IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
A commit 28b208f600a3 ('ALSA: dice: add parameters of stream formats for
models produced by Alesis') adds wrong copy to rx parameters instead of
tx parameters for Alesis iO26.
This commit fixes the bug for v4.18-rc8.
Fixes: 28b208f600a3 ('ALSA: dice: add parameters of stream formats for models produced by Alesis')
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115156 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This device has the same issues as the HP x360 wrt the MUTE LED and
the front speakers not working. This patch fixes the MUTE LED issue,
but doesn't touch the HDA verbs. The fix for the x360 does not work
on the Spectre.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1381093 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1468847 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1468849 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1222121 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 146568 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1451415 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115103 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364478 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In case memory resources for *card* were allocated, release them before
return.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1472244 ("Resource leak")
Fixes: 6b1687bf76ef ("ASoC: qcom: add sdm845 sound card support")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
For a sake of code simplification, remove the init and the exit
entries that do nothing.
Notes for readers: actually it's OK to remove *both* init and exit,
but not OK to remove the exit entry. By removing only the exit while
keeping init, the module becomes permanently loaded; i.e. you cannot
unload it any longer!
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
For a sake of code simplification, remove the init and the exit
entries that do nothing.
Notes for readers: actually it's OK to remove *both* init and exit,
but not OK to remove the exit entry. By removing only the exit while
keeping init, the module becomes permanently loaded; i.e. you cannot
unload it any longer!
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
For a sake of code simplification, remove the init and the exit
entries that do nothing.
Notes for readers: actually it's OK to remove *both* init and exit,
but not OK to remove the exit entry. By removing only the exit while
keeping init, the module becomes permanently loaded; i.e. you cannot
unload it any longer!
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
For a sake of code simplification, remove the init and the exit
entries that do nothing.
Notes for readers: actually it's OK to remove *both* init and exit,
but not OK to remove the exit entry. By removing only the exit while
keeping init, the module becomes permanently loaded; i.e. you cannot
unload it any longer!
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
For a sake of code simplification, remove the init and the exit
entries that do nothing.
Notes for readers: actually it's OK to remove *both* init and exit,
but not OK to remove the exit entry. By removing only the exit while
keeping init, the module becomes permanently loaded; i.e. you cannot
unload it any longer!
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
For a sake of code simplification, remove the init and the exit
entries that do nothing.
Notes for readers: actually it's OK to remove *both* init and exit,
but not OK to remove the exit entry. By removing only the exit while
keeping init, the module becomes permanently loaded; i.e. you cannot
unload it any longer!
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115075 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402016 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1165394 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1167851 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402015 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1468367 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115037 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115038 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
DRM based audio components get registered inside the component framework
bind callback. However component framework has a big mutex lock taken for
every call to component_add, component_del and bind, unbind callbacks.
This can lead to deadlock situation if we are trying to add new/remove
component within a bind/unbind callbacks. Which is what was happening
with bcm2837 rpi 3.
Revert this change till we sort out the mutex issue.
Reported-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>
Reported-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Remove auto rebinding support, as component framework can deadlock
in few usecases if we are trying to add new/remove component within
a bind/unbind callbacks.
Card rebinding is ASoC core feature so all the previous component
framework stuff in q6dsp remains removed.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Remove auto rebinding support, as component framework can deadlock
in few usecases if we are trying to add new/remove component within
a bind/unbind callbacks.
Card rebinding is ASoC core feature so all the previous component
framework stuff in q6dsp remains removed.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Add DEPENDS_ON QCOM_APR for SND_SOC_SDM845 to fix the
warning: unmet direct dependencies detected for
SND_SOC_QDSP6.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Rohit kumar <rohitkr@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115050 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357430 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115045 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115043 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 146354 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115042 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115041 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115047 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1271174 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
