is usually not a critical component, so we can safely ignore
firmware load or authentication failures unless HuC was explicitly
requested by the user.
v2: add convenient way to disable loading (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190729112612.37476-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We are already storing runtime value of log level in private
field, so there is no need to modify modparam.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725205106.36148-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
