IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The only user of memblock_dbg() outside memblock was s390 setup code and
it is converted to use pr_debug() instead. This allows to stop exposing
memblock_debug and memblock_dbg() to the rest of the kernel.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make memblock_dbg() safer and neater]
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-10-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
dummy_numa_init() loops over memblock.memory and passes nid=0 to
numa_add_memblk() which essentially wraps memblock_set_node(). However,
memblock_set_node() can cope with entire memory span itself, so the loop
over memblock.memory regions is redundant.
Using a single call to memblock_set_node() rather than a loop also fixes
an issue with a buggy ACPI firmware in which the SRAT table covers some
but not all of the memory in the EFI memory map.
Jonathan Cameron says:
This issue can be easily triggered by having an SRAT table which fails
to cover all elements of the EFI memory map.
This firmware error is detected and a warning printed. e.g.
"NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node 64 [mem 0x240000000-0x27fffffff]"
At that point we fall back to dummy_numa_init().
However, the failed ACPI init has left us with our memblocks all broken
up as we split them when trying to assign them to NUMA nodes.
We then iterate over the memblocks and add them to node 0.
numa_add_memblk() calls memblock_set_node() which merges regions that
were previously split up during the earlier attempt to add them to
different nodes during parsing of SRAT.
This means elements are moved in the memblock array and we can end up
in a different memblock after the call to numa_add_memblk().
Result is:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000003a40
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x96000004
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
CM = 0, WnR = 0
[0000000000003a40] user address but active_mm is swapper
Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
...
Call trace:
sparse_init_nid+0x5c/0x2b0
sparse_init+0x138/0x170
bootmem_init+0x80/0xe0
setup_arch+0x2a0/0x5fc
start_kernel+0x8c/0x648
Replace the loop with a single call to memblock_set_node() to the entire
memory.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-5-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add else to split mutually exclusive case and avoid some unnecessary check.
It doesn't seem to change code generation (compiler is smart), but I think
it helps readability.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment location]
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200924111641.28922-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This patch reduces the running time for compaction_test from about 27 sec,
to 3.3 sec, which is about an 8x speedup.
These numbers are for an Intel x86_64 system with 32 GB of DRAM.
The compaction_test.c program was spending most of its time doing mmap(),
1 MB at a time, on about 25 GB of memory.
Instead, do the mmaps 100 MB at a time. (Going past 100 MB doesn't make
things go much faster, because other parts of the program are using the
remaining time.)
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Sri Jayaramappa <sjayaram@akamai.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201002080621.551044-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We have observed that drop_caches can take a considerable amount of
time (<put data here>). Especially when there are many memcgs involved
because they are adding an additional overhead.
It is quite unfortunate that the operation cannot be interrupted by a
signal currently. Add a check for fatal signals into the main loop so
that userspace can control early bailout.
There are two reasons:
1. We have too many memcgs, even though one object freed in one memcg,
the sum of object is bigger than 10.
2. We spend a lot of time in traverse memcg once. So, the memcg who
traversed at the first have been freed many objects. Traverse memcg
next time, the freed count bigger than 10 again.
We can get the following info through 'ps':
root:~# ps -aux | grep drop
root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 1986319 ... R 18:56 117:27 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 2002148 ... R Aug24 5720:39 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 2564666 ... R 18:59 113:58 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 2639347 ... R Sep03 2383:39 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 3904747 ... R 03:35 993:31 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 4016780 ... R Aug21 7882:18 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
Use bpftrace follow 'freed' value in drop_slab_node:
root:~# bpftrace -e 'kprobe:drop_slab_node+70 {@ret=hist(reg("bp")); }'
Attaching 1 probe...
^B^C
@ret:
[64, 128) 1 | |
[128, 256) 28 | |
[256, 512) 107 |@ |
[512, 1K) 298 |@@@ |
[1K, 2K) 613 |@@@@@@@ |
[2K, 4K) 4435 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
[4K, 8K) 442 |@@@@@ |
[8K, 16K) 299 |@@@ |
[16K, 32K) 100 |@ |
[32K, 64K) 139 |@ |
[64K, 128K) 56 | |
[128K, 256K) 26 | |
[256K, 512K) 2 | |
In the while loop, we can check whether the TASK_KILLABLE signal is set,
if so, we should break the loop.
Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200909152047.27905-1-zangchunxin@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If a swap entry tests positive for either is_[migration|hwpoison]_entry(),
then its swap_type() is among SWP_MIGRATION_READ, SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE and
SWP_HWPOISON. All these types >= MAX_SWAPFILES, exactly what is asserted
with non_swap_entry().
So the checking non_swap_entry() in is_hugetlb_entry_migration() and
is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned() is redundant.
Let's remove it to optimize code.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-3-bhe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There is a general understanding that GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_NOWAIT are to be used
from atomic contexts. E.g. from within a spin lock or from the IRQ
context. This is correct but there are some atomic contexts where the
above doesn't hold. One of them would be an NMI context. Page allocator
has never supported that and the general fear of this context didn't let
anybody to actually even try to use the allocator there. Good, but let's
be more specific about that.
Another such a context, and that is where people seem to be more daring,
is raw_spin_lock. Mostly because it simply resembles regular spin lock
which is supported by the allocator and there is not any implementation
difference with !RT kernels in the first place. Be explicit that such a
context is not supported by the allocator. The underlying reason is that
zone->lock would have to become raw_spin_lock as well and that has turned
out to be a problem for RT
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu305c1w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de).
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929123010.5137-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Here is a very rare race which leaks memory:
Page P0 is allocated to the page cache. Page P1 is free.
Thread A Thread B Thread C
find_get_entry():
xas_load() returns P0
Removes P0 from page cache
P0 finds its buddy P1
alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 1) returns P0
P0 has refcount 1
page_cache_get_speculative(P0)
P0 has refcount 2
__free_pages(P0)
P0 has refcount 1
put_page(P0)
P1 is not freed
Fix this by freeing all the pages in __free_pages() that won't be freed
by the call to put_page(). It's usually not a good idea to split a page,
but this is a very unlikely scenario.
Fixes: e286781d5f ("mm: speculative page references")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200926213919.26642-1-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The function is_huge_zero_page() doesn't call compound_head() to make sure
the page pointer is a head page. The call to is_huge_zero_page() in
release_pages() is made before compound_head() is called so the test would
fail if release_pages() was called with a tail page of the huge_zero_page
and put_page_testzero() would be called releasing the page.
This is unlikely to be happening in normal use or we would be seeing all
sorts of process data corruption when accessing a THP zero page.
Looking at other places where is_huge_zero_page() is called, all seem to
only pass a head page so I think the right solution is to move the call
to compound_head() in release_pages() to a point before calling
is_huge_zero_page().
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917173938.16420-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Previously variable 'tmp' was initialized, but was not read later before
reassigning. So the initialization can be removed.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove `tmp' altogether]
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200904132422.17387-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In has_unmovable_pages(), the page parameter would not always be the first
page within a pageblock (see how the page pointer is passed in from
start_isolate_page_range() after call __first_valid_page()), so that would
cause checking unmovable pages span two pageblocks.
After this patch, the checking is enforced within one pageblock no matter
the page is first one or not, and obey the semantics of this function.
This issue is found by code inspection.
Michal said "this might lead to false negatives when an unrelated block
would cause an isolation failure".
Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824065811.383266-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather
unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially
plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE.
Now that the semantics are much clearer (and will be documented in a
follow-up patch including the new virtio-mem behavior), let's allow to
online partially plugged memory blocks to ZONE_MOVABLE and also consider
memory blocks that were onlined to ZONE_MOVABLE when unplugging memory.
While unplugged memory pages are, in general, unmovable, they can be
skipped when offlining memory.
virtio-mem only unplugs fairly big chunks (in the megabyte range) and
rather tries to shrink the memory region than randomly choosing memory.
In theory, if all other pages in the movable zone would be movable,
virtio-mem would only shrink that zone and not create any kind of
fragmentation.
In the future, we might want to remember the zone again and use the
information when (un)plugging memory. For now, let's keep it simple.
Note: Support for defragmentation is planned, to deal with fragmentation
after unplug due to memory chunks within memory blocks that could not get
unplugged before (e.g., somebody pinning pages within ZONE_MOVABLE for a
longer time).
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-6-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Inside has_unmovable_pages(), we have a comment describing how unmovable
data could end up in ZONE_MOVABLE - via "movablecore". Also, besides
checking if the first page in the pageblock is reserved, we don't perform
any further checks in case of ZONE_MOVABLE.
In case of memory offlining, we set REPORT_FAILURE, properly dump_page()
the page and handle the error gracefully. alloc_contig_pages() users
currently never allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. E.g., hugetlb uses
alloc_contig_pages() for the allocation of gigantic pages only, which will
never end up on the MOVABLE zone (see htlb_alloc_mask()).
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-4-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE", v5.
When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather
unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially
plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE.
Now that the semantics are much clearer (and are documented in patch #6),
let's support partially plugged memory blocks in ZONE_MOVABLE, allowing
partially plugged memory blocks to be online to ZONE_MOVABLE and also
unplugging from such memory blocks. This avoids surprises when onlining
of memory blocks suddenly fails, just because they are not completely
populated by virtio-mem (yet).
This is especially helpful for testing, but also paves the way for
virtio-mem optimizations, allowing more memory to get reliably unplugged.
Cleanup has_unmovable_pages() and set_migratetype_isolate(), providing
better documentation of how ZONE_MOVABLE interacts with different kind of
unmovable pages (memory offlining vs. alloc_contig_range()).
This patch (of 6):
Let's move the split comment regarding bootmem allocations and memory
holes, especially in the context of ZONE_MOVABLE, to the PageReserved()
check.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-1-david@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
