Zhang Yi df95b0e4f1 ext2: correct max file size computing
[ Upstream commit 50b3a818991074177a56c87124c7a7bdf5fa4f67 ]

We need to calculate the max file size accurately if the total blocks
that can address by block tree exceed the upper_limit. But this check is
not correct now, it only compute the total data blocks but missing
metadata blocks are needed. So in the case of "data blocks < upper_limit
&& total blocks > upper_limit", we will get wrong result. Fortunately,
this case could not happen in reality, but it's confused and better to
correct the computing.

  bits   data blocks   metadatablocks   upper_limit
  10        16843020            66051    2147483647
  11       134480396           263171    1073741823
  12      1074791436          1050627     536870911 (*)
  13      8594130956          4198403     268435455 (*)
  14     68736258060         16785411     134217727 (*)
  15    549822930956         67125251      67108863 (*)
  16   4398314962956        268468227      33554431 (*)

  [*] Need to calculate in depth.

Fixes: 1c2d14212b15 ("ext2: Fix underflow in ext2_max_size()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220212050532.179055-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-04-20 09:06:35 +02:00
..
2020-11-10 10:23:59 +01:00
2020-01-29 10:24:34 +01:00
2019-08-06 18:29:38 +02:00
2022-01-27 08:47:40 +01:00
2021-11-26 11:48:36 +01:00
2019-03-13 14:04:52 -07:00
2018-12-21 14:11:31 +01:00
2020-04-02 17:20:27 +02:00
2018-02-17 13:21:15 +01:00
2021-12-14 10:04:48 +01:00
2017-06-14 15:06:01 +02:00