IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Expose Zicboz through hwprobe and also provide a key to extract its
respective block size. Opportunistically add a macro and apply it to
current extensions in order to avoid duplicating code.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918131518.56803-11-ajones@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Commit f0bddf50586d ("riscv: entry: Convert to generic entry") moved
syscall handling to C code, which exposed function pointer type
mismatches that trip fine-grained forward-edge Control-Flow Integrity
(CFI) checks as syscall handlers are all called through the same
syscall_t pointer type. To fix the type mismatches, implement pt_regs
based syscall wrappers similarly to x86 and arm64.
This patch is based on arm64 syscall wrappers added in commit
4378a7d4be30 ("arm64: implement syscall wrappers"), where the main goal
was to minimize the risk of userspace-controlled values being used
under speculation. This may be a concern for riscv in future as well.
Following other architectures, the syscall wrappers generate three
functions for each syscall; __riscv_<compat_>sys_<name> takes a pt_regs
pointer and extracts arguments from registers, __se_<compat_>sys_<name>
is a sign-extension wrapper that casts the long arguments to the
correct types for the real syscall implementation, which is named
__do_<compat_>sys_<name>.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230710183544.999540-9-samitolvanen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> says:
This change detects the presence of Zba, Zbb, and Zbs extensions and exports
them per-hart to userspace via the hwprobe mechanism. Glibc can then use
these in setting up hwcaps-based library search paths.
There's a little bit of extra housekeeping here: the first change adds
Zba and Zbs to the set of extensions the kernel recognizes, and the second
change starts tracking ISA features per-hart (in addition to the ANDed
mask of features across all harts which the kernel uses to make
decisions). Now that we track the ISA information per-hart, we could
even fix up /proc/cpuinfo to accurately report extension per-hart,
though I've left that out of this series for now.
* b4-shazam-merge:
RISC-V: hwprobe: Expose Zba, Zbb, and Zbs
RISC-V: Track ISA extensions per hart
RISC-V: Add Zba, Zbs extension probing
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509182504.2997252-1-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Add two new bits to the IMA_EXT_0 key for ZBA, ZBB, and ZBS extensions.
These are accurately reported per CPU.
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509182504.2997252-4-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Probing kernel support for Vector extension is available now. This only
add detection for V only. Extenions like Zvfh, Zk are not in this scope.
Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605110724.21391-4-andy.chiu@sifive.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
id_bitsmash is unsigned. We need to explicitly check for -1, rather
than use > 0.
Fixes: aa5af0aa90ba ("RISC-V: Add hwprobe vDSO function and data")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230426141333.10063-3-ajones@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Only capture the first cpu_id in order for the comparison
below to be of any use.
Fixes: ea3de9ce8aa2 ("RISC-V: Add a syscall for HW probing")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230426141333.10063-2-ajones@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Add a vDSO function __vdso_riscv_hwprobe, which can sit in front of the
riscv_hwprobe syscall and answer common queries. We stash a copy of
static answers for the "all CPUs" case in the vDSO data page. This data
is private to the vDSO, so we can decide later to change what's stored
there or under what conditions we defer to the syscall. Currently all
data can be discovered at boot, so the vDSO function answers all queries
when the cpumask is set to the "all CPUs" hint.
There's also a boolean in the data that lets the vDSO function know that
all CPUs are the same. In that case, the vDSO will also answer queries
for arbitrary CPU masks in addition to the "all CPUs" hint.
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-7-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This allows userspace to select various routines to use based on the
performance of misaligned access on the target hardware.
Rather than adding DT bindings, this change taps into the alternatives
mechanism used to probe CPU errata. Add a new function pointer alongside
the vendor-specific errata_patch_func() that probes for desirable errata
(otherwise known as "features"). Unlike the errata_patch_func(), this
function is called on each CPU as it comes up, so it can save
feature information per-CPU.
The T-head C906 has fast unaligned access, both as defined by GCC [1],
and in performing a basic benchmark, which determined that byte copies
are >50% slower than a misaligned word copy of the same data size (source
for this test at [2]):
bytecopy size f000 count 50000 offset 0 took 31664899 us
wordcopy size f000 count 50000 offset 0 took 5180919 us
wordcopy size f000 count 50000 offset 1 took 13416949 us
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc#L353
[2] https://pastebin.com/EPXvDHSW
Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-5-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
We have an implicit set of base behaviors that userspace depends on,
which are mostly defined in various ISA specifications.
Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-4-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
We don't have enough space for these all in ELF_HWCAP{,2} and there's no
system call that quite does this, so let's just provide an arch-specific
one to probe for hardware capabilities. This currently just provides
m{arch,imp,vendor}id, but with the key-value pairs we can pass more in
the future.
Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-3-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Commit 2139619bcad7 ("riscv: mmap with PROT_WRITE but no PROT_READ is
invalid") made mmap() return EINVAL if PROT_WRITE was set wihtout
PROT_READ with the justification that a write-only PTE is considered a
reserved PTE permission bit pattern in the privileged spec. This check
is unnecessary since we let VM_WRITE imply VM_READ on RISC-V, and it is
inconsistent with other architectures that don't support write-only PTEs,
creating a potential software portability issue. Just remove the check
altogether and let PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ as is the case on other
architectures.
Note that this also allows PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC mappings which were
disallowed prior to the aforementioned commit; PROT_READ is implied in
such mappings as well.
Fixes: 2139619bcad7 ("riscv: mmap with PROT_WRITE but no PROT_READ is invalid")
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@rivosinc.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220915193702.2201018-3-abrestic@rivosinc.com/
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
As mentioned in Table 4.5 in RISC-V spec Volume 2 Section 4.3, write
but not read is "Reserved for future use.". For now, they are not valid.
In the current code, -wx is marked as invalid, but -w- is not marked
as invalid.
This patch refines that judgment.
Reported-by: xctan <xc-tan@outlook.com>
Co-developed-by: dram <dramforever@live.com>
Signed-off-by: dram <dramforever@live.com>
Co-developed-by: Ruizhe Pan <c141028@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruizhe Pan <c141028@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Celeste Liu <coelacanthus@outlook.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/PH7PR14MB559464DBDD310E755F5B21E8CEDC9@PH7PR14MB5594.namprd14.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
As per the table 4.4 of version "20190608-Priv-MSU-Ratified" of the
RISC-V instruction set manual[0], the PTE permission bit combination of
"write+exec only" is reserved for future use. Hence, don't allow such
mapping request in mmap call.
An issue is been reported by David Abdurachmanov, that while running
stress-ng with "sysbadaddr" argument, RCU stalls are observed on RISC-V
specific kernel.
This issue arises when the stress-sysbadaddr request for pages with
"write+exec only" permission bits and then passes the address obtain
from this mmap call to various system call. For the riscv kernel, the
mmap call should fail for this particular combination of permission bits
since it's not valid.
[0]: http://dabbelt.com/~palmer/keep/riscv-isa-manual/riscv-privileged-20190608-1.pdf
Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>
Reported-by: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
[Palmer: Refer to the latest ISA specification at the only link I could
find, and update the terminology.]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation version 2 this program is distributed
in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without
even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a
particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more
details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 97 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190529141901.025053186@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thanks to Christoph Hellwig for pointing out a cleaner way to do this,
as my approach was quite ugly.
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
This would be necessary to make non-SMP builds work, but there is
another error in the implementation of our syscall linkage that actually
just causes sys_riscv_flush_icache to never build. I've build tested
this on allnoconfig and allnoconfig+SMP=y, as well as defconfig like
normal.
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180809055830.GA17533@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180809132612.GA31058@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Using this helper allows us to avoid the in-kernel calls to the
sys_mmap_pgoff() syscall. The ksys_ prefix denotes that this function is
meant as a drop-in replacement for the syscall. In particular, it uses the
same calling convention as sys_mmap_pgoff().
This patch is part of a series which removes in-kernel calls to syscalls.
On this basis, the syscall entry path can be streamlined. For details, see
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180325162527.GA17492@light.dominikbrodowski.net
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
In the current code, there is a ! logical NOT where a bitwise ~ NOT was
intended. It means that we never return -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
We used to have some cmpxchg syscalls. They're no longer there, so we
no longer need the include.
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Despite RISC-V having a direct 'fence.i' instruction available to
userspace (which we can't trap!), that's not actually viable when
running on Linux because the kernel might schedule a process on another
hart. There is no way for userspace to handle this without invoking the
kernel (as it doesn't know the thread->hart mappings), so we've defined
a RISC-V specific system call to flush the instruction cache.
This patch adds both a system call and a VDSO entry. If possible, we'd
like to avoid having the system call be considered part of the
user-facing ABI and instead restrict that to the VDSO entry -- both just
in general to avoid having additional user-visible ABI to maintain, and
because we'd prefer that users just call the VDSO entry because there
might be a better way to do this in the future (ie, one that doesn't
require entering the kernel).
Signed-off-by: Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
This patch contains code that is in some way visible to the user:
including via system calls, the VDSO, module loading and signal
handling. It also contains some generic code that is ABI visible.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
