IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
To be used the debug tool that dumps the contents of the journal.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Btree node lock ordering is based on the logical key. However, 'struct
btree' may be reused for a different btree node under memory pressure.
This patch uses the new six lock callback to check if a btree node is no
longer the node we wanted to lock before blocking.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
__bch2_btree_node_lock() was incorrectly using iter->pos as a proxy for
btree node lock ordering, this caused an off by one error that was
triggered by bch2_btree_node_get_sibling() getting the previous node.
This refactors the code to compare against btree node keys directly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This splits out the journalling code from the btree update code; prep
work for the btree key cache.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is better than skipping the journal pre-reservation if we already
have one - we should still acount for the journal reservation we're
going to have to get.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We need a larger open bucket reserve now that the btree interior update
path holds onto open bucket references; filesystems with many high
through devices may need more open buckets now.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The btree cache lock is needed for reclaiming from the btree node cache,
and memory allocation can potentially spin and sleep (for 100 ms at a
time), so.. don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Also, in the btree_update_start() path, if we already have a journal
pre-reservation we don't want to take another - that's a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_node_mem_alloc() uses memalloc_nofs_save()/GFP_NOFS, but
GFP_NOFS does include __GFP_IO - oops. We used to use GFP_NOIO, but as
we're a filesystem now GFP_NOFS makes more sense now and is looser.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_iter_downgrade() was looping over all iterators in a
transaction; bch2_trans_downgrade() should be doing that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This will help narrow down which code is at fault when this happens.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
It's not needed anymore since we can now write to buckets before
updating the alloc btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This also consolidates the various checks in bch2_mark_pointer() and
bch2_trans_mark_pointer().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
There was a bad interaction with bch2_btree_iter_set_pos_same_leaf(),
which can leave a btree node locked that is just outside iter->pos,
breaking the lock ordering checks in __bch2_btree_node_lock(). Ideally
we should get rid of this corner case, but for now fix it locally with
verbose comments.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Intented to help debug deadlocks, since we can't use lockdep to check
btree node lock ordering.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Before we were setting features after allocating btree nodes, which
meant we were using the old btree pointer format.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Reflink might be buggy, so we're adding an option so users can help
bisect what's going on.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Now that interior btree updates are fully transactional, we don't need
to write out alloc info in a loop. However, interior btree updates do
put more things in the journal, so we still need a loop in the RO
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is to break a circular dependency in the shutdown path.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We now update the alloc info (bucket sector counts) atomically with
journalling the update to the interior btree nodes, and we also set new
btree roots atomically with the journalled part of the btree update.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When updates to interior nodes started being journalled, that meant that
after an unclean shutdown, until journal replay is done we can't walk
the btree without overlaying the updates from the journal.
The initial btree gc was changed to walk the btree overlaying keys from
the journal - but bch2_alloc_read() and bch2_stripes_read() were missed.
Major whoops...
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, there was at least one error path where we could mark the
filesystem clean when we hadn't sucessfully written out alloc info.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When a bkey_on_stack is passed to bch_read_indirect_extent, there is no
guarantee that it will be big enough to hold the bkey. And
bch_read_indirect_extent is not aware of bkey_on_stack to call realloc
on it. This cause a stack corruption.
This commit makes bch_read_indirect_extent aware of bkey_on_stack so it
can call realloc when appropriate.
Tested-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
vmalloc() and vmap() don't take GFP_NOFS - this should be pushed further
up the IO path, but for now just doing the simple fix.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We were marking the end of where we could insert incorrectly for
indirect extents.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We were returning -EINTR because we were failing to retry the btree
transaction.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
writes running out of a workqueue (via dio path) could block and prevent
other writes from calling bch2_write_index() and completing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
- Always pass BTREE_INSERT_USE_RESERVE when writing alloc btree keys
- Don't strand buckest on the copygc freelist until after recovery is
done and we're starting copygc.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When they were converted to kvpmalloc pools they weren't converted to
pass the actual size of the allocation. Oops.
Also, validate the real length in the zstd decompression path.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
In __bio_map_or_bounce(), the check for if the bio is physically
contiguous is improved; it's now more readable and handles multi page
but contiguous bios.
Also when decompressing, we were doing a redundant memcpy in the case
where we were able to use vmap to map a bio contigiously.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Deadlock on shutdown:
btree_update_nodes_written() unblocks btree nodes from being written;
after doing so, it has to check if they were marked as needing to be
written and if so kick off those writes - if that doesn't happen, we'll
never release journal pins and shutdown will get stuck when flushing the
journal.
There was an error path where this didn't happen, because in the error
path we don't actually want those btree nodes write to happen; however,
we still have to kick off the write path so the journal pins get
released. The btree write path checks if we're in a journal error state
and doesn't do the actual write if we are.
Also - there was another deadlock because btree_update_nodes_written()
was taking the btree update off of the unwritten_list too soon - before
getting a journal reservation, which could fail and have to be retried.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We also can't be blocking on btree node write locks while holding
btree_interior_update_lock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
the bcachefs io path in io.c can't bounce writes larger than that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is unfortunately really fragile - hopefully we'll be able to think
of a new approach at some point.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
btree_node_lock_increment() was incorrectly skipping over the current
iter when checking if we should increment a node we already have locked.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
peek_slot() shouldn't return -EINTR when there's only a single live
iterator, but that's tricky to guarantee - we seem to be returning
-EINTR when we shouldn't, but it's easy enough to handle in the caller.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
