IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
For PVC, the base die and compute tile have separate stepping values
that we need to track; we'll use the existing graphics_step field to
represent the compute tile stepping and add a new 'basedie_step' field.
Unlike past platforms, steppings for these components are represented by
specific bitfields within the PCI revision ID, and we shouldn't make
assumptions about the non-CT, non-BD bits staying 0. Let's update our
stepping code accordingly.
Bspec: 44484
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220527163348.1936146-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Sync up with v5.18-rc1, in particular to get 5e3094cfd9
("drm/i915/xehpsdv: Add has_flat_ccs to device info").
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
In the past we had a need to differentiate TGL U and TGL Y, there
was a different voltage swing table for each subplatform and some PCI
ids of this subplatforms are shared but it turned out that it was a
specification mistake and the voltage swing table was indeed the same
but we went ahead with that patch because we needed to differentiate
TGL U and Y from TGL H and by that time TGL H was embargoed so that
was the perfect way to land it upstream.
Now the embargo for TGL H is long past and now we even have
INTEL_TGL_12_GT1_IDS with all TGL H ids, so we can drop this PCI root
check and only rely in the PCI ids to differentiate TGL U and Y from
TGL H that actually has code differences.
Besides the simplification this will fix issues in virtualization
environments where the PCI root is virtualized and don't have the same
id as actual hardware.
v2:
- add and set INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_UY
Cc: Fred Gao <fred.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yu He <yu.he@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220222141424.35165-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another fork of the DG2 design has appeared, known as "DG2-G12;" let's
add it as a new subplatform. As with G11, the GT stepping resets back
to A0 (so a DG2-G12 A0 is similar, but not identical, to a DG2-G10 C0)
but the display steppings continue to use the same numbering scheme as
G10 and G11.
Some existing DG2 workarounds are starting to be extended to the DG2-G12
subplatform. So far only workarounds that were "permanent" for both
DG2-G10 and DG2-G11 have been tagged for DG2-G12, but more
stepping-specific workarounds are likely to show up in the future.
Bspec: 44477
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220120235016.1209326-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Switch ICL to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
platforms going forward. While we're at it, let's include some
additional steppings that have popped up, even if we don't yet have any
workarounds tied to those steppings (we probably need to audit our
workaround list soon to see if any of the bounds have moved or if new
workarounds have appeared).
Note that the current bspec table is missing information about how to
map PCI revision ID to GT/display steppings; it only provides an SoC
stepping. The mapping to GT/display steppings (which aren't always the
same as the SoC stepping) used to be in the bspec, but was apparently
dropped during an update in Nov 2019; I've made my changes here based on
an older bspec snapshot that still had the necessary information. We've
requested that the missing information be restored.
I'm only including the production revids in the table here since we're
past the point at which we usually stop trying to support pre-production
hardware. An appropriate check is added to
intel_detect_preproduction_hw() to print an error and taint the kernel
just in case someone still tries to load the driver on old
pre-production hardware.
v2:
- Drop pre-production steppings and add error/taint at startup when
loading on pre-production hardware.
Bspec: 21141 # pre-Nov 2019 snapshot
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Switch BXT to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
platforms going forward. Note that the REVID macros we had before
weren't being used anywhere in the code and weren't even correct; the
table values come from the bspec (and omits all the placeholder and
preproduction revisions).
Although nothing in the code is using the data from this table at the
moment, we expect some upcoming DMC patches to start utilizing it.
Bspec: 13620
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Switch SKL to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
platforms going forward. Also drop the preproduction revisions and add
the newer steppings we hadn't already handled.
Note that SKL has a case where a newer revision ID corresponds to an
older GT/disp stepping (0x9 -> STEP_J0, 0xA -> STEP_I1). Also, the lack
of a revision ID 0x8 in the table is intentional and not an oversight.
We'll re-write the KBL-specific comment to make it clear that these kind
of quirks are expected.
v2:
- Since GT and display steppings are always identical on SKL use a
macro to set both values at once in a more readable manner. (Anusha)
- Drop preproduction steppings.
Bspec: 13626
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
