IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-22-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
sysfs_create_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-21-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-20-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-19-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-18-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-17-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-16-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-15-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-14-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-13-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-12-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-11-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-10-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-9-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-8-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-7-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-6-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-4-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-3-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of creating driver-specific device attributes with
devm_device_add_group() have device core do this by setting up dev_groups
pointer in the driver structure.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230729005133.1095051-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFSBAABCAA8FiEEq68RxlopcLEwq+PEeb4+QwBBGIYFAmTrxP8eHHRvcnZhbGRz
QGxpbnV4LWZvdW5kYXRpb24ub3JnAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGJsAH/iQYfQGPtWf0NAB0
qHQm+pyijdUMVGxe7Ornz7zz9tnFfck9HOKb8DDVod3qg6/LgDXpmJAwA6vZ9WhX
MpY66T8uKa4ryxLF0ir8XHPNCkwKC3XUl1Nrh/g775CWZW6I7OvAcf4w+rYU+LPZ
zd9mMjnGcNPLk8mJZ4L4yEt/Qm4q6Op5nn7FMUNTc2qKdaqSeBGo81XQi4H1f5Pw
D3aFyOz7gFeW7ATtacv8oBJVFrkAQ4FUikq8EcDYBuAryCjZAvVALDPITVibzXs6
hat2fYMIiS4O670mQ5FG0oM7Dk89XAvRFWfFY2hC9SpeRinsdb3qbdki7vqGZ+Nn
52amP6c=
=Q9cA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'v6.5' into next
Sync up with mainline to bring in updates to the shared infrastructure.
There is no possible for platform_get_irq() to return 0,
and the return value of platform_get_irq() is more sensible
to show the error reason.
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230731122246.2028651-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The driver has been switched to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, but in the error
unwinding and remove paths calls to enable_irq() were left in place, which
will lead to an incorrect enable counter value.
Fixes: bcd9730a04a1 ("Input: move to use request_irq by IRQF_NO_AUTOEN flag")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724053024.352054-3-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
tca6416_keypad_suspend() and tca6416_keypad_resume() only configure device
IRQ for wakeup. I2C core already does this by registering interrupt as a
wakeup IRQ in case when device is marked as wakeup-enabled, so we can
simply remove this code from the driver.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724053024.352054-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Remove option having i2c client contain raw gpio number instead of proper
IRQ number. There are no users of this facility in mainline and it will
allow cleaning up the driver code with regard to wakeup handling, etc.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724053024.352054-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Instead of using combination of normal IRQ and work item which required
careful handling on device teardown, use standard threaded interrupt that
allows communication wityh the chip over slow (I2C) bus directly in the
interrupt handler.
To support polling mode switch to standard polling support implemented by
the input core.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230724051345.335219-2-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
There is a period of time between the psmouse deactivate and the
ability to communicate with the SMBus companion. Insert a
sleep after the deactivate to account for the delay and ensure
the SMBus companion is responsive.
Attempting to read from the SMBus companion too quickly was causing
the touchpad on machines with an i801_smbus companion to stop working
after a sleep/resume cycle.
On resume the rmi4_smbus would fail with errors reading the SMBus version
number:
```
[5454] i2c_i801:i801_check_post:414: i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: No response
smbus_result: i2c-0 a=02c f=0000 c=fd BYTE_DATA rd res=-6
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: failed to get SMBus version number!
...
rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: Failed to restore normal operation: -6.
rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: Resume failed with code -6.
rmi4_physical rmi4-00: Failed to suspend functions: -6
rmi4_smbus 0-002c: Failed to resume device: -6
```
In this case the rmi_smb_get_version fails with -ENXIO if it happens too
soon after the preceding serio_resume -> psmouse_deactivate call.
On boot this issue could cause the touchpad to stay in the limited PS/2
mode. This only reproduced in 1 in 10 boots on the Lenovo T440p.
Failures in the log on boot would show up as:
```
psmouse serio1: synaptics: Trying to set up SMBus access
[122] i2c_i801:i801_check_post:437: i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: No response
psmouse serio1: synaptics: SMbus companion is not ready yet
```
Experimentation on the Lenovo T440p showed that a delay of 7-12ms on
resume allowed the companion to respond.
The 30ms delay in this patch was chosen based on the linux-input message:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/BYAPR03MB47572F2C65E52ED673238D41B2439@BYAPR03MB4757.namprd03.prod.outlook.com/
Signed-off-by: Jeffery Miller <jefferymiller@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230726025256.81174-1-jefferymiller@google.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Clang warns (or errors with CONFIG_WERROR=y):
drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c:149:49: error: variable 'error' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
149 | dev_err(&client->dev, "i2c read error[%d]\n", error);
| ^~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:144:65: note: expanded from macro 'dev_err'
144 | dev_printk_index_wrap(_dev_err, KERN_ERR, dev, dev_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:23: note: expanded from macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
110 | _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/input/keyboard/mcs_touchkey.c:110:11: note: initialize the variable 'error' to silence this warning
110 | int error;
| ^
| = 0
1 error generated.
A refactoring updated the error handling in this block but did not
update the dev_err() call to use fw_ver instead of error. Do so now to
fix the warning and avoid printing uninitialized memory.
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1893
Fixes: e175eae16c1b ("Input: mcs-touchkey - convert to use devm_* api")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230725-mcs_touchkey-fix-wuninitialized-v1-1-615db39af51c@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
