IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Move the printers to the respective files for clarity. The
guc_load_status debugfs has been squashed in the guc_info one, has
having separate ones wasn't very useful. The HuC debugfs has been
renamed huc_info to match.
v2: keep printing HUC_STATUS2 (Tony), avoid const->non-const
container_of (Jani)
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We currently initialize HuC support based on GuC being enabled in
modparam; this means that huc_is_supported() can return false on HW that
does have a HuC when enable_guc=0. The rationale for this behavior is
that HuC requires GuC for authentication and therefore is not supported
by itself. However, we do not allow defining HuC fw wthout GuC fw and
selecting HuC in modparam implicitly selects GuC as well, so we can't
actually hit a scenario where HuC is selected alone. Therefore, we can
flip the support check to reflect the HW capabilities and fw
availability, which is more intuitive and will make it cleaner to log
HuC the difference between not supported in HW and not selected.
Removing the difference between GuC and HuC also allows us to simplify
the init_early, since we don't need to differentiate the support based
on the type of uC.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We are quite trigger happy in cleaning up the firmware blobs, as we do
so from several error/fini paths in GuC/HuC/uC code. We do have the
__uc_cleanup_firmwares cleanup function, which unwinds
__uc_fetch_firmwares and is already called both from the error path of
gem_init and from gem_driver_release, so let's stop cleaning up from
all the other paths.
The fact that we're not cleaning the firmware immediately means that
we can't consider firmware availability as an indication of
initialization success. A "LOADABLE" status has been added to
indicate that the initialization was successful, to be used to
selectively load HuC only if HuC init has completed (HuC init failure
is not considered a fatal error).
v2: s/ready_to_load/loadable (Michal), only run guc/huc_fini if the
fw is in loadable state
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Now that we can differentiate wants vs uses GuC/HuC, intel_uc_init is
restricted to running only if we have successfully fetched the required
blob(s) and are committed to using the microcontroller(s).
The only remaining thing that can go wrong in uc_init is the allocation
of GuC/HuC related objects; if we get such a failure better to bail out
immediately instead of wedging later, like we do for e.g.
intel_engines_init, since without objects we can't use the HW, including
not being able to attempt the firmware load.
While at it, remove the unneeded fw_cleanup call (this is handled
outside of gt_init) and add a probe failure injection point for testing.
Also, update the logs for <g/h>uc_init failures to probe_failure() since
they will cause the driver load to fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
To be able to differentiate the before and after of our commitment to
GuC submission, which will be used in follow-up patches to early set-up
the submission structures.
v2: move functions to guc_submission.h (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
On Braswell and Broxton (also known as Valleyview and Apollolake), we
need to serialise updates of the GGTT using the big stop_machine()
hammer. This has the side effect of appearing to lockdep as a possible
reclaim (since it uses the cpuhp mutex and that is tainted by per-cpu
allocations). However, we want to use vm->mutex (including ggtt->mutex)
from within the shrinker and so must avoid such possible taints. For this
purpose, we introduced the asynchronous vma binding and we can apply it
to the PIN_GLOBAL so long as take care to add the necessary waits for
the worker afterwards.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/211
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130181710.2030251-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Begin pulling the GT setup underneath a single GT umbrella; let intel_gt
take ownership of its engines! As hinted, the complication is the
lifetime of the probed engine versus the active lifetime of the GT
backends. We need to detect the engine layout early and keep it until
the end so that we can sanitize state on takeover and release.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222120752.1368352-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The Gen11+ and the legacy function differ in the register and value
written to interrupt the GuC. However, while on older gen the value
matches a bit on the register, on Gen11+ the value is a SW defined
payload that is sent to the FW. Since the FW behaves the same no matter
what value we pass to it, we can just write the same thing on all gens
and get rid of the function pointer by saving the register offset.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Since we started using CT buffers on all gens, the function pointers can
only be set to either the _nop() or the _ct() functions. Since the
_nop() case applies to when the CT are disabled, we can just handle that
case in the _ct() functions and call them directly.
v2: keep intel_guc_send() and make the CT send/receive functions work on
intel_guc_ct. (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We already have a couple of use-cases in the code and another one will
come in one of the later patches in the series.
v2: use the new function for the CT object as well
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
On some platforms (e.g. KBL) that do not support GuC submission, but
the user enabled the GuC communication (e.g for HuC authentication)
calling the GuC EXIT_S_STATE action results in lose of ability to
enter RC6. We can remove the GuC suspend/resume entirely as we do
not need to save the GuC submission status.
Add intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() function to determine if
GuC submission is active.
v2: Do not suspend/resume the GuC on platforms that do not support
Guc Submission.
v3: Fix typo, move suspend logic to remove goto.
v4: Use intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() to check GuC submission
status.
v5: No need to look at engine to determine if submission is enabled.
Squash fix + intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() patch into one.
v6: Move resume check into intel_guc_resume() for symmetry.
Fix commit Fixes tag.
Reported-by: KiteStramuort <kitestramuort@autistici.org>
Reported-by: S. Zharkoff <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111594
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111623
Fixes: ffd5ce22faa4 ("drm/i915/guc: Updates for GuC 32.0.3 firmware")
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceralo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Tomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Signed-off-by: Don Hiatt <don.hiatt@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115231538.1249-1-don.hiatt@intel.com
Recent GuC doesn't require the shared area. We still have one user in
i915 (engine reset via guc) because we haven't updated the command to
match the current guc submission flow [1]. Since the flow in guc is
about to change again, just disable the command for now and add a note
that we'll implement it as part of the new flow.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/295038/
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031013040.25803-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Pull the GuC interrupt handlers out of i915_irq.c. They now use the GT
interrupt facilities rather than the central dispatch.
Based on a patch by Chris Wilson.
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191024211642.7688-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add a short description of what we expect from GuC and some minor
improvements to existing documentation. Also remove a comment about a
difference between GuC and HuC that is not true anymore.
v2: add that the GuC is not mandatory (Martin)
v3: add extra newline for better text organization (Martin)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Anna Karas <anna.karas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014183602.3643-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Let's wait with decision about importance of uC failure to
hardware initialization step.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Be consistent and always perform fw fetch cleanup in GuC/HuC specific
init functions on every failure. Also while converting firmware
status to error, stop treating SELECTED as non-error, as long term
we should not see it.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
No need to use intel_uc_supports_guc_submission(uc) as we
can directly use intel_guc_is_submission_supported(guc)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190804195052.31140-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
The shrinker cannot touch objects used by the contexts (logical state
and ring). Currently we mark those as "pin_global" to let the shrinker
skip over them, however, if we remove them from the shrinker lists
entirely, we don't event have to include them in our shrink accounting.
By keeping the unshrinkable objects in our shrinker tracking, we report
a large number of objects available to be shrunk, and leave the shrinker
deeply unsatisfied when we fail to reclaim those. The shrinker will
persist in trying to reclaim the unavailable objects, forcing the system
into a livelock (not even hitting the dread oomkiller).
v2: Extend unshrinkable protection for perma-pinned scratch and guc
allocations (Tvrtko)
v3: Notice that we should be pinned when marking unshrinkable and so the
link cannot be empty; merge duplicate paths.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802212137.22207-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Instead of relying on enable_guc modparam to represent actual
GuC submission mode, use dedicated flag and look at modparam
only to check if submission was explicitly disabled by the user.
v2: rebased, simplified condition (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Rename intel_uc_is_using* into intel_uc_supports* to make clear
distinction from actual state (compare intel_uc_fw_is_running)
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
guc->stage_desc_pool is required as part of the init parameters and
there is no reason we have to init them after HuC. This fixes a NULL
ptr dereference due to guc->stage_desc_pool not being set (no fixes
tag since GuC submission can't be enabled yet).
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725174655.24382-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
All the GuC objects are perma-pinned, so their offset can't change at
runtime. We can therefore set (and log!) the parameters only once during
boot.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190724085849.18047-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Get rid of them to avoid more users being added while the guc code
transitions to use gt more than i915.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With our HW interface logic moving from i915 to gt and with GuC and HuC
being part of the gt HW, it makes sense to use the intel_gt structure
instead of i915 as our reference object in GuC/HuC paths.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
