IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
revert:
"x86: fix breakage of vSMP irq operations"
the irqflags.h unification will solve this in a cleaner way.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> yhlu@mpk:~/xx/xx/kernel/x86/linux-2.6> git-bisect bad
> d1c707188ad646c8094cac9afb1738e7d0196ff2 is first bad commit
> commit d1c707188ad646c8094cac9afb1738e7d0196ff2
> Author: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Mar 19 14:25:53 2008 -0300
>
> x86: include mach_apic.h in smpboot_64.c and smpboot.c
>
> After the inclusion, a lot of files needs fixing for conflicts,
> some of them in the headers themselves, to accomodate for both
> i386 and x86_64 versions.
>
> [ mingo@elte.hu: build fix ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> :040000 040000 19f574e64bb8003bbe984f3a8c1315db969dfdcd
> 6ffe96588c77bc936705599fa110107856201115 M arch
> :040000 040000 61269347ad4f384ed85cc87c4f2d004ed94492ac
> 8f5c713da25579a3cdf63db3d4c2f795261d0521 M include
> yhlu@mpk:~/xx/xx/kernel/x86/linux-2.6>
>
attached patch fixes that.
This patch does clean up relocate_kernel_(32|64).S a bit by getting rid
of local PAGE_ALIGNED macro. We should use well-known PAGE_SIZE instead
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Allow the maximum number of nodes in an x86_64 system to
be configurable. This patch does NOT change the default value
but allows the value to be a config option.
Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Increase the maximum physical address size of x86_64 system
to 44-bits. This is in preparation for future chips that
support larger physical memory sizes.
Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This (simplified) piece of code didn't behave as expected due to
incorrect constraints in some of the bitops functions, when
X86_FEATURE_xxx is referring to other than the first long:
int test(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_xxx))
clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_xxx);
return cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_xxx);
}
I'd really like understand, though, what the policy of (not) having a
"memory" clobber in these operations is - currently, this appears to
be totally inconsistent. Also, many comments of the non-atomic
functions say those may also be re-ordered - this contradicts the use
of "asm volatile" in there, which again I'd like to understand.
As much as all of these, using 'int' for the 'nr' parameter and
'void *' for the 'addr' one is in conflict with
Documentation/atomic_ops.txt, especially because bt{,c,r,s} indeed
take the bit index as signed (which hence would really need special
precaution) and access the full 32 bits (if 'unsigned long' was used
properly here, 64 bits for x86-64) pointed at, so invalid uses like
referencing a 'char' array cannot currently be caught.
Finally, the code with and without this patch relies heavily on the
-fno-strict-aliasing compiler switch and I'm not certain this really
is a good idea.
In the light of all of this I'm sending this as RFC, as fixing the
above might warrant a much bigger patch...
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
