IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
. Add "monitoring" option to "activation" section of lvm.conf
. Have clvmd consult the lvm.conf "activation/monitoring" too.
. Introduce toollib.c:get_activation_monitoring_mode().
. Error out when both --monitor and --ignoremonitoring are provided.
. Add --monitor and --ignoremonitoring support to lvcreate. Update
lvcreate man page accordingly.
. Clarify that '--monitor' controls the start and stop of monitoring in
the {vg,lv}change man pages.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
This option should be configurable, but for now
do not set it at all.
(lvm2app is used in udisks probers and there
cac cause several nasty races when trying to update
lvmcache during rescan.)
Fix add/remove tag function headers.
Fix a lot of little problems with doxygen comments.
Clarify the basic objects and their handles, and place functions with their
appropriate handles/objects.
All this cleanup moves automatic documentation of lvm2app much closer to being
useful as official documentation. In the future I will add some examples
and plan to build the examples as part of the unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Add lvm2app functions to manage LV tags.
For lvm_lv_get_tags(), we return a list of tags, similar to other
functions that return lists. An empty list is returned if there
are no tags. NULL is returned if there is a problem obtaining
the list of tags.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Add lvm2app functions to manage VG tags.
For lvm_vg_get_tags(), we return a list of tags, similar to other
functions that return lists. An empty list is returned if there
are no VG tags. NULL is returned if there is a problem obtaining
the list of tags.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Add a supporting function to copy a list of internal tags to lvm2app list.
We need to put this here because of the lvm_str_list_t type which we export
in lvm2app.h. If we didn't export this type, we could put this in the
internal library and use struct str_list.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Internally we store sizes in sectors, but lvm2app exports sizes
in bytes. We could get fancier and allow units configuration but
this fix should do for now.
Fixes rhbz561422.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
where we should not expose internal VG names/uuids (the ones with "#" prefix )through the
interface. Otherwise, we could end up with library users opening internal VGs which will
initiate locking mechanism that won't be cleaned up properly.
"#orphans_{lvm1, lvm2, pool}" names are treated in a special way, they are truncated first
to "orphans" and this is used as a part of the lock name then (e.g. while calling lvm_vg_open()).
When library user calls lvm_vg_close(), the original name "orphans_{lvm1, lvm2, pool}"
is used directly and therefore no unlock occurs.
We should exclude internal VG names and uuids in the lists provided by lvmcache:
lvmcache_get_vgids() and lvmcache_get_vgnames().
more descriptive message if locking fails instead of
"Locking type -1 initialisation failed."
Use read-only locking instead of misleading ignorelocking option
in message.
Rename fill_default_pvcreate_params to pvcreate_params_set_defaults.
Rename pvcreate_validate_restore_params to pvcreate_restore_params_validate.
Rename pvcreate_validate_params to pvcreate_params_validate.
We need defaults for pvcreate_params at a higher level - this will
allow us to use a common function from the tools to take defaults,
then fill in any non-defaults from the commandline.
Future patches will refactor vgcreate/vgextend to call this function
if one or more pvcreate parameters are given on the commandline.
Another refactoring for implicit pvcreate support. We need to get
the pvcreate parameters somehow to the vg_extend routine. Options
seemed to be:
1. Attach the parameters to struct volume_group. I personally
did not like this idea in most cases, though one could make an
agrument why it might be ok at least for some of the parameters
(e.g. metadatacopies).
2. Pass them in to the extend routine. This second route seemed
to be the best approach given the constraints.
Future patches will parse the command line and fill in the actual
values for the pvcreate_single call.
Should be no functional change.
Of the vgs field vg_attr, a few of the most likely to be used attributes
are clustered, exported, and partial. This patch adds the following 3
functions:
uint64_t lvm_vg_is_clustered(const vg_t vg)
uint64_t lvm_vg_is_exported(const vg_t vg)
uint64_t lvm_vg_is_partial(const vg_t vg)
Now that we've refactored the internal library functions that do the
vg_remove, we can handle the deferred commit of a lvm_vg_remove() inside
lvm_vg_write(). This makes the VG create/remove API more consistent in
terms of disk commits - they now both require an lvm_vg_write() to commit
the create or remove to disk.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Split vg_remove_single into vg_remove_check (mandatory checks before
vgremove) and vg_remove (do actual remove by committing to disk).
In liblvm, we'd like to provide an consistent API that allows multiple
changes in memory, then let lvm_vg_write() control the commit to disk. In
some cases (for example, lvresize calls fsadm) this may not be possible.
However, since we are using an object model and dividing things into small
operations, the most logical model seems to be the lvm_vg_write model, and
handling the special cases as they arrive. So as best as possible
we move towards this end.
A possible optimization would be to consolidate vg_remove (committing)
code with vgreduce code. A second possible optimization is making vgreduce
of the last device equivalent to vgremove. Today, lvm_vg_reduce fails if
vgreduce is called with the last device, but from an object model perspective
we could view this as equivalent to vgremove and allow it. My gut feel is
we do not want to do this though.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
This patch update pv_t handle to be consistent with lvm_t - define as a pointer
to internal struct physical_volume.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
This patch update lv_t handle to be consistent with lvm_t - define as a pointer
to internal struct logical_volume.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
This patch update vg_t handle to be consistent with lvm_t - define as a pointer
to internal struct volume_group.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
For now, a simple way to enforce the read/write semantics is to just save the
open mode of the VG. If the caller uses lvm_vg_create, the mode is write.
The caller using lvm_vg_open can use either read or write to open the VG.
Once we have this, we enforce the permissions on each API call and don't allow
a caller to modify a VG that has not been opened properly.
This may be better combined with the locking mode, but I view that as future
cleanup, past this initial release. The intial release should enforce the
basic object semantics though, as described in the lvm.h file.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Adding the ability to get the seqno is important for an application to
determine if something has changed in a VG. Otherwise, the only way to
know is to open the VG with write permission and hold the handle.
This addresses a a large amount of Alasdair's review. Subsequent patches
will address remaining issues.
Addressed:
// FIXME Mention that's also required on error.
// FIXME Be consistent in terminology. It's called "system_dir" then last sentence says "system directory setting". Is it referring to "system_dir" there or something else?
// FIXME Mention it frees all resources and cannot be used subsequently?
// FIXME What does "any system configuration" mean?
// FIXME Expand on that explanation a bit, now that we know what the other fns look like.
// FIXME Not sure about that - it needs to scan sometimes. "will not" or "might not" ?
// FIXME: That's a FIXME in the code!!!
// FIXME What does "copied" mean in this context???
// FIXME Say what struct the returned struct dm_list is a list of...
// FIXME "This API" ? This function creates an object in memory?
// FIXME This function commits the Volume Group object referenced by the VG handle to disk?
// FIXME Where is "Name" defined? Absolute pathname?
Outstanding:
// FIXME Version function first? No structs or handles needed for that.
// FIXME Sort out this alignment. "Set an" directly below "system_dir" looks awful. Indent differently? More blank lines?
// FIXME Check how doxygen processes this. E.g. "return: LVM handle. You must use lvm_error() to check there were no errors and confirm that the handle is valid for passing to other functions."
// FIXME Find a better name. lvm_init.
// FIXME Consider renaming according to the new name for lvm_create.
// FIXME Please can we use dm_malloc throughout?
Allowing the caller to override the LVM configuration with an API will
enable them to use things such as device filters.
While very flexible, there is some danger to this API in that it will
make it harder to debug setups that have a changing config and deduce
what might have happened. At some point we may want to limit the scope
of this API but for now it is as open as the --config option to lvm commands.
Update exported symbols. When I renamed lvm_reload_config to lvm_config_reload
I forgot to rename so I renamed that one here.
This I believe is the last liblvm API for now. ;-)
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
These lower-priority interfaces are not currently implemented in liblvm
but are on the TODO list in the near term.
Author: Thomas Woerner <twoerner@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
