IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Add support to libbpf to append exception callbacks when loading a
program. The exception callback is found by discovering the declaration
tag 'exception_callback:<value>' and finding the callback in the value
of the tag.
The process is done in two steps. First, for each main program, the
bpf_object__sanitize_and_load_btf function finds and marks its
corresponding exception callback as defined by the declaration tag on
it. Second, bpf_object__reloc_code is modified to append the indicated
exception callback at the end of the instruction iteration (since
exception callback will never be appended in that loop, as it is not
directly referenced).
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-16-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Refactor bpf_object__append_subprog_code out of bpf_object__reloc_code
to be able to reuse it to append subprog related code for the exception
callback to the main program.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-15-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The kfunc code to handle KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CALLBACK does not check the reg
type before using reg->subprogno. This can accidently permit invalid
pointers from being passed into callback helpers (e.g. silently from
different paths). Likewise, reg->subprogno from the per-register type
union may not be meaningful either. We need to reject any other type
except PTR_TO_FUNC.
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Fixes: 5d92ddc3de1b ("bpf: Add callback validation to kfunc verifier logic")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-14-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
During testing, it was discovered that extensions to exception callbacks
had no checks, upon running a testcase, the kernel ended up running off
the end of a program having final call as bpf_throw, and hitting int3
instructions.
The reason is that while the default exception callback would have reset
the stack frame to return back to the main program's caller, the
replacing extension program will simply return back to bpf_throw, which
will instead return back to the program and the program will continue
execution, now in an undefined state where anything could happen.
The way to support extensions to an exception callback would be to mark
the BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT main subprog as an exception_cb, and prevent it
from calling bpf_throw. This would make the JIT produce a prologue that
restores saved registers and reset the stack frame. But let's not do
that until there is a concrete use case for this, and simply disallow
this for now.
Similar issues will exist for fentry and fexit cases, where trampoline
saves data on the stack when invoking exception callback, which however
will then end up resetting the stack frame, and on return, the fexit
program will never will invoked as the return address points to the main
program's caller in the kernel. Instead of additional complexity and
back and forth between the two stacks to enable such a use case, simply
forbid it.
One key point here to note is that currently X86_TAIL_CALL_OFFSET didn't
require any modifications, even though we emit instructions before the
corresponding endbr64 instruction. This is because we ensure that a main
subprog never serves as an exception callback, and therefore the
exception callback (which will be a global subprog) can never serve as
the tail call target, eliminating any discrepancies. However, once we
support a BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT to also act as an exception callback, it
will end up requiring change to the tail call offset to account for the
extra instructions. For simplicitly, tail calls could be disabled for
such targets.
Noting the above, it appears better to wait for a concrete use case
before choosing to permit extension programs to replace exception
callbacks.
As a precaution, we disable fentry and fexit for exception callbacks as
well.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-13-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has
noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code
elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following
a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain
ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the
eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as
seen.
The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions
which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime
when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call
instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted
as the final instruction in the program.
An example of such a program would be this:
do_something():
...
r0 = 0
exit
foo():
r1 = 0
call bpf_throw
r0 = 0
exit
bar(cond):
if r1 != 0 goto pc+2
call do_something
exit
call foo
r0 = 0 // Never seen by verifier
exit //
main(ctx):
r1 = ...
call bar
r0 = 0
exit
Here, if we do end up throwing, the stacktrace would be the following:
bpf_throw
foo
bar
main
In bar, the final instruction emitted will be the call to foo, as such,
the return address will be the subsequent instruction (which the JIT
emits as int3 on x86). This will end up lying outside the jited_len of
the program, thus, when unwinding, we will fail to discover the return
address as belonging to any program and end up in a panic due to the
unreliable stack unwinding of BPF programs that we never expect.
To remedy this case, make bpf_prog_ksym_find treat IP == ksym.end as
part of the BPF program, so that is_bpf_text_address returns true when
such a case occurs, and we are able to unwind reliably when the final
instruction ends up being a call instruction.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-12-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We require access to this kasan helper in BPF code in the next patch
where we have to unpoison the task stack when we unwind and reset the
stack frame from bpf_throw, and it never really unpoisons the poisoned
stack slots on entry when compiler instrumentation is generated by
CONFIG_KASAN_STACK and inline instrumentation is supported.
Also, remove the declaration from mm/kasan/kasan.h as we put it in the
header file kasan.h.
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-10-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In case of the default exception callback, change the behavior of
bpf_throw, where the passed cookie value is no longer ignored, but
is instead the return value of the default exception callback. As
such, we need to place restrictions on the value being passed into
bpf_throw in such a case, only allowing those permitted by the
check_return_code function.
Thus, bpf_throw can now control the return value of the program from
each call site without having the user install a custom exception
callback just to override the return value when an exception is thrown.
We also modify the hidden subprog instructions to now move BPF_REG_1 to
BPF_REG_0, so as to set the return value before exit in the default
callback.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Since exception callbacks are not referenced using bpf_pseudo_func and
bpf_pseudo_call instructions, check_cfg traversal will never explore
instructions of the exception callback. Even after adding the subprog,
the program will then fail with a 'unreachable insn' error.
We thus need to begin walking from the start of the exception callback
again in check_cfg after a complete CFG traversal finishes, so as to
explore the CFG rooted at the exception callback.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
By default, the subprog generated by the verifier to handle a thrown
exception hardcodes a return value of 0. To allow user-defined logic
and modification of the return value when an exception is thrown,
introduce the 'exception_callback:' declaration tag, which marks a
callback as the default exception handler for the program.
The format of the declaration tag is 'exception_callback:<value>', where
<value> is the name of the exception callback. Each main program can be
tagged using this BTF declaratiion tag to associate it with an exception
callback. In case the tag is absent, the default callback is used.
As such, the exception callback cannot be modified at runtime, only set
during verification.
Allowing modification of the callback for the current program execution
at runtime leads to issues when the programs begin to nest, as any
per-CPU state maintaing this information will have to be saved and
restored. We don't want it to stay in bpf_prog_aux as this takes a
global effect for all programs. An alternative solution is spilling
the callback pointer at a known location on the program stack on entry,
and then passing this location to bpf_throw as a parameter.
However, since exceptions are geared more towards a use case where they
are ideally never invoked, optimizing for this use case and adding to
the complexity has diminishing returns.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch splits the check_btf_info's check_btf_func check into two
separate phases. The first phase sets up the BTF and prepares
func_info, but does not perform any validation of required invariants
for subprogs just yet. This is left to the second phase, which happens
where check_btf_info executes currently, and performs the line_info and
CO-RE relocation.
The reason to perform this split is to obtain the userspace supplied
func_info information before we perform the add_subprog call, where we
would now require finding and adding subprogs that may not have a
bpf_pseudo_call or bpf_pseudo_func instruction in the program.
We require this as we want to enable userspace to supply exception
callbacks that can override the default hidden subprogram generated by
the verifier (which performs a hardcoded action). In such a case, the
exception callback may never be referenced in an instruction, but will
still be suitably annotated (by way of BTF declaration tags). For
finding this exception callback, we would require the program's BTF
information, and the supplied func_info information which maps BTF type
IDs to subprograms.
Since the exception callback won't actually be referenced through
instructions, later checks in check_cfg and do_check_subprogs will not
verify the subprog. This means that add_subprog needs to add them in the
add_subprog_and_kfunc phase before we move forward, which is why the BTF
and func_info are required at that point.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch implements BPF exceptions, and introduces a bpf_throw kfunc
to allow programs to throw exceptions during their execution at runtime.
A bpf_throw invocation is treated as an immediate termination of the
program, returning back to its caller within the kernel, unwinding all
stack frames.
This allows the program to simplify its implementation, by testing for
runtime conditions which the verifier has no visibility into, and assert
that they are true. In case they are not, the program can simply throw
an exception from the other branch.
BPF exceptions are explicitly *NOT* an unlikely slowpath error handling
primitive, and this objective has guided design choices of the
implementation of the them within the kernel (with the bulk of the cost
for unwinding the stack offloaded to the bpf_throw kfunc).
The implementation of this mechanism requires use of add_hidden_subprog
mechanism introduced in the previous patch, which generates a couple of
instructions to move R1 to R0 and exit. The JIT then rewrites the
prologue of this subprog to take the stack pointer and frame pointer as
inputs and reset the stack frame, popping all callee-saved registers
saved by the main subprog. The bpf_throw function then walks the stack
at runtime, and invokes this exception subprog with the stack and frame
pointers as parameters.
Reviewers must take note that currently the main program is made to save
all callee-saved registers on x86_64 during entry into the program. This
is because we must do an equivalent of a lightweight context switch when
unwinding the stack, therefore we need the callee-saved registers of the
caller of the BPF program to be able to return with a sane state.
Note that we have to additionally handle r12, even though it is not used
by the program, because when throwing the exception the program makes an
entry into the kernel which could clobber r12 after saving it on the
stack. To be able to preserve the value we received on program entry, we
push r12 and restore it from the generated subprogram when unwinding the
stack.
For now, bpf_throw invocation fails when lingering resources or locks
exist in that path of the program. In a future followup, bpf_throw will
be extended to perform frame-by-frame unwinding to release lingering
resources for each stack frame, removing this limitation.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Introduce support in the verifier for generating a subprogram and
include it as part of a BPF program dynamically after the do_check phase
is complete. The first user will be the next patch which generates
default exception callbacks if none are set for the program. The phase
of invocation will be do_misc_fixups. Note that this is an internal
verifier function, and should be used with instruction blocks which
uphold the invariants stated in check_subprogs.
Since these subprogs are always appended to the end of the instruction
sequence of the program, it becomes relatively inexpensive to do the
related adjustments to the subprog_info of the program. Only the fake
exit subprogram is shifted forward, making room for our new subprog.
This is useful to insert a new subprogram, get it JITed, and obtain its
function pointer. The next patch will use this functionality to insert a
default exception callback which will be invoked after unwinding the
stack.
Note that these added subprograms are invisible to userspace, and never
reported in BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_ID etc. For now, only a single
subprogram is supported, but more can be easily supported in the future.
To this end, two function counts are introduced now, the existing
func_cnt, and real_func_cnt, the latter including hidden programs. This
allows us to conver the JIT code to use the real_func_cnt for management
of resources while syscall path continues working with existing
func_cnt.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-4-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The plumbing for offline unwinding when we throw an exception in
programs would require walking the stack, hence introduce a new
arch_bpf_stack_walk function. This is provided when the JIT supports
exceptions, i.e. bpf_jit_supports_exceptions is true. The arch-specific
code is really minimal, hence it should be straightforward to extend
this support to other architectures as well, as it reuses the logic of
arch_stack_walk, but allowing access to unwind_state data.
Once the stack pointer and frame pointer are known for the main subprog
during the unwinding, we know the stack layout and location of any
callee-saved registers which must be restored before we return back to
the kernel. This handling will be added in the subsequent patches.
Note that while we primarily unwind through BPF frames, which are
effectively CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER, we still need one of this or
CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC to be able to unwind through the bpf_throw frame
from which we begin walking the stack. We also require both sp and bp
(stack and frame pointers) from the unwind_state structure, which are
only available when one of these two options are enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We would like to know whether a bpf_prog corresponds to the main prog or
one of the subprogs. The current JIT implementations simply check this
using the func_idx in bpf_prog->aux->func_idx. When the index is 0, it
belongs to the main program, otherwise it corresponds to some
subprogram.
This will also be necessary to halt exception propagation while walking
the stack when an exception is thrown, so we add a simple helper
function to check this, named bpf_is_subprog, and convert existing JIT
implementations to also make use of it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The BPF JITs now support cpuv4 instructions. Add tests for these new
instructions to the test suite:
1. Sign extended Load
2. Sign extended Mov
3. Unconditional byte swap
4. Unconditional jump with 32-bit offset
5. Signed division and modulo
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-9-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
ARM32 doesn't have instructions to do 64-bit/64-bit divisions. So, to
implement the following instructions:
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SDIV
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SMOD
We implement the above instructions by doing function calls to div64_u64()
and div64_u64_rem() for unsigned division/mod and calls to div64_s64()
for signed division/mod.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-7-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The cpuv4 added a new BPF_SDIV instruction that does signed division.
The encoding is similar to BPF_DIV but BPF_SDIV sets offset=1.
ARM32 already supports 32-bit BPF_DIV which can be easily extended to
support BPF_SDIV as ARM32 has the SDIV instruction. When the CPU is not
ARM-v7, we implement that SDIV/SMOD with the function call similar to
the implementation of DIV/MOD.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-6-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The cpuv4 added a new unconditional bswap instruction with following
behaviour:
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_TO_LE | BPF_END with imm = 16/32/64 means:
dst = bswap16(dst)
dst = bswap32(dst)
dst = bswap64(dst)
As we already support converting to big-endian from little-endian we can
use the same for unconditional bswap. just treat the unconditional scenario
the same as big-endian conversion.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-5-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The cpuv4 added a new BPF_MOVSX instruction that sign extends the src
before moving it to the destination.
BPF_ALU | BPF_MOVSX sign extends 8-bit and 16-bit operands into 32-bit
operands, and zeroes the remaining upper 32 bits.
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOVSX sign extends 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit operands
into 64-bit operands.
The offset field of the instruction is used to tell the number of bit to
use for sign-extension. BPF_MOV and BPF_MOVSX have the same code but the
former sets offset to 0 and the later one sets the offset to 8, 16 or 32
The behaviour of this instruction is dst = (s8,s16,s32)src
On ARM32 the implementation uses LSH and ARSH to extend the 8/16 bits to
a 32-bit register and then it is sign extended to the upper 32-bit
register using ARSH. For 32-bit we just move it to the destination
register and use ARSH to extend it to the upper 32-bit register.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-4-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The cpuv4 added the support of an instruction that is similar to load
but also sign-extends the result after the load.
BPF_MEMSX | <size> | BPF_LDX means dst = *(signed size *) (src + offset)
here <size> can be one of BPF_B, BPF_H, BPF_W.
ARM32 has instructions to load a byte or a half word with sign
extension into a 32bit register. As the JIT uses two 32 bit registers
to simulate a 64-bit BPF register, an extra instruction is emitted to
sign-extent the result up to the second register.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-3-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The cpuv4 adds unconditional jump with 32-bit offset where the immediate
field of the instruction is to be used to calculate the jump offset.
BPF_JA | BPF_K | BPF_JMP32 => gotol +imm => PC += imm.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907230550.1417590-2-puranjay12@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
There is no fundamental reason, why multi-buffer XDP and XDP kfunc RX hints
cannot coexist in a single program.
Allow those features to be used together by modifying the flags condition
for dev-bound-only programs, segments are still prohibited for fully
offloaded programs, hence additional check.
Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAKH8qBuzgtJj=OKMdsxEkyML36VsAuZpcrsXcyqjdKXSJCBq=Q@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230915083914.65538-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Stanislav Fomichev says:
====================
Extend netdev netlink family to expose the bitmask with the
kfuncs that the device implements. The source of truth is the
device's xdp_metadata_ops. There is some amount of auto-generated
netlink boilerplate; the change itself is super minimal.
v2:
- add netdev->xdp_metadata_ops NULL check when dumping to netlink (Martin)
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
====================
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The tool can be used to verify that everything works end to end.
Unrelated updates:
- include tools/include/uapi to pick the latest kernel uapi headers
- print "xdp-features" and "xdp-rx-metadata-features" so it's clear
which bitmask is being dumped
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913171350.369987-4-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Add new xdp-rx-metadata-features member to netdev netlink
which exports a bitmask of supported kfuncs. Most of the patch
is autogenerated (headers), the only relevant part is netdev.yaml
and the changes in netdev-genl.c to marshal into netlink.
Example output on veth:
$ ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 # ifndex == 12
$ ./tools/net/ynl/samples/netdev 12
Select ifc ($ifindex; or 0 = dump; or -2 ntf check): 12
veth1[12] xdp-features (23): basic redirect rx-sg xdp-rx-metadata-features (3): timestamp hash xdp-zc-max-segs=0
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913171350.369987-3-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
No functional changes.
Instead of having hand-crafted code in bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc,
move kfunc <> xmo handler relationship into XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_xxx.
This way, any time new kfunc is added, we don't have to touch
bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc.
Also document XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_xxx arguments since we now have
more than two and it might be confusing what is what.
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913171350.369987-2-sdf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Userspace applications indicate their multi-buffer capability to xsk
using XSK_USE_SG socket bind flag. For sockets using shared umem the
bind flag may contain XSK_USE_SG only for the first socket. For any
subsequent socket the only option supported is XDP_SHARED_UMEM.
Add option XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG in umem config flags to store the
multi-buffer handling capability when indicated by XSK_USE_SG option in
bing flag by the first socket. Use this to derive multi-buffer capability
for subsequent sockets in xsk core.
Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Fixes: 81470b5c3c66 ("xsk: introduce XSK_USE_SG bind flag for xsk socket")
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907035032.2627879-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Current code charges modmem for regular trampoline, but not for struct_ops
trampoline. Add bpf_jit_[charge|uncharge]_modmem() to struct_ops so the
trampoline is charged in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914222542.2986059-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This test relies on bpf_testmod, so skip it if the module is not available.
Fixes: aa3d65de4b900 ("bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230914124928.340701-1-asavkov@redhat.com
Magnus Karlsson says:
====================
seltests/xsk: various improvements to xskxceiver
This patch set implements several improvements to the xsk selftests
test suite that I thought were useful while debugging the xsk
multi-buffer code and tests. The largest new feature is the ability to
be able to execute a single test instead of the whole test suite. This
required some surgery on the current code, details below.
Anatomy of the path set:
1: Print useful info on a per packet basis with the option -v
2: Add a timeout in the transmission loop too. We only used to have
one for the Rx thread, but Tx can lock up too waiting for
completions.
3: Add an option (-m) to only run the tests (or a single test with a
later patch) in a single mode: skb, drv, or zc (zero-copy).
4-5: Preparatory patches to be able to specify a test to run. Need to
define the test names in a single structure and their entry
points, so we can use this when wanting to run a specific test.
6: Adds a command line option (-l) that lists all the tests.
7: Adds a command line option (-t) that runs a specific test instead
of the whole test suite. Can be combined with -m to specify a
single mode too.
8: Use ksft_print_msg() uniformly throughout the tests. It was a mix
of printf() and ksft_print_msg() before.
9: In some places, we failed the whole test suite instead of a single
test in certain circumstances. Fix this so only the test in
question is failed and the rest of the test suite continues.
10: Display the available command line options with -h
v3 -> v4:
* Fixed another spelling error in patch #9 [Maciej]
* Only allow the actual strings for the -m command [Maciej]
* Move some code from patch #7 to #3 [Maciej]
v2 -> v3:
* Drop the support for environment variables. Probably not useful. [Maciej]
* Fixed spelling mistake in patch #9 [Maciej]
* Fail gracefully if unsupported mode is chosen [Maciej]
* Simplified test run loop [Maciej]
v1 -> v2:
* Introduce XSKTEST_MODE env variable to be able to set the mode to
use [Przemyslaw]
* Introduce XSKTEST_ETH env variable to be able to set the ethernet
interface to use by introducing a new patch (#11) [Magnus]
* Fixed spelling error in patch #5 [Przemyslaw, Maciej]
* Fixed confusing documentation in patch #10 [Przemyslaw]
* The -l option can now be used without being root [Magnus, Maciej]
* Fixed documentation error in patch #7 [Maciej]
* Added error handling to the -t option [Maciej]
* -h now displayed as an option [Maciej]
Thanks: Magnus
====================
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add the -h option to display all available command line options
available for test_xsk.sh and xskxceiver.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-11-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In a number of places at en error, exit_with_error() is called that
terminates the whole test suite. This is not always desirable as it
would be more logical to only fail that test and then go along with
the other ones. So change this in a number of places in which I
thought it would be more logical to just fail the test in
question. Examples of this are in code that is only used by a single
test.
Also delete a pointless if-statement in receive_pkts() that has an
exit_with_error() in it. It can never occur since the return value is
an unsigned and the test is for less than zero.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-10-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use ksft_print_msg() instead of printf() and fprintf() in all places
as the ksefltests framework is being used. There is only one exception
and that is for the list-of-tests print out option, since no tests are
run in that case.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-9-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a command line option to be able to run a single test. This option
(-t) takes a number from the list of tests available with the "-l"
option. Here are two examples:
Run test number 2, the "receive single packet" test in all available modes:
./test_xsk.sh -t 2
Run test number 21, the metadata copy test in skb mode only
./test_xsh.sh -t 21 -m skb
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-8-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a command line option (-l) that lists all the tests. The number
before the test will be used in the next commit for specifying a
single test to run. Here is an example of the output:
Tests:
0: SEND_RECEIVE
1: SEND_RECEIVE_2K_FRAME
2: SEND_RECEIVE_SINGLE_PKT
3: POLL_RX
4: POLL_TX
5: POLL_RXQ_FULL
6: POLL_TXQ_FULL
7: SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED
:
:
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-7-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Declare the test names statically in a struct so that we can refer to
them when adding the support to execute a single test in the next
commit. Before this patch, the names of them were not declared in a
single place which made it not possible to refer to them.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-6-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Prepare for the capability to be able to run a single test by moving
all the tests to their own functions. This function can then be called
to execute that test in the next commit.
Also, the tests named RUN_TO_COMPLETION_* were not named well, so
change them to SEND_RECEIVE_* as it is just a basic send and receive
test of 4K packets.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-5-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add an option -m on the command line that allows the user to run the
tests in a single mode instead of all of them. Valid modes are skb,
drv, and zc (zero-copy). An example:
To run test suite in drv mode only:
./test_xsk.sh -m drv
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-4-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a timeout for the transmission thread. If packets are not
completed properly, for some reason, the test harness would previously
get stuck forever in a while loop. But with this patch, this timeout
will trigger, flag the test as a failure, and continue with the next
test.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-3-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Print info about every packet in verbose mode, both for Tx and
Rx. This is useful to have when a test fails or to validate that a
test is really doing what it was designed to do. Info on what is
supposed to be received and sent is also printed for the custom packet
streams since they differ from the base line. Here is an example:
Tx addr: 37e0 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 8
Tx addr: 4000 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 9
Rx: addr: 100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 0 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 1100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 1 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 2100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 4 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 3100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 8 valid: 1
Rx: addr: 4100 len: 64 options: 0 pkt_nb: 9 valid: 1
One pointless verbose print statement is also deleted and another one
is made clearer.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914084900.492-2-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit a5e2151ff9d5 ("net/ipv6: SKB symmetric hash should incorporate
transport ports") removed the use of FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_STOP_AT_FLOW_LABEL
in __skb_get_hash_symmetric(), making the doc out-of-date.
Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <qtian@vmware.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911152353.8280-1-qtian@vmware.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Leon Hwang says:
====================
bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop
This patch series fixes a tailcall infinite loop on x64.
From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.
From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.
From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.
How about combining them all together?
1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.
As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.
As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.
How did I discover the bug?
From commit 7f6e4312e15a5c37 ("bpf: Limit caller's stack depth 256 for
subprogs with tailcalls"), the total stack size limits to around 8KiB.
Then, I write some bpf progs to validate the stack consuming, that are
tailcalls running in bpf2bpf and FENTRY/FEXIT tracing on bpf2bpf.
At that time, accidently, I made a tailcall loop. And then the loop halted
my VM. Without the loop, the bpf progs would consume over 8KiB stack size.
But the _stack-overflow_ did not halt my VM.
With bpf_printk(), I confirmed that the tailcall count limit did not work
expectedly. Next, read the code and fix it.
Thank Ilya Leoshkevich, this bug on s390x has been fixed.
Hopefully, this bug on arm64 will be fixed in near future.
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add 4 test cases to confirm the tailcall infinite loop bug has been fixed.
Like tailcall_bpf2bpf cases, do fentry/fexit on the bpf2bpf, and then
check the final count result.
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs -t tailcalls
226/13 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry:OK
226/14 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit:OK
226/15 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_fexit:OK
226/16 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_fentry_entry:OK
226 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/16 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-4-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall
handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before.
From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms
for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64.
From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program
to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs.
How about combining them all together?
1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram.
2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram.
3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller.
As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt
the machine.
As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack
and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines.
Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT")
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Without understanding emit_prologue(), it is really hard to figure out
where does tail_call_cnt come from, even though searching tail_call_cnt
in the whole kernel repo.
By adding these comments, it is a little bit easier to understand
tail_call_cnt initialisation.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Get and check data_fd. It should not check map_fd again.
Meanwhile, correct some 'return' to 'goto out'.
Thank the suggestion from Maciej in "bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite
loop"[0] discussions.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e496aef8-1f80-0f8e-dcdd-25a8c300319a@gmail.com/T/#m7d3b601066ba66400d436b7e7579b2df4a101033
Fixes: 79d49ba048ec ("bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases")
Fixes: 3b0379111197 ("selftests/bpf: Add tailcall_bpf2bpf tests")
Fixes: 5e0b0a4c52d3 ("selftests/bpf: Test tail call counting with bpf2bpf and data on stack")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906154256.95461-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
