mirror of
https://github.com/ansible/awx.git
synced 2024-10-31 23:51:09 +03:00
476c43f7a7
The idea of a resource is an abstract one using Generic Foreign Key and not a concrete one with a model.
193 lines
9.3 KiB
Markdown
193 lines
9.3 KiB
Markdown
# Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
|
|
|
|
This document describes the RBAC implementation of the Ansible Tower Software.
|
|
The intended audience of this document is the Ansible Tower developer.
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
### RBAC - System Basics
|
|
|
|
There are four main concepts to be familiar with, Roles, Resources, Users, and Permissions.
|
|
Users can be members of a role, which gives them access to any permissions bestowed upon
|
|
that Role. In order to access a Resource, a Permission must be granted to a Role enabling
|
|
all members of that Role to access the Resource.
|
|
|
|
For example, if I have an organization named "MyCompany" and I want to allow
|
|
two people, "Alice", and "Bob", access to manage all the settings associated
|
|
with that organization, I'd create a role (maybe called "MyCompany
|
|
Administrator"), create a Permission to edit the organization "MyCompany" and
|
|
assign it to the "MyCompany Administrator" role. I'd also add the two users
|
|
"Alice" and "Bob" as members of the Role.
|
|
|
|
It is often the case that you have many Roles in a system, and you want some
|
|
roles to include all of the permissions of other roles. For example, you may
|
|
want a System Administrator to have access to everything that an Organization
|
|
Administrator has access to, who has everything that a Project Administrator
|
|
has access to, and so on. We refer to this concept as the 'Role Hierarchy', and
|
|
is represented by allowing Roles to have "Parent Roles". Any permission that a
|
|
Role has is implicitly granted to any parent roles (or parents of those
|
|
parents, and so on). Of course Roles can have more than one parent, and
|
|
permissions are implicitly granted to all parents. (Technically speaking, this
|
|
forms a directional graph instead of a hierarchy, but the concept should remain
|
|
intuitive.)
|
|
|
|
![Example RBAC hierarchy](img/rbac_example.png?raw=true)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Implementation Overview
|
|
|
|
The RBAC system allows you to create and layer roles for controlling access to resources. Any Django Model can
|
|
be made into a resource in the RBAC system by using the `ResourceMixin`. Once a model is accessible as a resource you can
|
|
extend the model definition to have specific roles using the `ImplicitRoleField`. This role field allows you to
|
|
configure the name of a role, any parents a role may have, and the permissions this role will grant to members.
|
|
|
|
### Roles
|
|
|
|
Roles are defined for a resource. If a role has any parents, these parents will be considered when determining
|
|
what roles are checked when accessing a resource.
|
|
|
|
ResourceA
|
|
|-- AdminRole
|
|
|
|
ResourceB
|
|
| -- AdminRole
|
|
|-- parent = ResourceA.AdminRole
|
|
|
|
When a user attempts to access ResourceB we will check for their access using the set of all unique roles, including the parents.
|
|
|
|
ResourceA.AdminRole, ResourceB.AdminRole
|
|
|
|
This would provide any members of the above roles with access to ResourceB.
|
|
|
|
#### Singleton Role
|
|
|
|
There is a special case _Singleton Role_ that you can create. This type of role is for system wide roles.
|
|
|
|
### Models
|
|
|
|
The RBAC system defines a few new models. These models represent the underlying RBAC implementation and generally will be abstracted away from your daily development tasks by the implicit fields and mixins.
|
|
|
|
#### `Role`
|
|
|
|
`Role` defines a single role within the RBAC implementation. It encapsulates the `ancestors`, `parents`, and `members` for a role. This model is intentionally kept dumb and it has no explicit knowledge of a `Resource`. The `Role` model (get it?), defines some methods that aid in the granting and creation of roles.
|
|
|
|
##### `visible_roles(cls, user)`
|
|
|
|
`visible_roles` is a class method that will lookup all of the `Role` instances a user can "see". This includes any roles the user is a direct decendent of as well as any ancestor roles.
|
|
|
|
##### `singleton(cls, name)`
|
|
|
|
The `singleton` class method is a helper method on the `Role` model that helps in the creation of singleton roles. It will return the role by name if it already exists or create and return the new role in the case it does not.
|
|
|
|
##### `get_absolute_url(self)`
|
|
|
|
`get_absolute_url` returns the consumable URL endpoint for the `Role`.
|
|
|
|
##### `rebuild_role_ancestor_list(self)`
|
|
|
|
`rebuild_role_ancestor_list` will rebuild the current role ancestory that is stored in the `ancestors` field of a `Role`. This is called for you by `save` and different Django signals.
|
|
|
|
##### `is_ancestor_of(self, role)`
|
|
|
|
`is_ancestor_of` returns if the given `role` is an ancestor of the current `Role` instance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### `RolePermission`
|
|
|
|
`RolePermission` holds unique `role_permissions`. You interact with this model indirectly when declaring `ImplicitRoleField` fields. Generally you will not directly use this model unless you are extending the RBAC implementation itself.
|
|
|
|
### Fields
|
|
|
|
#### `ImplicitRoleField`
|
|
|
|
`ImplicitRoleField` fields are declared on your model. They provide the definition of grantable roles for accessing your resource. Configuring the role is done using some keyword arguments that are provided during declaration.
|
|
|
|
`parent_role` is the link to any parent roles you want considered when a user is requesting access to your resource. A `parent_role` can be declared as a single string, `parent.readonly`, or a list of many roles, `['parentA.readonly', 'parentB.readonly']`. It is important to note that a user does not need a parent role to access a resource if granted the role for that resource explicitly. Also a user will not have access to any parent resources by being granted a role for a child resource. We demonstrate this in the _Usage_ section of this document.
|
|
|
|
`role_name` is the display name of the role. This is useful when generating reports or looking the results of queries.
|
|
|
|
`permissions` can be used when the model that contains the
|
|
`ImplicitRoleField` utilizs the `ResourceMixin`. When present, a
|
|
`RolePermission` entry will be automatically created to grant the specified
|
|
permissions on the resource to the role defined by the `ImplicitRoleField`.
|
|
|
|
This field should be specified as a dictionary of permissions you wish to
|
|
automatically grant. Below is a list of available permissions. The special
|
|
permission `all` is a shortcut for generating a dict with all of the explicit
|
|
permissions listed below set to `True`. Note that permissions default to
|
|
`False` if not explicitly provided.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# Available Permissions
|
|
{'create':True, 'read':True, 'write':True, 'update':True,
|
|
'delete':True, 'scm_update':True, 'use':True, 'execute':True}
|
|
# Special Permissions
|
|
{'all':True}
|
|
# Example: readonly
|
|
{'read':True}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Mixins
|
|
|
|
#### `ResourceMixin`
|
|
|
|
By mixing in the `ResourceMixin` to your model, you are turning your model in to a resource in the eyes of the RBAC implementation. Your model will gain the helper methods that aid in the checking the access a users roles provides them to your resource.
|
|
|
|
##### `accessible_objects(cls, user, permissions)`
|
|
|
|
`accessible_objects` is a class method to use instead of `Model.objects`. This method will restrict the query of objects to only the objects that a user has the given permissions for. Note that any permission fields that are left blank will default to `False`. `accessible_objects` will only filter out resources where the expected permission was `True` but was returned as `False`.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
objects = Model.accessible_objects(user, {'write':True})
|
|
objects.filter(name__istartswith='december')
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
##### `get_permissions(self, user)`
|
|
|
|
`get_permissions` is an instance method that will give you the permission dictionary for a given user. This permission dictionary will take in to account any parent roles the user is apart of.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
>>> instance.get_permissions(admin)
|
|
{'create':True, 'read':True, 'write':True, 'update':True,
|
|
'delete':True, 'scm_update':True, 'execute':True, 'use':True}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### `accessible_by(self, user, permissions)`
|
|
|
|
`accessible_by` is an instance method that wraps the `get_permissions` method. Given a user and a dictionary of permissions this method will return `True` or `False` if a users roles give them a set of permissions that match the provided permissions dictionary. Note that any permission fields left blank will default to `False`. `accessible_by` will only return `False` in a case where the passed in permission is expected to be `True` but was returned as `False`.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
>>> instance.accessible_by(admin, {'use':True, 'read':True})
|
|
True
|
|
```
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
After exploring the _Overview_ the usage of the RBAC implementation in your code should feel unobtrusive and natural.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# make your model a Resource
|
|
class Document(Model, ResourceMixin):
|
|
...
|
|
# declare your new role
|
|
readonly_role = ImplicitRoleField(
|
|
role_name="readonly",
|
|
permissions={'read':True},
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Now that your model is a resource and has a `Role` defined, you can begin to access the helper methods provided to you by the `ResourceMixin` for checking a users access to your resource. Here is the output of a Python REPL session.
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# we've created some documents and a user
|
|
>>> document = Document.objects.filter(pk=1)
|
|
>>> user = User.objects.first()
|
|
>>> document.accessible_by(user, {'read': True})
|
|
False # not accessible by default
|
|
>>> document.readonly_role.memebers.add(user)
|
|
>>> document.accessible_by(user, {'read':True})
|
|
True # now it is accessible
|
|
>>> document.accessible_by(user, {'read':True, 'write':True})
|
|
False # my role does not have write permission
|
|
```
|