IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The Actions composite factor clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-48-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions composite divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-47-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The tlv320aic32x4 clkin clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-46-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Allwinner sun6i RTC clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-45-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The TI J721e Wiz clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-44-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The TI AM654 SerDes clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-43-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Cadence Torrent refclk clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-42-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Cadence Sierra PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-41-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra sor pad clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-40-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versatile sp810 "timerclken" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
This mismatch is probably due to the fact that the driver introduction
predates the determine_rate introduction, and it was never revised since
then.
The default, implicit, behaviour that has been in use so far has thus
been to simply keep using the current parent in all cases. This is also
the behaviour of the new clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() helper, so
we can simply use it to make our expectation explicit.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-39-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The UX500 sysctrl "set_parent" clocks implement a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-38-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The UX500 PRCMU "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The PRCMU binding also allows to specify the default clock parent
through a device tree cell. This will be enforced at prepare time by the
driver.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
The result is that the driver relies on prepare to set the default
parent, and thus the set_parent hook is effectively unused by design.
We can make that decision explicit by setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() that will keep the
same behaviour. Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided,
clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself
on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the
clock rate otherwise.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-37-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra periph nodiv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-36-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra super mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-35-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra BPMP mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-34-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-33-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SoCFGPA gate clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-32-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Renesas r9a06g032 bitselect clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-31-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The PXA "CKEN" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-30-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Mediatek cpumux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-29-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX SCU mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-28-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX fixup mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-27-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX busy clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-26-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip "clk48" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-25-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-24-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The WM381x "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-23-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versaclock5 "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-22-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versaclock5 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-21-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32F4 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-20-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5341 clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-19-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Qoriq mux clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-18-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The lochnagar clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Since there's no upstream device tree using that driver, it's a bit hard
to tell if it uses the assigned-clock properties. The binding and its
example uses them though, so it's likely that the author intent was to
force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but
through an explicit call to clk_set_parent().
This case is equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to
clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-17-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The LKM04832 "CLKOUT" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Reviewed-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-16-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-15-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 ACLK clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-14-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-13-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 "clkin" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-12-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Berlin2 divider clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-11-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SAM9x5 slow clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-10-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SAM9x5 main clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-9-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions "Pass" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-8-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The single parent clock in our kunit tests implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is not entirely unexpected, since its whole purpose it to have a
single parent. When determine_rate is missing, and since
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set for all its instances, the default behaviour
of the framework will be to forward it to the current parent.
This is totally fine as far as the tests are concerned, but we'll start
to mandate a determine_rate implementation when set_parent is set, so
let's fill it with __clk_mux_determine_rate() which will have the same
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-7-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The nodrv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't
provide a determine_rate implementation.
Even though it's a mock clock and the missing function is harmless,
we'll start to require a determine_rate implementation when set_parent
is set, so let's fill it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-6-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The lan966x driver registers a gck clock with both a determine_rate and
a round_rate implementation. Both are equivalent, and are only called by
clk_core_determine_round_nolock() which favors determine_rate.
Thus, lan966x_gck_round_rate() is never called, so we can just remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-5-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Some clock drivers do not want to allow any reparenting on a given
clock, but usually do so by not providing any determine_rate
implementation.
Whenever we call clk_round_rate() or clk_set_rate(), this leads to
clk_core_can_round() returning false and thus the rest of the function
either forwarding the rate request to its current parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, or just returning the current clock rate.
This behaviour happens implicitly, and as we move forward to making a
determine_rate implementation required for muxes, we need some way to
explicitly opt-in for that behaviour.
Fortunately, this is exactly what the clk_core_determine_rate_no_reparent()
function is doing, so we can simply make it available to drivers.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-4-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
clk_round_rate() may return a negative error code, but most of the
variables we defined to store its returned value are unsigned.
This obviously leads to issues on error.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-2-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Commit 262ca38f4b6e ("clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the
parent") introduced the public clk_hw_forward_rate_request() function,
but didn't export the symbol. Make sure it's the case.
Fixes: 262ca38f4b6e ("clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-1-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
We need to better polish building with BPF skels, so revert back to
making it an experimental feature that has to be explicitely enabled
using BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYKAB0WIQR2GiIUctdOfX2qHhGyPKLppCJ+JwUCZFbCXwAKCRCyPKLppCJ+
J7cHAP97erKY4hBXArjpfzcvpFmboh/oqhbTLntyIpS6TEnOyQEAyervAPGIjQYC
DCo4foyXmOWn3dhNtK9M+YiRl3o2SgQ=
=7G78
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'perf-tools-for-v6.4-3-2023-05-06' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux
Pull perf tool updates from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
"Third version of perf tool updates, with the build problems with with
using a 'vmlinux.h' generated from the main build fixed, and the bpf
skeleton build disabled by default.
Build:
- Require libtraceevent to build, one can disable it using
NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1.
It is required for tools like 'perf sched', 'perf kvm', 'perf
trace', etc.
libtraceevent is available in most distros so installing
'libtraceevent-devel' should be a one-time event to continue
building perf as usual.
Using NO_LIBTRACEEVENT=1 produces tooling that is functional and
sufficient for lots of users not interested in those libtraceevent
dependent features.
- Allow Python support in 'perf script' when libtraceevent isn't
linked, as not all features requires it, for instance Intel PT does
not use tracepoints.
- Error if the python interpreter needed for jevents to work isn't
available and NO_JEVENTS=1 isn't set, preventing a build without
support for JSON vendor events, which is a rare but possible
condition. The two check error messages:
$(error ERROR: No python interpreter needed for jevents generation. Install python or build with NO_JEVENTS=1.)
$(error ERROR: Python interpreter needed for jevents generation too old (older than 3.6). Install a newer python or build with NO_JEVENTS=1.)
- Make libbpf 1.0 the minimum required when building with out of
tree, distro provided libbpf.
- Use libsdtc++'s and LLVM's libcxx's __cxa_demangle, a portable C++
demangler, add 'perf test' entry for it.
- Make binutils libraries opt in, as distros disable building with it
due to licensing, they were used for C++ demangling, for instance.
- Switch libpfm4 to opt-out rather than opt-in, if libpfm-devel (or
equivalent) isn't installed, we'll just have a build warning:
Makefile.config:1144: libpfm4 not found, disables libpfm4 support. Please install libpfm4-dev
- Add a feature test for scandirat(), that is not implemented so far
in musl and uclibc, disabling features that need it, such as
scanning for tracepoints in /sys/kernel/tracing/events.
perf BPF filters:
- New feature where BPF can be used to filter samples, for instance:
$ sudo ./perf record -e cycles --filter 'period > 1000' true
$ sudo ./perf script
perf-exec 2273949 546850.708501: 5029 cycles: ffffffff826f9e25 finish_wait+0x5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf-exec 2273949 546850.708508: 32409 cycles: ffffffff826f9e25 finish_wait+0x5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf-exec 2273949 546850.708526: 143369 cycles: ffffffff82b4cdbf xas_start+0x5f ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf-exec 2273949 546850.708600: 372650 cycles: ffffffff8286b8f7 __pagevec_lru_add+0x117 ([kernel.kallsyms])
perf-exec 2273949 546850.708791: 482953 cycles: ffffffff829190de __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x4e ([kernel.kallsyms])
true 2273949 546850.709036: 501985 cycles: ffffffff828add7c tlb_gather_mmu+0x4c ([kernel.kallsyms])
true 2273949 546850.709292: 503065 cycles: 7f2446d97c03 _dl_map_object_deps+0x973 (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
- In addition to 'period' (PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD), the other
PERF_SAMPLE_ can be used for filtering, and also some other sample
accessible values, from tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt:
Essentially the BPF filter expression is:
<term> <operator> <value> (("," | "||") <term> <operator> <value>)*
The <term> can be one of:
ip, id, tid, pid, cpu, time, addr, period, txn, weight, phys_addr,
code_pgsz, data_pgsz, weight1, weight2, weight3, ins_lat, retire_lat,
p_stage_cyc, mem_op, mem_lvl, mem_snoop, mem_remote, mem_lock,
mem_dtlb, mem_blk, mem_hops
The <operator> can be one of:
==, !=, >, >=, <, <=, &
The <value> can be one of:
<number> (for any term)
na, load, store, pfetch, exec (for mem_op)
l1, l2, l3, l4, cxl, io, any_cache, lfb, ram, pmem (for mem_lvl)
na, none, hit, miss, hitm, fwd, peer (for mem_snoop)
remote (for mem_remote)
na, locked (for mem_locked)
na, l1_hit, l1_miss, l2_hit, l2_miss, any_hit, any_miss, walk, fault (for mem_dtlb)
na, by_data, by_addr (for mem_blk)
hops0, hops1, hops2, hops3 (for mem_hops)
perf lock contention:
- Show lock type with address.
- Track and show mmap_lock, siglock and per-cpu rq_lock with address.
This is done for mmap_lock by following the current->mm pointer:
$ sudo ./perf lock con -abl -- sleep 10
contended total wait max wait avg wait address symbol
...
16344 312.30 ms 2.22 ms 19.11 us ffff8cc702595640
17686 310.08 ms 1.49 ms 17.53 us ffff8cc7025952c0
3 84.14 ms 45.79 ms 28.05 ms ffff8cc78114c478 mmap_lock
3557 76.80 ms 68.75 us 21.59 us ffff8cc77ca3af58
1 68.27 ms 68.27 ms 68.27 ms ffff8cda745dfd70
9 54.53 ms 7.96 ms 6.06 ms ffff8cc7642a48b8 mmap_lock
14629 44.01 ms 60.00 us 3.01 us ffff8cc7625f9ca0
3481 42.63 ms 140.71 us 12.24 us ffffffff937906ac vmap_area_lock
16194 38.73 ms 42.15 us 2.39 us ffff8cd397cbc560
11 38.44 ms 10.39 ms 3.49 ms ffff8ccd6d12fbb8 mmap_lock
1 5.43 ms 5.43 ms 5.43 ms ffff8cd70018f0d8
1674 5.38 ms 422.93 us 3.21 us ffffffff92e06080 tasklist_lock
581 4.51 ms 130.68 us 7.75 us ffff8cc9b1259058
5 3.52 ms 1.27 ms 703.23 us ffff8cc754510070
112 3.47 ms 56.47 us 31.02 us ffff8ccee38b3120
381 3.31 ms 73.44 us 8.69 us ffffffff93790690 purge_vmap_area_lock
255 3.19 ms 36.35 us 12.49 us ffff8d053ce30c80
- Update default map size to 16384.
- Allocate single letter option -M for --map-nr-entries, as it is
proving being frequently used.
- Fix struct rq lock access for older kernels with BPF's CO-RE
(Compile once, run everywhere).
- Fix problems found with MSAn.
perf report/top:
- Add inline information when using --call-graph=fp or lbr, as was
already done to the --call-graph=dwarf callchain mode.
- Improve the 'srcfile' sort key performance by really using an
optimization introduced in 6.2 for the 'srcline' sort key that
avoids calling addr2line for comparision with each sample.
perf sched:
- Make 'perf sched latency/map/replay' to use "sched:sched_waking"
instead of "sched:sched_waking", consistent with 'perf record'
since d566a9c2d482 ("perf sched: Prefer sched_waking event when it
exists").
perf ftrace:
- Make system wide the default target for latency subcommand, run the
following command then generate some network traffic and press
control+C:
# perf ftrace latency -T __kfree_skb
^C
DURATION | COUNT | GRAPH |
0 - 1 us | 27 | ############# |
1 - 2 us | 22 | ########### |
2 - 4 us | 8 | #### |
4 - 8 us | 5 | ## |
8 - 16 us | 24 | ############ |
16 - 32 us | 2 | # |
32 - 64 us | 1 | |
64 - 128 us | 0 | |
128 - 256 us | 0 | |
256 - 512 us | 0 | |
512 - 1024 us | 0 | |
1 - 2 ms | 0 | |
2 - 4 ms | 0 | |
4 - 8 ms | 0 | |
8 - 16 ms | 0 | |
16 - 32 ms | 0 | |
32 - 64 ms | 0 | |
64 - 128 ms | 0 | |
128 - 256 ms | 0 | |
256 - 512 ms | 0 | |
512 - 1024 ms | 0 | |
1 - ... s | 0 | |
#
perf top:
- Add --branch-history (LBR: Last Branch Record) option, just like
already available for 'perf record'.
- Fix segfault in thread__comm_len() where thread->comm was being
used outside thread->comm_lock.
perf annotate:
- Allow configuring objdump and addr2line in ~/.perfconfig., so that
you can use alternative binaries, such as llvm's.
perf kvm:
- Add TUI mode for 'perf kvm stat report'.
Reference counting:
- Add reference count checking infrastructure to check for use after
free, done to the 'cpumap', 'namespaces', 'maps' and 'map' structs,
more to come.
To build with it use -DREFCNT_CHECKING=1 in the make command line
to build tools/perf. Documented at:
https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Reference_Count_Checking
- The above caught, for instance, fix, present in this series:
- Fix maps use after put in 'perf test "Share thread maps"':
'maps' is copied from leader, but the leader is put on line 79
and then 'maps' is used to read the reference count below - so
a use after put, with the put of maps happening within
thread__put.
Fixed by reversing the order of puts so that the leader is put
last.
- Also several fixes were made to places where reference counts were
not being held.
- Make this one of the tests in 'make -C tools/perf build-test' to
regularly build test it and to make sure no direct access to the
reference counted structs are made, doing that via accessors to
check the validity of the struct pointer.
ARM64:
- Fix 'perf report' segfault when filtering coresight traces by
sparse lists of CPUs.
- Add support for 'simd' as a sort field for 'perf report', to show
ARM's NEON SIMD's predicate flags: "partial" and "empty".
arm64 vendor events:
- Add N1 metrics.
Intel vendor events:
- Add graniterapids, grandridge and sierraforrest events.
- Refresh events for: alderlake, aldernaken, broadwell, broadwellde,
broadwellx, cascadelakx, haswell, haswellx, icelake, icelakex,
jaketown, meteorlake, knightslanding, sandybridge, sapphirerapids,
silvermont, skylake, tigerlake and westmereep-dp
- Refresh metrics for alderlake-n, broadwell, broadwellde,
broadwellx, haswell, haswellx, icelakex, ivybridge, ivytown and
skylakex.
perf stat:
- Implement --topdown using JSON metrics.
- Add TopdownL1 JSON metric as a default if present, but disable it
for now for some Intel hybrid architectures, a series of patches
addressing this is being reviewed and will be submitted for v6.5.
- Use metrics for --smi-cost.
- Update topdown documentation.
Vendor events (JSON) infrastructure:
- Add support for computing and printing metric threshold values. For
instance, here is one found in thesapphirerapids json file:
{
"BriefDescription": "Percentage of cycles spent in System Management Interrupts.",
"MetricExpr": "((msr@aperf@ - cycles) / msr@aperf@ if msr@smi@ > 0 else 0)",
"MetricGroup": "smi",
"MetricName": "smi_cycles",
"MetricThreshold": "smi_cycles > 0.1",
"ScaleUnit": "100%"
},
- Test parsing metric thresholds with the fake PMU in 'perf test
pmu-events'.
- Support for printing metric thresholds in 'perf list'.
- Add --metric-no-threshold option to 'perf stat'.
- Add rand (reverse and) and has_pmem (optane memory) support to
metrics.
- Sort list of input files to avoid depending on the order from
readdir() helping in obtaining reproducible builds.
S/390:
- Add common metrics: - CPI (cycles per instruction), prbstate (ratio
of instructions executed in problem state compared to total number
of instructions), l1mp (Level one instruction and data cache misses
per 100 instructions).
- Add cache metrics for z13, z14, z15 and z16.
- Add metric for TLB and cache.
ARM:
- Add raw decoding for SPE (Statistical Profiling Extension) v1.3 MTE
(Memory Tagging Extension) and MOPS (Memory Operations) load/store.
Intel PT hardware tracing:
- Add event type names UINTR (User interrupt delivered) and UIRET
(Exiting from user interrupt routine), documented in table 32-50
"CFE Packet Type and Vector Fields Details" in the Intel Processor
Trace chapter of The Intel SDM Volume 3 version 078.
- Add support for new branch instructions ERETS and ERETU.
- Fix CYC timestamps after standalone CBR
ARM CoreSight hardware tracing:
- Allow user to override timestamp and contextid settings.
- Fix segfault in dso lookup.
- Fix timeless decode mode detection.
- Add separate decode paths for timeless and per-thread modes.
auxtrace:
- Fix address filter entire kernel size.
Miscellaneous:
- Fix use-after-free and unaligned bugs in the PLT handling routines.
- Use zfree() to reduce chances of use after free.
- Add missing 0x prefix for addresses printed in hexadecimal in 'perf
probe'.
- Suppress massive unsupported target platform errors in the unwind
code.
- Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id().
- Fix 'perf scripts intel-pt-events.py' IPC output for Python 2 .
- Add missing new parameter in kfree_skb tracepoint to the python
scripts using it.
- Add 'perf bench syscall fork' benchmark.
- Add support for printing PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_UNC (Uncached access) in
'perf mem'.
- Fix wrong size expectation for perf test 'Setup struct
perf_event_attr' caused by the patch adding
perf_event_attr::config3.
- Fix some spelling mistakes"
* tag 'perf-tools-for-v6.4-3-2023-05-06' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux: (365 commits)
Revert "perf build: Make BUILD_BPF_SKEL default, rename to NO_BPF_SKEL"
Revert "perf build: Warn for BPF skeletons if endian mismatches"
perf metrics: Fix SEGV with --for-each-cgroup
perf bpf skels: Stop using vmlinux.h generated from BTF, use subset of used structs + CO-RE
perf stat: Separate bperf from bpf_profiler
perf test record+probe_libc_inet_pton: Fix call chain match on x86_64
perf test record+probe_libc_inet_pton: Fix call chain match on s390
perf tracepoint: Fix memory leak in is_valid_tracepoint()
perf cs-etm: Add fix for coresight trace for any range of CPUs
perf build: Fix unescaped # in perf build-test
perf unwind: Suppress massive unsupported target platform errors
perf script: Add new parameter in kfree_skb tracepoint to the python scripts using it
perf script: Print raw ip instead of binary offset for callchain
perf symbols: Fix return incorrect build_id size in elf_read_build_id()
perf list: Modify the warning message about scandirat(3)
perf list: Fix memory leaks in print_tracepoint_events()
perf lock contention: Rework offset calculation with BPF CO-RE
perf lock contention: Fix struct rq lock access
perf stat: Disable TopdownL1 on hybrid
perf stat: Avoid SEGV on counter->name
...
Maxime Ripard
Stephen Boyd
Linus Torvalds