IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Sometimes we would get the following flow when doing an i2cset:
0x1 STATUS SLAVE_ACTIVITY=0x1 : RAW_INTR_STAT=0x514 : INTR_STAT=0x4
I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED
0x1 STATUS SLAVE_ACTIVITY=0x0 : RAW_INTR_STAT=0x714 : INTR_STAT=0x204
I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED
I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED
Documentation/i2c/slave-interface.rst says that I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED,
which is mandatory, should be sent while the data did not arrive yet. It
means in a write-request I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED should be reported
before any I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED.
By the way, I2C_SLAVE_STOP didn't be reported in the above case because
DW_IC_INTR_STAT was not 0x200.
dev->status can be used to record the current state, especially Designware
I2C controller has no interrupts to identify a write-request. This patch
makes not only I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED been reported first when
IC_INTR_RX_FULL is rising and dev->status isn't STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS
but also I2C_SLAVE_STOP been reported when a STOP condition is received.
Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <michael.wu@vatics.com>
Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
3b5f7f10ff