Kyle McMartin d61e7380b4 drm: edid revision 0 is valid
edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message
indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed.

We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so
it can't ever be less than 0.

Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be
EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because
of it.

Reported-by: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2009-02-25 14:47:05 +10:00
..
2009-01-08 16:29:41 +00:00
2009-02-18 17:41:38 -08:00
2009-02-02 23:26:57 -08:00
2009-02-18 15:37:56 -08:00
2009-01-29 18:04:43 -08:00
2009-02-25 14:47:05 +10:00
2009-02-24 19:19:50 +01:00
2009-01-11 01:34:25 +01:00
2009-01-15 16:39:40 -08:00
2009-01-09 03:39:43 -05:00
2009-02-02 19:53:02 +03:00
2009-02-11 14:25:36 -08:00
2009-02-18 15:37:56 -08:00
2009-02-11 14:25:37 -08:00