IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is something we clearly should be checking for, but weren't -
oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Particularly on emergency shutdown we can end up having to clean up a
lot of dirty cached btree keys here.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
If a btree node merger is followed by a split or compact of the parent
node, we could end up with the parent btree node iterator pointing to
the whiteout inserted by the btree node merge operation - the fix is to
ensure that interior btree node iterators always point to the first non
whiteout.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With erasure coding, we now have processes in the background that
compact data, causing it to take up less space on disk than when it was
written, or potentially when it was read.
This means that we can't trust the page cache when it says "we have data
on disk taking up x amount of space here" - there's always the potential
to race with background compaction.
To fix this, just check if we need to add to our disk reservation in the
bch2_extent_update() path, in the transaction that will do the btree
update.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is needed to fix a bug where we're overflowing iterators within a
btree transaction, because we're updating the stripes btree (to update
block counts) and the stripes btree trigger is unnecessarily updating
the alloc btree - it doesn't need to update the alloc btree when the
pointers within a stripe aren't changing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The stripe creation path was too state-machiney: it would always run the
full state machine until it had succesfully created a new stripe.
But if we tried to get and reuse an existing stripe after we'd already
allocated some buckets, the buckets we'd allocated might have conflicted
with the blocks in the existing stripe we need to keep - oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Also, print out more information on btree transaction iterator overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When we didn't find a key to delete we were getting a null ptr deref.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Metadata corruption bugs are hard to debug if we can't see exactly what
went wrong - try to allocate a bigger buffer so we can print out
everything we have.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Without checking if we actually flushed anything, journal reclaim could
still go into an infinite loop while trying ot shut down.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Had a type that meant we were triggering journal reclaim _much_ more
aggressively than needed. Also, fix a potential integer overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
- Try to always keep 1/8th of the journal free, on top of
pre-reservations
- Move the check for whether the journal is stuck to
bch2_journal_space_available, and make it only fire when there aren't
any journal writes in flight (that might free up space by updating
last_seq)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This patch adds a flag to journal entries which, if set, indicates that
they weren't done as flush/fua writes.
- non flush/fua journal writes don't update last_seq (i.e. they don't
free up space in the journal), thus the journal free space
calculations now check whether nonflush journal writes are currently
allowed (i.e. are we low on free space, or would doing a flush write
free up a lot of space in the journal)
- write_delay_ms, the user configurable option for when open journal
entries are automatically written, is now interpreted as the max
delay between flush journal writes (default 1 second).
- bch2_journal_flush_seq_async is changed to ensure a flush write >=
the requested sequence number has happened
- journal read/replay must now ignore, and blacklist, any journal
entries newer than the most recent flush entry in the journal. Also,
the way the read_entire_journal option is handled has been improved;
struct journal_replay now has an entry, 'ignore', for entries that
were read but should not be used.
- assorted refactoring and improvements related to journal read in
journal_io.c and recovery.c
Previously, we'd have to issue a flush/fua write every time we
accumulated a full journal entry - typically the bucket size. Now we
need to issue them much less frequently: when an fsync is requested, or
it's been more than write_delay_ms since the last flush, or when we need
to free up space in the journal. This is a significant performance
improvement on many write heavy workloads.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This patch increases the maximum journal buffers in flight from 2 to 4 -
this will be particularly helpful when in the future we stop requiring
flush+fua for every journal write.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
If we have an error in the btree interior update path that prevents us
from journalling the update, we can't issue the corresponding btree node
write - we didn't get a journal sequence number that would cause it to
be ignored in recovery.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
If the journal is halted, journal reclaim won't necessarily be able to
make any forward progress, and won't accomplish anything anyways - we
should bail out so that we don't get stuck looping in reclaim when the
caches are too dirty and we should be shutting down.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
On write error, the vfs inode's i_size may be inconsistent with the
btree inode's i_size - flag this so we don't have spurious assertions.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
it's useful to know whether an error was for a read or a write - this
also standardizes error messages a bit more.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Various filesystem usage counters are kept in percpu counters, with one
set per in flight journal buffer. Right now all the code that deals with
it assumes that there's only two buffers/sets of counters, but the
number of journal bufs is getting increased to 4 in the next patch - so
refactor that code to not assume a constant.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
These only come up when building in userspace, for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The error check was inverted - leading fsyncs to get stuck and hang,
oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Since we now always preallocate the maximum number of iterators when we
initialize a btree transaction, getting an iterator never fails - we can
delete a fair amount of error path code.
This patch also simplifies the iterator allocation code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This way, these tests can be used with tests that inject IO errors and
shut down the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This deletes some duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Introducing the journal+btree iter introduced a regression where we
stopped using BTREE_ITER_PREFETCH - this is a performance regression on
rotating disks.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
For the new nodes an interior btree update makes reachable, updates to
those nodes may be journalled after the btree update starts but before
the transactional part - where we make those nodes reachable. Those
updates need to be kept in the journal until after the btree update
completes, hence we should always get a journal pin at the start of the
interior update.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
In the btree key cache code, failing to flush a dirty key is a serious
error, but it doesn't need to be a BUG_ON(), we can stop the filesystem
instead.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The rhashtable code doesn't like when we destroy an rhashtable that was
never initialized
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We can't run journal reclaim until we've finished replaying updates to
interior btree nodes - the check for this was in the wrong place though,
leading to journal reclaim spinning before it was allowed to proceed.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We were incorrectly ignoring the return value of __readahead_batch,
leading to a null ptr deref in __bch2_page_state_create().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Avoid taking the journal lock if we don't have to.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The interior btree node update path has changed, this is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This helps reduce stack usage by avoiding multiple btree_trans on the
stack.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
fsck doesn't know about the btree key cache, and non-cached iterators
aren't cache coherent (yet?)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_bucket_alloc() requires rcu_read_lock() to be held.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is needed to ensure we don't deadlock because journal reclaim and
thus memory reclaim isn't making forward progress.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Memory reclaim requires journal reclaim to make forward progress - it's
what cleans our caches - thus, while we're in journal reclaim or holding
the journal reclaim lock we can't recurse into memory reclaim.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The transaction restart path traverses all iterators, we don't need to
do it here.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Ensuring the key cache isn't too dirty is critical for ensuring that the
shrinker can reclaim memory.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The shrinker should start scanning for entries that can be freed oldest
to newest - this way, we can avoid scanning a lot of entries that are
too new to be freed.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We allocate a lot of these, and we're seeing sporading OOMs - this will
help with tracking those down.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We were incorrectly detecting a journal deadlock - the journal filling
up - when only the journal pin fifo had filled up; if the journal pin
fifo is full that just means we need to wait on reclaim.
This plumbs through better error reporting so we can better discriminate
in the journal_res_get path what's going on.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
tracking down a bug where we see a btree node pointer in the wrong node
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
